Teaching-learning self-study approach for optimal retrofitting of dual mixed refrigerant LNG process: Energy and exergy perspective

Abstract This study unfolds the advanced process configuration modification in the evolution of a dual mixed refrigerant (DMR) process for natural gas liquefaction, followed by its optimization through a unique approach i.e., teaching–learning self-study optimization (TLSO). The DMR process is improved by replacing Joule Thomson valves with the isentropic cryogenic turbines. To ensure the maximum possible thermodynamic performance of the retrofitted DMR process, the TLSO paradigm is used and evaluated. The energy, exergy, coefficient of performance, and figure of merit are determined and compared with conventional bench-scale DMR process to find the performance improvement opportunities in the proposed cryogenic turbine-retrofitted DMR process. The performance analysis revealed that the proposed optimal retrofitted DMR process could produce LNG using 28.57% less energy than the base case. The detailed thermodynamic evaluation revealed that the proposed DMR process has 64.68% exergy efficiency, 2.42 coefficient of performance, and 41.6% figure of merit, which are 13.37%, 19%, and 11.9%, higher than the conventional DMR process, respectively. This study would significantly help process engineers overcome the challenges of relating energy efficiency of the LNG plants for both onshore and offshore applications.

[1]  K. Ng,et al.  An exergy approach to efficiency evaluation of desalination , 2017 .

[2]  Brian Elmegaard,et al.  Assessment of thermodynamic models for the design, analysis and optimisation of gas liquefaction systems , 2016 .

[3]  Zuming Liu,et al.  A comprehensive optimization and comparison of modified single mixed refrigerant and parallel nitrogen expansion liquefaction process for small-scale mobile LNG plant , 2019, Energy.

[4]  Moonyong Lee,et al.  Comprehensive Review of the Design Optimization of Natural Gas Liquefaction Processes: Current Status and Perspectives , 2017 .

[5]  R. Venkata Rao,et al.  Teaching-learning-based optimization: A novel method for constrained mechanical design optimization problems , 2011, Comput. Aided Des..

[6]  Hui Han,et al.  Experimental tube-side pressure drop characteristics of FLNG spiral wound heat exchanger under sloshing conditions , 2017 .

[7]  Wensheng Lin,et al.  Design and optimization of offshore natural gas liquefaction processes adopting PLNG (pressurized liquefied natural gas) technology , 2016 .

[8]  Xinggao Liu,et al.  Melt index prediction by least squares support vector machines with an adaptive mutation fruit fly optimization algorithm , 2015 .

[9]  Peifeng Niu,et al.  Model NOx emissions by least squares support vector machine with tuning based on ameliorated teaching–learning-based optimization , 2013 .

[10]  Xiongwen Xu,et al.  The correlation between mixed refrigerant composition and ambient conditions in the PRICO LNG process , 2013 .

[11]  Emanuela Colombo,et al.  Low temperature techniques for natural gas purification and LNG production: An energy and exergy analysis , 2016 .

[12]  Gade Pandu Rangaiah,et al.  Knowledge based decision making method for the selection of mixed refrigerant systems for energy efficient LNG processes , 2013 .

[13]  Reinhard Radermacher,et al.  Optimization of propane pre-cooled mixed refrigerant LNG plant , 2011 .

[14]  Konstantinos Moustakas,et al.  Single-Solution-Based Vortex Search Strategy for Optimal Design of Offshore and Onshore Natural Gas Liquefaction Processes , 2020, Energies.

[16]  Xiaoli Zhang,et al.  An ACO-based algorithm for parameter optimization of support vector machines , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[17]  K. Deb.  An Efficient Constraint Handling Method for Genetic Algorithms , 2000 .

[18]  Hao Zhou,et al.  Computational intelligence approach for NOx emissions minimization in a coal-fired utility boiler , 2010 .

[19]  Farzad Abdollahi-Demneh,et al.  Calculating exergy in flowsheeting simulators: A HYSYS implementation , 2011 .

[20]  Finn Are Michelsen,et al.  Modeling and Simulation for Control of the TEALARC Liquified Natural Gas Process , 2010 .

[21]  Muhammad Abdul Qyyum,et al.  Impact of mixed refrigerant selection on energy and exergy performance of natural gas liquefaction processes , 2020 .

[22]  Muhammad Abdul Qyyum,et al.  Optimization of mixed fluid cascade LNG process using a multivariate Coggins step-up approach: Overall compression power reduction and exergy loss analysis , 2019, International Journal of Refrigeration.

[23]  P. I. Barton,et al.  Optimization of a dual mixed refrigerant process using a nonsmooth approach , 2020, Energy.

[24]  Inkyu Lee,et al.  Economic Optimization of Dual Mixed Refrigerant Liquefied Natural Gas Plant Considering Natural Gas Extraction Rate , 2017 .

[25]  M. Mehrpooya,et al.  Energy and exergy analyses of five conventional liquefied natural gas processes , 2014 .

[26]  Muhammad Abdul Qyyum,et al.  Weed colonization‐based performance improvement opportunities in dual‐mixed refrigerant natural gas liquefaction process , 2020, Energy Science & Engineering.

[27]  Mehdi Mehrpooya,et al.  A novel process configuration for co-production of NGL and LNG with low energy requirement , 2013 .

[28]  Faisal Ahmed,et al.  A Fast Converging and Consistent Teaching-Learning-Self-Study Algorithm for Optimization: A Case Study of Tuning of LSSVM Parameters for the Prediction of NOx Emissions from a Tangentially Fired Pulverized Coal Boiler , 2017 .

[29]  D. Peng,et al.  A New Two-Constant Equation of State , 1976 .

[30]  Chen Zhang,et al.  A study on the use of dual mixed refrigerant in a cascade dual mixed refrigerant cycle , 2017 .

[31]  Reinhard Radermacher,et al.  Novel combined cycle configurations for propane pre-cooled mixed refrigerant (APCI) natural gas liquefaction cycle , 2014 .

[32]  Iftekhar A. Karimi,et al.  Evolution and optimization of the dual mixed refrigerant process of natural gas liquefaction , 2016 .

[33]  M. Mehrpooya,et al.  Introducing a hybrid oxy-fuel power generation and natural gas/ carbon dioxide liquefaction process with thermodynamic and economic analysis , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[34]  Moonyong Lee,et al.  Dual mixed refrigerant LNG process: Uncertainty quantification and dimensional reduction sensitivity analysis , 2019, Applied Energy.

[35]  Yuli Amalia Husnil,et al.  Synthesis of an Optimizing Control Structure for Dual Mixed Refrigerant Process , 2014 .

[36]  Kyu-Yeul Lee,et al.  Determination of the optimal operating conditions of the dual mixed refrigerant cycle for the LNG FPSO topside liquefaction process , 2013, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[37]  Nguyen Van Duc Long,et al.  Novel retrofit designs using a modified coordinate descent methodology for improving energy efficiency of natural gas liquid fractionation process , 2016 .

[38]  Muhammad Abdul Qyyum,et al.  Coal to clean energy: Energy-efficient single-loop mixed-refrigerant-based schemes for the liquefaction of synthetic natural gas , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[39]  M. Roh,et al.  Optimal Design of Liquefaction Cycles of Liquefied Natural Gas Floating, Production, Storage, and Offloading Unit Considering Optimal Synthesis , 2013 .

[40]  S. Zubair,et al.  Exergoeconomic optimization of a shell-and-tube heat exchanger , 2020 .

[41]  Moonyong Lee,et al.  Energy efficiency enhancement of a single mixed refrigerant LNG process using a novel hydraulic turbine , 2018 .

[42]  Mehdi Mehrpooya,et al.  Advanced exergy and exergoeconomic analyses of a hydrogen liquefaction plant equipped with mixed refrigerant system , 2017 .

[43]  Ali Chamkalani,et al.  Integration of LSSVM technique with PSO to determine asphaltene deposition , 2014 .

[44]  I. Karimi,et al.  Review on the design and optimization of natural gas liquefaction processes for onshore and offshore applications , 2018 .

[45]  Muhammad Abdul Qyyum,et al.  Dual-effect single-mixed refrigeration cycle: An innovative alternative process for energy-efficient and cost-effective natural gas liquefaction , 2020 .