Results of a comparative study analyzing octogenarians with renal cell carcinoma in a competing risk analysis with patients in the seventh decade of life.

[1]  C. Stief,et al.  Gender differences in clinicopathological features and survival in surgically treated patients with renal cell carcinoma: an analysis of the multicenter CORONA database , 2013, World Journal of Urology.

[2]  F. Montorsi,et al.  Comparison of partial vs radical nephrectomy with regard to other‐cause mortality in T1 renal cell carcinoma among patients aged ≥75 years with multiple comorbidities , 2013, BJU international.

[3]  F. Zhou,et al.  Impact of Age on the Cancer-Specific Survival of Patients with Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: Martingale Residual and Competing Risks Analysis , 2012, PloS one.

[4]  J. Patard,et al.  Detailed analysis of morbidity following nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma in octogenarians. , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[5]  J. Patard,et al.  Overall mortality after radical nephrectomy in patients aged over 80 years with renal cancer: A retrospective study on preoperative prognostic factors , 2012, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[6]  Elizabeth A. Chrischilles,et al.  Comparison of instrumental variable analysis using a new instrument with risk adjustment methods to reduce confounding by indication. , 2012, American journal of epidemiology.

[7]  N. Hellenthal,et al.  Renal cell carcinoma in octogenarians: nephron sparing surgery should remain the standard of care. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[8]  Lorenzo Marconi,et al.  EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. , 2010, European urology.

[9]  Jean-Jacques Patard,et al.  EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update. , 2010, European urology.

[10]  J. Patard,et al.  Age at diagnosis is a determinant factor of renal cell carcinoma-specific survival in patients treated with nephrectomy. , 2008, Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada.

[11]  F. Guillé,et al.  Relationship between age at diagnosis and clinicopathologic features of renal cell carcinoma. , 2007, European urology.

[12]  A. Hartmann,et al.  Sporadic renal cell carcinoma in young and elderly patients: are there different clinicopathological features and disease specific survival rates? , 2007, World journal of surgical oncology.

[13]  A. Dueñas-González,et al.  Primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenocarcinoma: report of two cases , 2007, World journal of surgical oncology.

[14]  J. Cheville,et al.  Comparison of presentation and outcome for patients 18 to 40 and 60 to 70 years old with solid renal masses. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[15]  N. Demartines,et al.  Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal With Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey , 2004, Annals of Surgery.

[16]  Robert Gray,et al.  A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk , 1999 .

[17]  Holger Moch,et al.  The Heidelberg classification of renal cell tumours , 1997, The Journal of pathology.

[18]  F. Harrell,et al.  Prognostic/Clinical Prediction Models: Multivariable Prognostic Models: Issues in Developing Models, Evaluating Assumptions and Adequacy, and Measuring and Reducing Errors , 2005 .

[19]  Beahrs Oh,et al.  The American Joint Committee on Cancer. , 1984 .

[20]  S. Fuhrman,et al.  Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma , 1982, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[21]  J. Newhouse,et al.  Econometrics in outcomes research: the use of instrumental variables. , 1998, Annual review of public health.