Relationship between Construction Firm Strategies and Innovation Outcomes

Survey results provide a preliminary assessment of the relative contribution of a range of tactical business strategies to innovation performance by firms in the Australian construction industry. Over 1,300 firms were surveyed in 2004, resulting in a response rate of 29%. Respondents were classified as high, medium or low innovators according to an innovation index based on the novelty and impact of their innovations and their adoption of listed technological and organizational advances. The relative significance of 23 business strategies concerning (1) employees; (2) marketing; (3) technology; (4) knowledge; and (5) relationships was examined by determining the extent to which they distinguished high innovators from low innovators. The individual business strategies that most strongly distinguished high innovators were (1) investing in RD (2) participating in partnering and alliances on projects; (3) ensuring project learnings are transferred into continuous business processes; (4) monitoring international best practice; and (5) recruiting new graduates. Of the five types of strategies assessed, marketing strategies were the least significant in supporting innovation. The results provide practical guidance to managers in project-based industries wishing to improve their innovation performance.

[1]  Henry Mintzberg.  Musings on management. Ten ideas designed to rile everyone who cares about management. , 1996, Harvard business review.

[2]  Mohammed Fadhil Dulaimi,et al.  Empowering innovative improvements through creative construction procurement , 2001 .

[3]  D. Gann,et al.  Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: the construction of complex products and systems , 2000 .

[4]  Graham Winch,et al.  Zephyrs of creative destruction: understanding the management of innovation in construction , 1998 .

[5]  Steven T. Walsh,et al.  The measurement of technical competencies , 2002 .

[6]  Ina Drejer,et al.  Organisation, ‘anchoring’ of knowledge, and innovative activity in construction , 2006 .

[7]  Martin Sexton,et al.  A literature synthesis of innovation in small construction firms: insights, ambiguities and questions , 2003 .

[8]  Steven Klepper,et al.  A Reprise of Size and R & D , 1996 .

[9]  Clyde B. Tatum,et al.  Leaders and champions for construction innovation , 1997 .

[10]  Sally Davenport,et al.  Exploring the role of proximity in SME knowledge-acquisition , 2005 .

[11]  J. Nash,et al.  Strategic decisions and innovation in construction firms , 2003 .

[12]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[13]  J. Barney,et al.  The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991 , 2001 .

[14]  Fiona Williams,et al.  Measuring the economic benefits from R&D: improvements in the MMI model of the United Kingdom National Measurement System , 2003 .

[15]  Michael J. Cooper,et al.  Measuring innovation. , 2011, Healthcare executive.

[16]  M. Lessnoff.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1979 .

[17]  Mette Præst Knudsen,et al.  Patterns of technological competence accumulation: a proposition for empirical measurement , 2005 .

[18]  M. Hardie,et al.  Experience with the management of technological innovations within the australian construction industry , 2005, A Unifying Discipline for Melting the Boundaries Technology Management:.

[19]  Andreas Hartmann,et al.  The context of innovation management in construction firms , 2006 .

[20]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation , 1992 .

[21]  J. Barlow,et al.  Innovation and learning in complex offshore construction projects , 2000 .

[22]  J. Fairclough,et al.  RETHINKING CONSTRUCTION INNOVATION AND RESEARCH - A REVIEW OF THE GOVERNMENT'S R&D POLICIES AND PRACTICES , 2002 .

[23]  Karen Manley,et al.  Frameworks for Understanding Interactive Innovation Processes , 2003 .

[24]  A. Manseau,et al.  Public policy and construction innovation , 2001 .

[25]  Ruby P. Lee,et al.  Information Use and New Product Outcomes: The Contingent Role of Strategy Type , 2007 .

[26]  John Roberts,et al.  The nature of lead users and measurement of leading edge status , 2004 .

[27]  M. Porter.  What is strategy , 2000 .

[28]  Karen Manley,et al.  The innovation competence of repeat public sector clients in the Australian construction industry , 2006 .

[29]  E. Sarah Slaughter,et al.  Models of Construction Innovation , 1998 .

[30]  Karen Manley,et al.  Key influences on construction innovation , 2004 .

[31]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  A model for supporting inter-organizational relations in the supply chain , 2002 .

[32]  Paul Dewick,et al.  Building competitive advantage: innovation and corporate governance in European construction , 2002 .

[33]  Ashok Jashapara,et al.  Organisational learning and inter-firm 'partnering' in the UK construction industry. , 1998 .

[34]  R. Solow.  A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth , 1956 .

[35]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[36]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The core competence of the corporation’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. pp. . , 1990 .

[37]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  The Oxford handbook of innovation , 2006 .

[38]  Karen Manley,et al.  Exploring the drivers of firm‐level innovation in the construction industry , 2006 .

[39]  Keith D. Hampson,et al.  Building constructive innovation networks: role of relationship management , 2007 .

[40]  Robert M. Deiters.  Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). , 1968 .

[41]  W. Powell.  Learning from Collaboration: Knowledge and Networks in the Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Industries , 1998 .

[42]  D. Schendel,et al.  An empirical analysis of strategy types , 1983 .