Translating standards into practice: Experience and lessons learned at the Department of Veterans Affairs

The increased need for interoperable electronic health records in health care organizations underscores the importance of standards. The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has a long history of developing and adopting various types of health care data standards. The authors present in detail their experience in this domain. A formal organization within VA is responsible for helping to develop and implement standards. This group has produced a Standards Life Cycle (SLC) process endorsed by VA key business and information technology (IT) stakeholders. It coordinates the identification, description, and implementation of standards aligned with VA business requirements. In this paper, we review the adoption of four standards in the categories of security and privacy, terminology, health information exchange, and modeling tools; emphasizing the implementation approach used in each. In our experience, adoption is facilitated by internal staff with expertise in standards development and adoption. Use of processes such as an SLC and tools such as an enterprise requirement repository help formally track and ensure that IT development and acquisition incorporate these standards. An organization should adopt standards that are aligned with its business priorities and favor those that are more readily implementable. To assist with this final point, we offer a standard "Likelihood of Adoption Scale," which changes as standards specifications evolve from PDF documents only, to PDF documents with construction and testing tools, to fully functional reference implementations.

[1]  Lyn Hanmer MEDINFO 2010 - 13th World Congress on Medical and Health Informatics , 2009 .

[2]  Nhan Do,et al.  Application of Information Technology: Exchange of Computable Patient Data between the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the Department of Defense (DoD): Terminology Mediation Strategy , 2008, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[3]  Eric C. Pan,et al.  The value of health care information exchange and interoperability. , 2005, Health affairs.

[4]  Kensaku Kawamoto,et al.  Model Formulation: The HL7-OMG Healthcare Services Specification Project: Motivation, Methodology, and Deliverables for Enabling a Semantically Interoperable Service-oriented Architecture for Healthcare , 2009, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[5]  Omar Bouhaddou,et al.  The Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Defense, and Kaiser Permanente Nationwide Health Information Network exchange in San Diego: patient selection, consent, and identity matching. , 2011, AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium.

[6]  Blackford Middleton,et al.  Viewpoint Paper: Accelerating U.S. EHR Adoption: How to Get There From Here. Recommendations Based on the 2004 ACMI Retreat , 2005, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[7]  Gail Graham,et al.  A Simple Strategy for Implementing Standard Reference Terminologies in a Distributed Healthcare Delivery System with Minimal Impact to Existing Applications , 2006, AMIA.

[8]  Blackford Middleton,et al.  The value from investments in health information technology at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. , 2010, Health affairs.

[9]  K. Mandl,et al.  Patients treated at multiple acute health care facilities: quantifying information fragmentation. , 2010, Archives of internal medicine.

[10]  P. Aspden Patient Safety: Achieving a New Standard for Care , 2004 .

[11]  David Carlson,et al.  A Model-Driven Approach for Biomedical Data Integration , 2010, MedInfo.