Size-Correction and Principal Components for Interspecific Comparative Studies

Phylogenetic methods for the analysis of species data are widely used in evolutionary studies. However, preliminary data transformations and data reduction procedures (such as a size-correction and principal components analysis, PCA) are often performed without first correcting for nonindependence among the observations for species. In the present short comment and attached R and MATLAB code, I provide an overview of statistically correct procedures for phylogenetic size-correction and PCA. I also show that ignoring phylogeny in preliminary transformations can result in significantly elevated variance and type I error in our statistical estimators, even if subsequent analysis of the transformed data is performed using phylogenetic methods. This means that ignoring phylogeny during preliminary data transformations can possibly lead to spurious results in phylogenetic statistical analyses of species data.

[1]  E. Smith Methods of Multivariate Analysis , 1997 .

[2]  F J Rohlf,et al.  COMPARATIVE METHODS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS VARIABLES: GEOMETRIC INTERPRETATIONS , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  T. Garland,et al.  Tempo and mode in evolution: phylogenetic inertia, adaptation and comparative methods , 2002 .

[4]  T. F. Hansen,et al.  A Comparative Method for Studying Adaptation to a Randomly Evolving Environment , 2008, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[5]  Departament de Ciències Ambientals On the misuse of residuals in ecology : testing regression residuals vs . the analysis of covariance , 2001 .

[6]  T. Price,et al.  Correlated evolution and independent contrasts. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[7]  Anthony R. Ives,et al.  Using the Past to Predict the Present: Confidence Intervals for Regression Equations in Phylogenetic Comparative Methods , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[8]  M. Pagel Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  L. Revell TESTING THE GENETIC CONSTRAINT HYPOTHESIS IN A PHYLOGENETIC CONTEXT: A SIMULATION STUDY , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[10]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  A Comment on Shearing as a Method for “Size Correction” , 1987 .

[11]  T. F. Hansen STABILIZING SELECTION AND THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ADAPTATION , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  L. Revell On the Analysis of Evolutionary Change along Single Branches in a Phylogeny , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[13]  J. Streelman,et al.  Do constructional constraints influence cichlid craniofacial diversification? , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  S. Gould ALLOMETRY AND SIZE IN ONTOGENY AND PHYLOGENY , 1966, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[15]  Liam J Revell,et al.  PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF THE EVOLUTIONARY CORRELATION USING LIKELIHOOD , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[16]  T. Schoener,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SEXUAL SIZE DIMORPHISM AND HABITAT USE IN GREATER ANTILLEAN ANOLIS LIZARDS , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  L. Revell,et al.  Testing quantitative genetic hypotheses about the evolutionary rate matrix for continuous characters , 2008 .

[18]  B. Manly Multivariate Statistical Methods : A Primer , 1986 .

[19]  J. Losos,et al.  ECOLOGICAL CORRELATES OF NUMBER OF SUBDIGITAL LAMELLAE IN ANOLES , 1997 .

[20]  J. Cheverud,et al.  THE QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF PHYLOGENETIC CONSTRAINTS IN COMPARATIVE ANALYSES: SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN BODY WEIGHT AMONG PRIMATES , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  F James Rohlf A comment on phylogenetic correction. , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[22]  Liam J. Revell,et al.  PCCA: a program for phylogenetic canonical correlation analysis , 2008, Bioinform..

[23]  T. Gregory,et al.  Genome size and wing parameters in passerine birds , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  J. Felsenstein Phylogenies and quantitative characters , 1988 .

[25]  Theodore Garland,et al.  Phylogenetic Analysis of Covariance by Computer Simulation , 1993 .

[26]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  A COMMENT ON PHYLOGENETIC CORRECTION , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[27]  Dolph Schluter,et al.  ADAPTIVE RADIATION ALONG GENETIC LINES OF LEAST RESISTANCE , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[28]  T. Garland,et al.  Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[29]  Barbara R. Holland,et al.  Analysis of Phylogenetics and Evolution with R , 2007 .

[30]  E. Martins The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology, Paul H. Harvey, Mark D. Pagel. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1991), vii, + 239 Price $24.95 paperback , 1992 .

[31]  D. Schluter,et al.  LIKELIHOOD OF ANCESTOR STATES IN ADAPTIVE RADIATION , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[32]  Korbinian Strimmer,et al.  APE: Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R language , 2004, Bioinform..

[33]  H. Pontzer,et al.  Great ranging associated with greater reproductive investment in mammals , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  BRAIN STRUCTURE AND CORRELATION PATTERNS IN INSECTIVORA, CHIROPTERA, AND PRIMATES , 1984 .

[35]  T. Garland,et al.  Procedures for the Analysis of Comparative Data Using Phylogenetically Independent Contrasts , 1992 .

[36]  T. F. Hansen,et al.  TRANSLATING BETWEEN MICROEVOLUTIONARY PROCESS AND MACROEVOLUTIONARY PATTERNS: THE CORRELATION STRUCTURE OF INTERSPECIFIC DATA , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[37]  Luke J. Harmon,et al.  A phylogenetic approach to determining the importance of constraint on phenotypic evolution in the neotropical lizard Anolis cristatellus , 2007 .

[38]  Richard K. Burdick Linear Models in Statistics , 2001, Technometrics.

[39]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  MULTIVARIATE DISCRIMINATION BY SHAPE IN RELATION TO SIZE , 1981 .

[40]  T. Garland,et al.  TESTING FOR PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL IN COMPARATIVE DATA: BEHAVIORAL TRAITS ARE MORE LABILE , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[41]  C. Nunn,et al.  Comparative methods for studying primate adaptation and allometry , 2001 .

[42]  T. Garland,et al.  PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES OF THE CORRELATED EVOLUTION OF CONTINUOUS CHARACTERS: A SIMULATION STUDY , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[43]  M. Donoghue,et al.  Leaf Size, Sapling Allometry, and Corner's Rules: Phylogeny and Correlated Evolution in Maples (Acer) , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[44]  A. Grafen The phylogenetic regression. , 1989, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[45]  M. W. McCoy,et al.  Size correction: comparing morphological traits among populations and environments , 2006, Oecologia.

[46]  T. F. Hansen,et al.  Phylogenies and the Comparative Method: A General Approach to Incorporating Phylogenetic Information into the Analysis of Interspecific Data , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[47]  Jean Clobert,et al.  The evolution of demographic tactics in lizards: a test of some hypotheses concerning life history evolution , 1998 .

[48]  A. King,et al.  Phylogenetic Comparative Analysis: A Modeling Approach for Adaptive Evolution , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[49]  M. Pagel Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution , 1999, Nature.

[50]  J. Felsenstein Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[51]  A. Ives,et al.  Morphometrics of the Avian Small Intestine Compared with That of Nonflying Mammals: A Phylogenetic Approach , 2008, Physiological and Biochemical Zoology.

[52]  M. Pagel,et al.  Phylogenetic Analysis and Comparative Data: A Test and Review of Evidence , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[53]  Michael J. Sanderson,et al.  TESTING FOR DIFFERENT RATES OF CONTINUOUS TRAIT EVOLUTION USING LIKELIHOOD , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[54]  R. Freckleton The seven deadly sins of comparative analysis , 2009, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[55]  Robert P. Freckleton,et al.  On the misuse of residuals in ecology: regression of residuals vs. multiple regression , 2002 .

[56]  L. Revell,et al.  Phylogenetic signal, evolutionary process, and rate. , 2008, Systematic biology.

[57]  Emília P. Martins,et al.  Estimating the Rate of Phenotypic Evolution from Comparative Data , 1994, The American Naturalist.