An Evolutionary Perspective on Information Processing

Behavioral ecologists often assume that natural selection will produce organisms that make optimal decisions. In the context of information processing, this means that the behavior of animals will be consistent with models from fields such as signal detection theory and Bayesian decision theory. We discuss work that applies such models to animal behavior and use the case of Bayesian updating to make the distinction between a description of behavior at the level of optimal decisions and a mechanistic account of how decisions are made. The idea of ecological rationality is that natural selection shapes an animal's decision mechanisms to suit its environment. As a result, decision-making mechanisms may not perform well outside the context in which they evolved. Although the assumption of ecological rationality is plausible, we argue that the exact nature of the relationship between ecology and cognitive mechanism may not be obvious.

[1]  H. Simon,et al.  Rational choice and the structure of the environment. , 1956, Psychological review.

[2]  Danielle Sulikowski,et al.  Movement and memory: different cognitive strategies are used to search for resources with different natural distributions , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[3]  P. Taylor,et al.  Test of optimal sampling by foraging great tits , 1978 .

[4]  H. Simon,et al.  Invariants of human behavior. , 1990, Annual review of psychology.

[5]  James A. R. Marshall,et al.  Does natural selection favour the Rescorla-Wagner rule? , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[6]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Exposing the behavioral gambit: the evolution of learning and decision rules , 2013 .

[7]  David C. Krakauer,et al.  Searching and Learning in a Random Environment , 1995 .

[8]  A. Houston,et al.  Integrating function and mechanism. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[9]  Hugo L. Fernandes,et al.  Differential Representations of Prior and Likelihood Uncertainty in the Human Brain , 2012, Current Biology.

[10]  S. Lea,et al.  The cognitive mechanisms of optimal sampling , 2012, Behavioural Processes.

[11]  Alasdair I. Houston,et al.  Natural selection and context-dependent values , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  Alasdair I. Houston Evolution and Rationality: Natural selection and rational decisions , 2012 .

[13]  S. Haftorn CONTEXTS AND POSSIBLE FUNCTIONS OF ALARM CALLING IN THE WILLOW TIT, PARUS MONTANUS; THE PRINCIPLE OF ‘BETTER SAFE THAN SORRY’ , 2000 .

[14]  A. Houston,et al.  Violations of transitivity under fitness maximization , 2007, Biology Letters.

[15]  Alasdair I. Houston,et al.  Flying in the face of nature , 2009, Behavioural Processes.

[16]  James A. R. Marshall,et al.  Decision-making under uncertainty: biases and Bayesians , 2011, Animal Cognition.

[17]  Daniel Nettle,et al.  The Paranoid Optimist: An Integrative Evolutionary Model of Cognitive Biases , 2006, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[18]  Douglas P. Chivers,et al.  Learning about non-predators and safe places: the forgotten elements of risk assessment , 2011, Animal Cognition.

[19]  S. Laughlin,et al.  Fly Photoreceptors Demonstrate Energy-Information Trade-Offs in Neural Coding , 2007, PLoS biology.

[20]  Alasdair I Houston,et al.  Incorporating rules for responding into evolutionary games , 1999, Nature.

[21]  M. Haselton,et al.  Error management theory: a new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  Alasdair I. Houston,et al.  The value of food: effects of open and closed economies , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  Elizabeth C. Hirschman,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[24]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Speed-accuracy tradeoffs in animal decision making. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  G. Thomas,et al.  The influences of encountering a food object on subsequent searching behaviour in Gasterosteus aculeatus L , 1974 .

[26]  A I Houston,et al.  The ecological rationality of state-dependent valuation. , 2012, Psychological review.

[27]  E. Charnov Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.

[28]  J. Hutchinson,et al.  Simple heuristics and rules of thumb: Where psychologists and behavioural biologists might meet , 2005, Behavioural Processes.

[29]  J. Krebs,et al.  Lagging Partial Preferences for Cryptic Prey: A Signal Detection Analysis of Great Tit Foraging , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[30]  A. Houston,et al.  Optimal prey choice and discrimination time in the great tit (Parus major L.) , 1980, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[31]  A Houston,et al.  The application of statistical decision theory to animal behaviour. , 1980, Journal of theoretical biology.

[32]  P. Trimmer Optimal behaviour can violate the principle of regularity , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  H. Robbins Some aspects of the sequential design of experiments , 1952 .

[34]  James A. R. Marshall,et al.  Mammalian choices: combining fast-but-inaccurate and slow-but-accurate decision-making systems , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  Tim W Fawcett,et al.  An Adaptive Response to Uncertainty Generates Positive and Negative Contrast Effects , 2013, Science.

[36]  Alasdair I. Houston,et al.  Imperfectly optimal animals , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[37]  Alasdair I Houston,et al.  It is optimal to be optimistic about survival , 2012, Biology Letters.

[38]  Alasdair I Houston,et al.  Foraging currencies, metabolism and behavioural routines. , 2014, The Journal of animal ecology.

[39]  Randolph M. Nesse,et al.  Natural selection and the regulation of defenses: A signal detection analysis of the smoke detector principle. , 2004 .

[40]  Alex Kacelnik,et al.  State-dependent valuation learning in fish: Banded tetras prefer stimuli associated with greater past deprivation , 2009, Behavioural Processes.

[41]  A. Houston,et al.  Optimal daily routines of singing and foraging in a bird singing to attract a mate , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[42]  A. Kacelnik,et al.  Cost can increase preference in starlings , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[43]  Joseph Y. Halpern,et al.  Coevolution of learning and data-acquisition mechanisms: a model for cognitive evolution , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[44]  A. Houston,et al.  The Common Currency for Behavioral Decisions , 1986, The American Naturalist.