Quantity discrimination in Tenebrio molitor: evidence of numerosity discrimination in an invertebrate?

Numerosity discrimination, the ability to distinguish between sets with more and less items, is recognised as the foundation for higher numerical abilities. Understanding numerosity discrimination from a comparative perspective is hence pivotal in tracing the evolution of numerical representation systems. However, numerosity discrimination has been well studied only in vertebrates, where two innate systems of number representation have been described: an ‘analog magnitude system’ used to discriminate among numerosities by representing them as cardinal magnitudes and a ‘parallel individualisation system’ that allows precise discrimination among small arrays of items (≤4) by representing objects individually. We investigated the existence of quantity discrimination in an insect species (Tenebrio molitor) by using a spontaneous two-choice procedure in which males were exposed to substrates bearing odours from different numbers of females (≤4) in increasing numerosity ratios (1:4, 1:3 and 1:2). We show that males can discriminate sources of odours reflecting 1 versus 4 and 1 versus 3 females, but not 2 versus 4 or 1 versus 2, indicating that T. molitor males exhibit a marked preference for sources reflecting more female donors only when numerosity ratios are below 1:2. We discuss the functional significance of this finding and whether our pattern of results could be best explained by summation of a non-numerical continuous variable or by the existence of a numerosity discrimination mechanism with an operational signature ratio of 1:2.

[1]  M. Gage,et al.  Ejaculate size varies with socio‐sexual situation in an insect , 1991 .

[2]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Global perception in small brains: Topological pattern recognition in honey bees , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Richard Karban,et al.  How 17-year cicadas keep track of time. , 2000 .

[4]  David F. Sherry,et al.  Interval Timing by an Invertebrate, the Bumble Bee Bombus impatiens , 2006, Current Biology.

[5]  K. Ohsawa,et al.  A Sex Attractant of the Yellow Mealworm, Tenebrio molitor L., and Its Role in the Mating Behavior , 1986 .

[6]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Abstract representations of numbers in the animal and human brain , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[7]  Elizabeth M. Brannon,et al.  The evolution and ontogeny of ordinal numerical ability , 2002 .

[8]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Evolutionary and developmental foundations of human knowledge: A case study of mathematics , 2004 .

[9]  R. Menzel,et al.  Cognition in Invertebrates , 2007 .

[10]  R M Church,et al.  Temporal integration in duration and number discrimination. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[11]  Susan Carey,et al.  Spontaneous number representation in semi–free–ranging rhesus monkeys , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  L. Simmons,et al.  Male-derived cuticular hydrocarbons signal sperm competition intensity and affect ejaculate expenditure in crickets , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  Karen Wynn,et al.  Psychological foundations of number: numerical competence in human infants , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[15]  P. Skorupski,et al.  Animal Cognition: An Insect's Sense of Time? , 2006, Current Biology.

[16]  Andrew A. Pierce,et al.  Meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, can distinguish more over-marks from fewer over-marks , 2005, Animal Cognition.

[17]  C. Packer,et al.  Roaring and numerical assessment in contests between groups of female lions, Panthera leo , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  E. Font,et al.  Chemosensory assessment of sperm competition levels and the evolution of internal spermatophore guarding , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  William A. Roberts,et al.  Principles of Animal Cognition , 1997 .

[20]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[21]  G. Waldbauer,et al.  A Method for Sexing Living Pupal and Adult Yellow mealworms , 1970 .

[22]  George L. Farnsworth,et al.  NUMERICAL DISCRIMINATION BY WILD NORTHERN MOCKINGBIRDS , 2006 .

[23]  M. Rantala,et al.  Condition Dependence of Pheromones and Immune Function in the Grain Beetle Tenebrio Molitor , 2022 .

[24]  M. Dadda,et al.  Discrimination of the larger shoal in the poeciliid fish Girardinus falcatus , 2007 .

[25]  D. Turnbull.  Pheromones and Animal Behaviour , 2005 .

[26]  Jens Krause,et al.  DENSITY DEPENDENCE AND NUMEROSITY IN FRIGHT STIMULATED AGGREGATION BEHAVIOUR OF SHOALING FISH , 1995 .

[27]  R. Wehner,et al.  The Ant Odometer: Stepping on Stilts and Stumps , 2006, Science.

[28]  G. Happ,et al.  Multiple Sex Pheromones of the Mealworm Beetle, Tenebrio molitor L. , 1969, Nature.

[29]  I. Pepperberg.  Grey parrot numerical competence: a review , 2006, Animal Cognition.

[30]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Rudimental numerical competence in 5-day-old domestic chicks (Gallus gallus): identification of ordinal position. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[31]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  The Mathematical Brain , 1999 .

[32]  Marc D Hauser,et al.  Evolutionary foundations of number: spontaneous representation of numerical magnitudes by cotton–top tamarins , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  Fei Xu,et al.  Numerosity discrimination in infants: Evidence for two systems of representations , 2003, Cognition.

[34]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .

[35]  G. Rosenthal,et al.  Shoaling decisions in female swordtails: how do fish gauge group size? , 2007 .

[36]  C. Allen,et al.  The Cognitive Animal: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives on Animal Cognition , 2002 .

[37]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. , 1994, Psychological review.

[38]  J. Wheeler,et al.  Bioassay, Preliminary Purification, and Effect of Age, Crowding, and Mating on the Release of Sex Pheromone by Female Tenebrio molitor , 1969 .

[39]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Perception Space—The Final Frontier , 2005, PLoS biology.

[40]  Elizabeth S Spelke,et al.  Origins of Number Sense , 2003, Psychological science.

[41]  S. Holm.  A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[42]  P. Parker,et al.  Parasites reduce attractiveness and reproductive success in male grain beetles , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[43]  J. Drnevich.  Number of mating males and mating interval affect last-male sperm precedence in Tenebrio molitor L. , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[44]  O. Griffith,et al.  The Effect of Mating on the Pheromone System of the Yellow Mealworm Beetle, Tenebrio molitor , 2005 .

[45]  Marco Dadda,et al.  Quantity discrimination in female mosquitofish , 2006, Animal Cognition.

[46]  R. Jaeger,et al.  Salamanders (Plethodon cinereus) go for more: rudiments of number in an amphibian , 2003, Animal Cognition.

[47]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The Cognitive Neurosciences , 1996 .

[48]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. , 1998 .

[49]  M. Hauser.  What Do Animals Think About Numbers? , 2000, American Scientist.

[50]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Non-verbal numerical cognition: from reals to integers , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[51]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Evidence for counting in insects , 2008, Animal Cognition.

[52]  S. Shettleworth.  Cognition, evolution, and behavior , 1998 .

[53]  Justin N. Wood,et al.  Evidence for a non-linguistic distinction between singular and plural sets in rhesus monkeys , 2008, Cognition.

[54]  E. Font,et al.  Chemosensory cues allow male Tenebrio molitor beetles to assess the reproductive status of potential mates , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[55]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Can honey bees count landmarks? , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[56]  W. Tschinkel,et al.  Sex pheromone of the mealworm beetle (Tenebrio molitor). , 1967, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[57]  W. K. Honig,et al.  Discrimination of relative numerosity by pigeons , 1989 .

[58]  R. Church,et al.  A mode control model of counting and timing processes. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[59]  Bruce E. Lyon,et al.  Egg recognition and counting reduce costs of avian conspecific brood parasitism , 2003, Nature.

[60]  Peter L. Brooks,et al.  Visualizing data , 1997 .

[61]  Anna Dornhaus,et al.  Not everything that counts can be counted: ants use multiple metrics for a single nest trait , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[62]  W. D. Brown.  Size-assortative mating in the blister beetle Lytta magister (Coleoptera: Meloidae) is due to male and female preference for larger mates , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[63]  J. Hurst.  Individual recognition by scent , 2004 .

[64]  Guy Beauchamp,et al.  Group-size effects on vigilance: a search for mechanisms , 2003, Behavioural Processes.

[65]  Tristram D. Wyatt.  Pheromones and Animal Behaviour: Pheromones and Animal Behaviour , 2003 .

[66]  J. Heinze,et al.  Individual Recognition in Ant Queens , 2005, Current Biology.