Machine Intelligence Mixture of Experts and Bayesian Networks

In Chap. 6, we introduced Bayesian networks and some of the traditionAbstractal methods for designing them from data and pointed out some of the challenges with these approaches. In this chapter, we introduce a much simpler approach that escapes some of these challenges. This approach, we admit, will clearly not be an adequate substitute for all BN applications, but may well be adequate for many classification tasks. This approach uses a simple three-tier network, with the central node (or nodes) for the classification, an input layer for variables that influence the probability of membership in each class, and an output layer for variables whose probability is influenced by the class. We did not invent this approach, but we show how the MI methods in previous chapters, particularly feature subset selection, can greatly simplify the task of specifying the BN topology by reducing the available features to a small and fairly uncorrelated set. This does two things. By reducing the number features, we reduce the data requirements—maybe to manageable levels. By finding uncorrelated features, the assumptions of the simple three-tier design are less likely to be violated.

[1]  I. Lombardo,et al.  The efficacy of RVT-101, a 5-ht6 receptor antagonist, as an adjunct to donepezil in adults with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease: Completer analysis of a phase 2b study , 2015, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[2]  O. Mangasarian,et al.  Multisurface method of pattern separation for medical diagnosis applied to breast cytology. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Carey E. Floyd,et al.  Breast biopsy prediction using a case-based reasoning classifier for masses versus calcifications , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[4]  Søren Højsgaard,et al.  Graphical Independence Networks with the gRain Package for R , 2012 .

[5]  M. Gatz,et al.  Relationship Between Education and Dementia: An Updated Systematic Review , 2011, Alzheimer disease and associated disorders.

[6]  Peter J. Angeline,et al.  An evolutionary algorithm that constructs recurrent neural networks , 1994, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[7]  C E Floyd,et al.  Predicting breast cancer invasion with artificial neural networks on the basis of mammographic features. , 1997, Radiology.

[8]  Denys T. Lau,et al.  The relationship between living arrangement and preventive care use among community-dwelling elderly persons. , 2009, American journal of public health.

[9]  J. David Schaffer,et al.  A Machine Intelligence Designed Bayesian Network Applied to Alzheimer's Detection Using Demographics and Speech Data , 2016 .

[10]  Russell E Glasgow,et al.  Primary Care Colorectal Cancer Screening Recommendation Patterns , 2012, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[11]  Esteve Fernandez,et al.  Family history and environmental risk factors for colon cancer. , 2004, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[12]  C. Floyd,et al.  Effect of patient histoy data on the prediction of breast cancer from mammographic findings with artificial neural networks , 1999 .

[13]  Bianca Zadrozny,et al.  A Bayesian network decision model for supporting the diagnosis of dementia, Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment , 2014, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[14]  Wei-Yin Loh,et al.  Classification and regression trees , 2011, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[15]  Gregory Jacot Improving upon colorectal cancer screening guidelines using articifical intelligence , 2014 .

[16]  D. Vanel The American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System (BI-RADS): a step towards a universal radiological language? , 2007, European journal of radiology.