Light Energy Dose and Photosensitizer Concentration Are Determinants of Effective Photo-Killing against Caries-Related Biofilms

Caries-related biofilms and associated complications are significant threats in dentistry, especially when biofilms grow over dental restorations. The inhibition of cariogenic biofilm associated with the onset of carious lesions is crucial for preventing disease recurrence after treatment. This in vitro study defined optimized parameters for using a photosensitizer, toluidine blue O (TBO), activated via a red light-emitting diode (LED)-based wireless device to control the growth of cariogenic biofilms. The effect of TBO concentrations (50, 100, 150, and 200 μg/mL) exposed to light or incubated in the dark was investigated in successive cytotoxicity assays. Then, a mature Streptococcus mutans biofilm model under sucrose challenge was treated with different TBO concentrations (50, 100, and 150 μg/mL), different light energy doses (36, 108, and 180 J/cm2), and different incubation times before irradiation (1, 3, and 5 min). The untreated biofilm, irradiation with no TBO, and TBO incubation with no activation represented the controls. After treatments, biofilms were analyzed via S. mutans colony-forming units (CFUs) and live/dead assay. The percentage of cell viability was within the normal range compared to the control when 50 and 100 μg/mL of TBO were used. Increasing the TBO concentration and energy dose was associated with biofilm inhibition (p < 0.001), while increasing incubation time did not contribute to bacterial elimination (p > 0.05). Irradiating the S. mutans biofilm via 100 μg/mL of TBO and ≈180 J/cm2 energy dose resulted in ≈3-log reduction and a higher amount of dead/compromised S. mutans colonies in live/dead assay compared to the control (p < 0.001). The light energy dose and TBO concentration optimized the bacterial elimination of S. mutans biofilms. These results provide a perspective on the determining parameters for highly effective photo-killing of caries-related biofilms and display the limitations imposed by the toxicity of the antibacterial photodynamic therapy’s chemical components. Future studies should support investigations on new approaches to improve or overcome the constraints of opportunities offered by photodynamic inactivation of caries-related biofilms.

[1]  M. Weir,et al.  Emerging Contact-Killing Antibacterial Strategies for Developing Anti-Biofilm Dental Polymeric Restorative Materials , 2020, Bioengineering.

[2]  J. Scholten,et al.  Quantum chemistry study of the interaction between ionic liquid-functionalized TiO2 quantum dots and methacrylate resin: Implications for dental materials. , 2020, Biophysical chemistry.

[3]  F. Martinho,et al.  Prospects on Nano-Based Platforms for Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy Against Oral Biofilms. , 2020, Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery.

[4]  M. Weir,et al.  Concentration dependence of quaternary ammonium monomer on the design of high-performance bioactive composite for root caries restorations. , 2020, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[5]  Xuedong Zhou,et al.  Sucrose promotes caries progression by disrupting the microecological balance in oral biofilms: an in vitro study , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[6]  Linda T. Senbanjo,et al.  C-phycocyanin attenuates RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption in vitro through inhibiting ROS levels, NFATc1 and NF-κB activation , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[7]  G. Eckert,et al.  Photoinhibition of Streptococcus mutans Biofilm-Induced Lesions in Human Dentin by Violet-Blue Light , 2019, Dentistry journal.

[8]  Shuhei Naka,et al.  Specific strains of Streptococcus mutans, a pathogen of dental caries, in the tonsils, are associated with IgA nephropathy , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[9]  Tymish Y. Ohulchanskyy,et al.  LED-based portable light source for photodynamic therapy , 2019 .

[10]  F. L. Brighenti,et al.  Effect of Photodynamic Therapy on Microorganisms Responsible for Dental Caries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2019, International journal of molecular sciences.

[11]  L. K. Rodrigues,et al.  Scientific evidence in antimicrobial photodynamic therapy: An alternative approach for reducing cariogenic bacteria. , 2019, Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy.

[12]  F. Visioli,et al.  Quaternary ammonium compound as antimicrobial agent in resin-based sealants , 2019, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[13]  W. Teughels,et al.  Secondary caries: prevalence, characteristics, and approach , 2019, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[14]  Min-Ho Lee,et al.  Sucrose challenges to Streptococcus mutans biofilms and the curve fitting for the biofilm changes , 2018, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[15]  A. Al-Ahmad,et al.  Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy – what we know and what we don’t , 2018, Critical reviews in microbiology.

[16]  M. Grinholc,et al.  Combined Antimicrobial Activity of Photodynamic Inactivation and Antimicrobials–State of the Art , 2018, Front. Microbiol..

[17]  M. Borsatto,et al.  Effect of aPDT on Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans present in the dental biofilm: Systematic review. , 2018, Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy.

[18]  H. Darmani,et al.  Comparison of the Photosensitivity of Biofilms of Different Genera of Cariogenic Bacteria in Tooth Slices , 2018, Polish journal of microbiology.

[19]  S. Ghadimi,et al.  Effect of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy on the counts of salivary Streptococcus mutans in children with severe early childhood caries. , 2017, Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy.

[20]  Michael R Hamblin,et al.  Antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation: a bright new technique to kill resistant microbes. , 2016, Current opinion in microbiology.

[21]  S. Ahn,et al.  Understanding the Streptococcus mutans Cid/Lrg System through CidB Function , 2016, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[22]  Xuedong Zhou,et al.  l-Arginine Modifies the Exopolysaccharide Matrix and Thwarts Streptococcus mutans Outgrowth within Mixed-Species Oral Biofilms , 2016, Journal of bacteriology.

[23]  Asad U. Khan,et al.  Antibiofilm action of a toluidine blue O-silver nanoparticle conjugate on Streptococcus mutans: a mechanism of type I photodynamic therapy , 2016, Biofouling.

[24]  L. Rodrigues,et al.  Photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy and ultraconservative caries removal linked for management of deep caries lesions. , 2015, Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy.

[25]  E. Breukink,et al.  Antibacterial photodynamic therapy: overview of a promising approach to fight antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections , 2015, Journal of clinical and translational research.

[26]  Ana Cecília Corrêa Aranha,et al.  Randomized in vivo evaluation of photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy on deciduous carious dentin , 2015, Journal of biomedical optics.

[27]  A. Mitani,et al.  Adjunctive Application of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy in Nonsurgical Periodontal Treatment: A Review of Literature , 2015, International journal of molecular sciences.

[28]  I. García-Luque,et al.  In vitro effect photodynamic therapy with differents photosensitizers on cariogenic microorganisms , 2015, BMC Microbiology.

[29]  A. Cataldi,et al.  A dual role for β1 integrin in an in vitro Streptococcus mitis/human gingival fibroblasts co-culture model in response to TEGDMA. , 2015, International endodontic journal.

[30]  V. Bakken,et al.  Biofilm and Dental Biomaterials , 2015, Materials.

[31]  Thomas Bjarnsholt,et al.  Interactions in multispecies biofilms: do they actually matter? , 2014, Trends in microbiology.

[32]  J. Radosevich,et al.  Photodynamic therapy: occupational hazards and preventative recommendations for clinical administration by healthcare providers. , 2013, Photomedicine and laser surgery.

[33]  L. Rodrigues,et al.  Characterization of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy-treated Streptococci mutans: an atomic force microscopy study. , 2013, Photomedicine and laser surgery.

[34]  K. Moghissi,et al.  Photodynamic Therapy (PDT): PDT Mechanisms , 2013, Clinical endoscopy.

[35]  Ehud Banin,et al.  Multi-species biofilms: living with friendly neighbors. , 2012, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[36]  M. Baesso,et al.  Antibacterial photodynamic therapy for dental caries: evaluation of the photosensitizers used and light source properties. , 2012, Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy.

[37]  L. Rodrigues,et al.  The antimicrobial activity of photodynamic therapy against Streptococcus mutans using different photosensitizers. , 2012, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[38]  Mingyun Li,et al.  Bacterial interactions in dental biofilm , 2011, Virulence.

[39]  L. Rodrigues,et al.  In vitro assessment of thermal changes in human teeth during photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy performed with red light sources , 2010 .

[40]  L. Rodrigues,et al.  Evaluation of the antimicrobial effect of photodynamic antimicrobial therapy in an in situ model of dentine caries. , 2009, European journal of oral sciences.

[41]  W. Gallagher,et al.  Porphyrin and Nonporphyrin Photosensitizers in Oncology: Preclinical and Clinical Advances in Photodynamic Therapy , 2009, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[42]  R. Burne,et al.  A model of efficiency: stress tolerance by Streptococcus mutans. , 2008, Microbiology.

[43]  L. Pimenta,et al.  Photosensitization of in vitro biofilms by toluidine blue O combined with a light-emitting diode. , 2006, European journal of oral sciences.

[44]  F. Gad,et al.  Photodynamic therapy with toluidine blue in Jurkat cells: cytotoxicity, subcellular localization and apoptosis induction , 2002, Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology.