Improving the performance of railway infrastructure and train services is the core business of railway infrastructure managers and railway undertakings. Train delays decrease capacity, punctuality, reliability and safety, and should be prevented as much as possible. Furthermore, increasing infrastructure capacity utilization causes increased risk of route conflicts and secondary delays, which on its turn prevents increasing infrastructure capacity utilization. Dense railway operations therefore require feedback of operations data to improve planning and control. Typically, train delays at stations are monitored and registered online using train detection, train describers, and timetable databases, but the accuracy is insufficient for process improvements and, in particular, delays due to route conflicts are hard to recognize from delays at stations. To assess the problem of route conflicts, accurate data on the level of track sections and signal passages are required, which can be found in train describer records. This paper presents the data mining tool TNV-Conflict based on train describer records and the add-on analysis tool TNV-Statistics that automatically determines chains of route conflicts with associated secondary delays, and rankings of signals according to number of conflicts, time loss or delay jump. This information is used to automatically identify and analyze structural and serious route conflicts due to timetable flaws or capacity bottlenecks. The aim of TNV-Statistics is to relieve the analyst from routine, time-consuming, and error-prone data processing tasks, so that the available time can be devoted to analyze and manage revealed operations problems. A case-study of real data on a busy railway corridor in The Netherlands demonstrates the tool.
[1]
Rob M.P. Goverde,et al.
Non-Discriminatory Automatic Registration of Knock-On Train Delays
,
2009
.
[2]
C. Conte,et al.
Identifying dependencies among delays
,
2008
.
[3]
T. Richter.
Systematic analyses of train run deviations from the timetable
,
2010
.
[4]
Andrew Nash,et al.
Optimizing railway timetables with OpenTimeTable
,
2004
.
[5]
Rob M.P. Goverde,et al.
TNV-PREPARE: ANALYSIS OF DUTCH RAILWAY OPERATIONS BASED ON TRAIN DETECTION DATA
,
2000
.
[6]
Rob M.P. Goverde,et al.
Punctuality of railway operations and timetable stability analysis
,
2005
.
[7]
N. van Oort,et al.
Service reliability and urban public transport design
,
2011
.
[8]
I. A. Hansen,et al.
System analysis of train operations and track occupancy at railway stations
,
2005
.
[9]
Rob M.P. Goverde,et al.
Automatic Identification of Route Conflict Occurrences and Their Consequences
,
2008
.
[10]
Marc Nunkesser,et al.
Mining Railway Delay Dependencies in Large-Scale Real-World Delay Data
,
2009,
Robust and Online Large-Scale Optimization.
[11]
Rob M.P. Goverde,et al.
A delay propagation algorithm for large-scale railway traffic networks
,
2010
.
[12]
Giovanni Longo,et al.
Automated Analysis of Train Event Recorder Data to Improve Micro-Simulation Models
,
2008
.
[13]
Jörn Pachl,et al.
Railway Operation and Control
,
2002
.
[14]
Markus Ullius.
Verwendung von Eisenbahnbetriebsdaten für die Schwachstellen- und Risikoanalyse zur Verbesserung der Angebots- und Betriebsqualität
,
2005
.
[15]
V. A. Weeda,et al.
Performance Analysis: Improving the Dutch Railway Service
,
2008
.