The locative alternation: Distinguishing linguistic processing cost from error signals in Broca's region

The left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) is known to be involved in the processing of syntactic complexity, such as word order variation. It is also known to be involved in semantic interpretation in studies of various types of semantic and pragmatic anomalies. Across neuroimaging studies of language processing, two main approaches can be found, one that contrasts anomalous and well-formed words or sentences in order to yield an error response and one that contrasts two well-formed syntactic structures differing in complexity, investigating effects of increased integration costs. The present fMRI study aimed at disentangling the error signal from the processing cost signal in LIFG. To do so, we examined the so-called Locative Alternation, which involves the contrast between the Content-Locative construction, e.g. He sprays paint on the wall, and the Container-Locative construction, e.g. He sprays the wall with paint, which have been argued to differ in processing. By including asymmetric verbs, e.g. He blocks the road with rocks vs. *He blocks rocks on the road, we were able to study the contrast between well formed and anomalous constructions. Participants performed an acceptability judgment task during fMRI. The results showed that increased syntactic integration costs yielded both increased response time as well as LIFG activation. Anomalous sentences yielded low acceptability rating but no increase in response time, yet they also evoked increased LIFG activation. Thus, the processing cost and the error signal were found to be functionally independent, but spatially overlapping in the brain.

[1]  M. Honda,et al.  The role of rostral Brodmann area 6 in mental-operation tasks: an integrative neuroimaging approach. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  Yosef Grodzinsky,et al.  Neural correlates of syntactic movement: converging evidence from two fMRI experiments , 2004, NeuroImage.

[3]  S. Bookheimer Functional MRI of language: new approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. , 2002, Annual review of neuroscience.

[4]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  Toward a cognitive semantics, Vol. 1: Concept structuring systems. , 2000 .

[5]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[6]  Maya Arad,et al.  The Spray‐Load Alternation , 2007 .

[7]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  Processing linguistic complexity and grammaticality in the left frontal cortex. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  Paul M. Matthews,et al.  Left Inferior Prefrontal Cortex Activity Reflects Inhibitory Rather Than Facilitatory Priming , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  Peter T. Fox,et al.  Broca's Area , 2002 .

[10]  Liliane Haegeman,et al.  Elements of Grammar: Handbook In Generative Syntax , 1998 .

[11]  C. Marshuetz,et al.  Order information in working memory: an integrative review of evidence from brain and behavior. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  N. Alpert,et al.  Localization of Syntactic Comprehension by Positron Emission Tomography , 1996, Brain and Language.

[13]  J. Trueswell,et al.  Cognitive control and parsing: Reexamining the role of Broca’s area in sentence comprehension , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[14]  S. Pinker Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure , 1989 .

[15]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  N400-like Magnetoencephalography Responses Modulated by Semantic Context, Word Frequency, and Lexical Class in Sentences , 2002, NeuroImage.

[16]  Y. Grodzinsky The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca's area , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  Robert Lindenberg,et al.  “Broca’s area” as a collective term? , 2007, Brain and Language.

[18]  Joseph A Maldjian,et al.  Precentral gyrus discrepancy in electronic versions of the Talairach atlas , 2004, NeuroImage.

[19]  Roel M. Willems,et al.  When language meets action: the neural integration of gesture and speech. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[20]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  The emergence of the unmarked: A new perspective on the language‐specific function of Broca's area , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[21]  Martin Everaert,et al.  The Blackwell Companion to Syntax , 2006 .

[22]  S. Pinker The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature , 2007 .

[23]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Who did what to whom? The neural basis of argument hierarchies during language comprehension , 2005, NeuroImage.

[24]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[25]  David Kemmerer,et al.  Grammatically relevant and grammatically irrelevant features of verb meaning can be independently impaired , 2000 .

[26]  Yosef Grodzinsky,et al.  Neuroimaging of syntax and syntactic processing , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[27]  T Inui,et al.  A functional MRI analysis of comprehension processes of Japanese sentences , 1998, Neuroreport.

[28]  Beth Levin,et al.  Argument Realization: Acknowledgments , 2005 .

[29]  T. Hendler,et al.  The Neural Reality of Syntactic Transformations , 2003, Psychological science.

[30]  Ken Ramshøj Christensen Syntactic reconstruction and reanalysis, semantic dead ends, and prefrontal cortex , 2010, Brain and Cognition.

[31]  F. Pulvermüller Brain reflections of words and their meaning , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  Bradley L. Pritchett Grammatical Competence and Parsing Performance , 1992 .

[33]  D. Kemmerer,et al.  The Two-Level Theory of verb meaning: An approach to integrating the semantics of action with the mirror neuron system , 2010, Brain and Language.

[34]  C. Büchel,et al.  Event-Related fMRI Reveals Cortical Sites Involved in Contextual Sentence Integration , 2002, NeuroImage.

[35]  Heiner Drenhaus,et al.  Distinguishing Process from Content in Language Processing: a new answer to an old question , 2004 .

[36]  Douglas Saddy,et al.  Processing polarity items: Contrastive licensing costs , 2004, Brain and Language.

[37]  J. Nicol,et al.  On the Distinctiveness, Independence, and Time Course of the Brain Responses to Syntactic and Semantic Anomalies. , 1999 .

[38]  L. Haegeman Elements of Grammar , 1997 .

[39]  A. Nakamura,et al.  Localizing the distributed language network responsible for the N400 measured by MEG during auditory sentence processing , 2006, Brain Research.

[40]  Mikkel Wallentin,et al.  Putative sex differences in verbal abilities and language cortex: A critical review , 2009, Brain and Language.

[41]  C. Fiebach,et al.  Neural Correlates of Syntactic Ambiguity in Sentence Comprehension for Low and High Span Readers , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  J. Kimball Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language , 1973 .

[43]  A. Friederici Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[44]  R. Larson Double Objects Revisited: Reply to Jackendoff , 1990 .

[45]  Fernanda Ferreira,et al.  Reanalysis in sentence processing , 1998 .

[46]  Neil Burgess,et al.  Parallel memory systems for talking about location and age in precuneus, caudate and Broca's region , 2006, NeuroImage.

[47]  F. Rösler,et al.  Brain Activation Modulated by the Comprehension of Normal and Pseudo-word Sentences of Different Processing Demands: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[48]  Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky,et al.  Word order and Broca’s region: Evidence for a supra-syntactic perspective , 2009, Brain and Language.

[49]  Sharlene D. Newman,et al.  Differential effects of syntactic and semantic processing on the subregions of Broca's area. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[50]  R. Larson On the double object construction , 1988 .

[51]  Ken Ramshøj Christensen Interfaces, syntactic movement, and neural activation: A new perspective on the implementation of language in the brain , 2008, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[52]  C. Fiebach,et al.  The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: localizing syntactic and semantic processes. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[53]  A. Dale,et al.  Distinct Patterns of Neural Modulation during the Processing of Conceptual and Syntactic Anomalies , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[54]  Beth Levin,et al.  English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation , 1993 .

[55]  C. Fiebach,et al.  Revisiting the role of Broca's area in sentence processing: Syntactic integration versus syntactic working memory , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[56]  P. Hagoort On Broca, brain, and binding: a new framework , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[57]  益子 真由美 Argument Structure , 1993, The Lexicon.

[58]  M. Just,et al.  Brain Activation Modulated by Sentence Comprehension , 1996, Science.

[59]  Marcel Adam Just,et al.  Ambiguity in the brain: what brain imaging reveals about the processing of syntactically ambiguous sentences. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[60]  Lincoln Ward Cutting Semantic Parameters of Basque Split Intransitivity in Role and Reference Grammar , 1994 .

[61]  S. Bookheimer,et al.  Form and Content Dissociating Syntax and Semantics in Sentence Comprehension , 1999, Neuron.

[62]  Peter Svenonius,et al.  Limits on P: filling in holes vs. falling in holes , 2003 .

[63]  Mark C. Baker,et al.  Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure , 1997 .

[64]  L. Aravind,et al.  Integration of Word Meaning and World Knowledge in Language Comprehension , 2022 .

[65]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets , 2003, NeuroImage.

[66]  A. A. Wijers,et al.  Localizing components of a complex task: sentence processing and working memory , 1998, Neuroreport.