Limbic frontal cortex in hominoids: a comparative study of area 13.

The limbic frontal cortex forms part of the neural substrate responsible for emotional reactions to social stimuli. Area 13 is one of the cortical areas long known to be part of the posterior orbitofrontal cortex in several monkey species, such as the macaque. Its presence nevertheless in the human brain has been unclear, and the cortex of the frontal lobe of the great and lesser apes remains largely unknown. In this study area 13 was identified in human, chimpanzee, bonobo, gorilla, orangutan, and gibbon brains, and cortical maps were generated on the basis of its cytoarchitecture. Imaging techniques were used to characterize and quantify the microstructural organization of the area, and stereological tools were applied for estimates of the volume of area 13 in all species. Area 13 is conservative in its structure, and features such as size of cortical layers, density of neurons, and space available for connections are similar across hominoids with only subtle differences present. In contrast to the homogeneity found in its organization, variation is present in the relative size of this cortical area (as a percentage of total brain volume). The human and the bonobo include a complex orbitofrontal cortex and a relatively smaller area 13. On the contrary the orangutan stands out by having a shorter orbitofrontal region and a more expanded area 13. Differences in the organization and size of individual cortical areas involved in emotional reactions and social behavior can be related to behavioral specializations of each hominoid and to the evolution of emotions in hominids.

[1]  K Zilles,et al.  A quantitative approach to cytoarchitectonics: Analysis of structural inhomogeneities in nervous tissue using an image analyser , 1990, Journal of microscopy.

[2]  D. Pandya,et al.  Architecture and intrinsic connections of the prefrontal cortex in the rhesus monkey , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[3]  H. Stephan.  VERGLEICHEND-ANATOMISCHE UNTERSUCHUNGEN AN INSEKTIVORENGEHIRNEN. V. , 1961 .

[4]  Karl Zilles,et al.  Estimation of volume fractions in nervous tissue with an image analyzer , 1982, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[5]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Myelo‐ and cytoarchitecture of the granular frontal cortex and surrounding regions in the strepsirhine primate Galago and the anthropoid primate Macaca , 1991, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[6]  D. R. Snyder,et al.  Alterations in aversive and aggressive behaviors following orbital frontal lesions in rhesus monkeys. , 1972, Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis.

[7]  H. J. G. GUNDERSEN,et al.  Some new, simple and efficient stereological methods and their use in pathological research and diagnosis , 1988, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.

[8]  P S Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Cytoarchitectonic definition of prefrontal areas in the normal human cortex: I. Remapping of areas 9 and 46 using quantitative criteria. , 1995, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  H. Gundersen,et al.  Unbiased stereological estimation of the total number of neurons in the subdivisions of the rat hippocampus using the optical fractionator , 1991, The Anatomical record.

[10]  G. Bonin,et al.  The isocortex of man , 1951 .

[11]  H. Gundersen,et al.  Unbiased stereological estimation of the number of neurons in the human hippocampus , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[12]  F. Gallyas,et al.  A principle for silver staining of tissue elements by physical development. , 1971, Acta morphologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae.

[13]  Warren S. McCulloch,et al.  The isocortex of the chimpanzee. , 1950 .

[14]  F. Sanides.  Die Architektonik des Menschlichen Stirnhirns , 1962 .

[15]  H. J. G. Gundersen,et al.  The new stereological tools: Disector, fractionator, nucleator and point sampled intercepts and their use in pathological research and diagnosis , 1988, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.

[16]  G. V. Hoesen,et al.  The parahippocampal gyrus: New observations regarding its cortical connections in the monkey , 1982, Trends in Neurosciences.

[17]  G. V. Van Hoesen,et al.  The evolution of the frontal lobes: a volumetric analysis based on three-dimensional reconstructions of magnetic resonance scans of human and ape brains. , 1997, Journal of human evolution.

[18]  K Zilles,et al.  Quantitative cytoarchitectonics of the posterior cingulate cortex in primates , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[19]  Jelliffe.  Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Grosshirnrinde , 1910 .

[20]  A. Damasio,et al.  Individuals with sociopathic behavior caused by frontal damage fail to respond autonomically to social stimuli , 1990, Behavioural Brain Research.

[21]  B. Merker.  Silver staining of cell bodies by means of physical development , 1983, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[22]  E. Beck.  A cytoarchitectural investigation into the boundaries of cortical areas 13 and 14 in the human brain. , 1949, Journal of anatomy.

[23]  C. Economo,et al.  Die Cytoarchitektonik der Hirnrinde des erwachsenen Menschen , 1925 .

[24]  C. Schaik,et al.  Great Ape Societies: Toward an understanding of the orangutan's social system , 1996 .

[25]  E. Armstrong.  1 – Evolution of the Brain , 1990 .

[26]  N Butters,et al.  Cortical Afferents to the Entorhinal Cortex of the Rhesus Monkey , 1972, Science.

[27]  R. Holloway,.  The evolution of the primate brain: some aspects of quantitative relations. , 1968, Brain research.

[28]  John C. Eccles.  Evolution of the Brain , 1969 .

[29]  H. D. Steklis,et al.  A neural substrate for affiliative behavior in nonhuman primates. , 1976, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[30]  A. Damasio,et al.  Severe disturbance of higher cognition after bilateral frontal lobe ablation , 1985, Neurology.

[31]  A. Schleicher,et al.  Comparative aspects of the primate posterior cingulate cortex , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[32]  G. Bonin,et al.  The neocortex of Macaca mulatta , 1947 .

[33]  Filippo Aureli,et al.  Consolation, reconciliation, and a possible cognitive difference between macaques and chimpanzees , 1996 .

[34]  Deepak N. Pandya,et al.  Some connections of the entorhinal (area 28) and perirhinal (area 35) cortices of the rhesus monkey. III. Efferent connections , 1975, Brain Research.

[35]  H. Frahm,et al.  New and revised data on volumes of brain structures in insectivores and primates. , 1981, Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology.

[36]  Patricia S. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  The frontal lobes: Uncharted provinces of the brain , 1984, Trends in Neurosciences.

[37]  C. Geula,et al.  Cytoarchitecture and neural afferents of orbitofrontal cortex in the brain of the monkey , 1992, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[38]  J. Price,et al.  Architectonic subdivision of the orbital and medial prefrontal cortex in the macaque monkey , 1994, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[39]  A. Walker,et al.  A cytoarchitectural study of the prefrontal area of the macaque monkey , 1940 .

[40]  E. Armstrong,et al.  A quantitative comparison of the hominoid thalamus: II. Limbic nuclei anterior principalis and lateralis dorsalis. , 1980, American journal of physical anthropology.

[41]  F. Sanides.  THE CYTO-MYELOARCHITECTURE OF THE HUMAN FRONTAL LOBE AND ITS RELATION TO PHYLOGENETIC DIFFERENTIATION OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX. , 1964, Journal fur Hirnforschung.

[42]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Cytoarchitectonic definition of prefrontal areas in the normal human cortex: II. Variability in locations of areas 9 and 46 and relationship to the Talairach Coordinate System. , 1995, Cerebral cortex.