A Bi-Polar Theory of Nominal and Clause Structure and Function

It is taken as axiomatic that grammar encodes meaning. Two key dimensions of meaning that get grammatically encoded are referential meaning and relational meaning. The key claim is that, in English, these two dimensions of meaning are typically encoded in distinct grammatical poles—a referential pole and a relational pole—with a specifier functioning as the locus of the referential pole and a head functioning as the locus of the relational pole. Specifiers and heads combine to form referring expressions corresponding to the syntactic notion of a maximal projection. Lexical items and expressions functioning as modifiers are preferentially attracted to one pole or the other. If the head of an expression describes a relation, one or more complements may be associated with the head. The four grammatical functions specifier, head, modifier and complement are generally adequate to represent much of the basic structure and function of nominals and clauses. These terms are borrowed from X-Bar Theory, but they are motivated on semantic grounds having to do with their grammatical function to encode referential and relational meaning.

[1]  R. Borsley The Nature and Function of Syntactic Categories , 1999 .

[2]  A. Goldberg Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure , 1995 .

[3]  T. Givón,et al.  Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction , 1982 .

[4]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  SCENES- AND- FRAMES SEMANTICS. , 1977 .

[5]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Situation models in language comprehension and memory. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Effects of negation and situational presence on the accessibility of text information. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  C. Habel,et al.  Language , 1931, NeuroImage.

[8]  Liliana Albertazzi Meaning and cognition : a multidisciplinary approach , 2000 .

[9]  Bernd Heine,et al.  Cognitive Foundations of Grammar , 1997 .

[10]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[11]  M. Halliday,et al.  AN INTRODUCTION TO FUNCTIONAL GRAMMAR (Third Edition) , 2022 .

[12]  Roderick A. Jacobs,et al.  Readings in English transformational grammar , 1970 .

[13]  Robert D. van Valin,et al.  An Introduction to Syntax , 2001 .

[14]  Jan Svartvik,et al.  A __ comprehensive grammar of the English language , 1988 .

[15]  菅山 謙正,et al.  Word Grammar 理論の研究 , 2005 .

[16]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Making sense of nonce sense , 1983 .

[17]  Janos J. Sarbo,et al.  Coordination and multi-relational modelling: 'X and X' revisited , 1999 .

[18]  G. Pullum English nominal gerund phrases as noun phrases with verb-phrase heads , 1991 .

[19]  William Croft,et al.  Cognitive Linguistics , 2004 .

[20]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Long-term working memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[21]  Mark Newson,et al.  乔姆斯基的普遍语法教程 = Chomsky's universal grammar : an introduction : , 1988 .

[22]  Jerry T. Ball,et al.  Towards a Semantics of X-Bar Theory , 2003 .

[23]  András Kornai,et al.  The X-bar theory of phrase structure , 1990 .

[24]  R. Hudson Grammar Without Functional Categories , 1999 .

[25]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[26]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Remarks on Nominalization , 2020, Nominalization.

[27]  R. Borsley,et al.  Mixed Extended Projections , 1999 .

[28]  R. Jackendoff Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution , 2002 .

[29]  R. Langacker Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .

[30]  JOHN HEWSON,et al.  Determiners as heads , 1991 .

[31]  Ronnie Cann,et al.  Specifiers as secondary heads , 1999 .

[32]  Richard Hudson,et al.  Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume 1. Theoretical prerequisites , 1990 .

[33]  Francesco Orilia,et al.  Semantics and Cognition , 1991 .

[34]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  THE CASE FOR CASE. , 1967 .

[35]  Jerry T. Ball,et al.  Construction Driven Language Processing , 2005 .

[36]  Martin Kay,et al.  Syntactic Process , 1979, ACL.

[37]  R. Langacker,et al.  Meaning and the Structure of Language , 1972 .

[38]  Anna Wierzbicka The semantics of grammar , 1988 .

[39]  Steven Abney,et al.  The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect , 1972 .

[40]  C. F. Hockett A Course in Modern Linguistics , 1959 .

[41]  NOAM CHOMSKY,et al.  On the Representation of Form and Function , 1981 .

[42]  P. Johnson-Laird Mental models , 1989 .

[43]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[44]  S. Ariel,et al.  Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. , 1968 .

[45]  Z. Harris,et al.  Foundations of language , 1941 .

[46]  Willy Van Langendonck,et al.  Determiners as heads , 1994 .

[47]  Robert M. Dixon,et al.  A new approach to Eng-lish Grammar on semantic principles , 1991 .

[48]  Peter Sells,et al.  Lectures on contemporary syntactic theories , 1985 .

[49]  Maria Polinsky,et al.  Possessives in English , 1996 .

[50]  Jerry Thomas Ball,et al.  PM, propositional model, a computational psycholinguistic model of language comprehension based on a relational analysis of written English , 1992 .

[51]  Robert Malouf Verbal Gerunds As Mixed Categories In Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar , 1999 .

[52]  John A. Hawkins,et al.  Modifier-head or function-argument relations in phrase structure?: The evidence of some word order universals , 1984 .

[53]  R. Quirk A Grammar of contemporary English , 1974 .

[54]  Steven Abney,et al.  Parsing By Chunks , 1991 .

[55]  L. Talmy Toward a Cognitive Semantics , 2003 .

[56]  Richard Hudson Are determiners heads , 2004 .

[57]  George Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things , 1987 .

[58]  Mark Steedman,et al.  The syntactic process , 2004, Language, speech, and communication.