Integrating Life Cycle Assessment with Green Building and Product Rating Systems: North American Perspective

The development of green building rating systems (GBRS) and sustainability metrics for buildings, including building products, is reviewed from a North American perspective. The Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) system and the Living Building Challenge (LBC) are highlighted as primary examples of different levels of GBRS. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is introduced as a preferred method of quantifying sustainability, and its integration into current GBRS is examined a prominent building example. Two example applications of LCA to building products associated with GBRS – carpet and roof membranes – are provided. In the first example, conventional carpet was compared with carpet meeting the standards of the LBC's materials exclusion criteria (Red List, via the Declare product labeling system). In the second example, LCA was applied to both the manufacture and use phases of roof membrane alternatives for a building retrofit project, one of which would have aided in achieving LEED certification. The Declare-listed products did not perform better in every LCA impact category, and the GBRS-preferred roof system performed more poorly in all LCA impact categories, while suggesting the need for additional LCA categories. Both examples help to illustrate the complexity and tradeoffs encountered while integrating the quantitative perspective of LCA and the qualitative perspective of GBRS.

[1]  Thomas A Glass,et al.  The built environment and obesity: a systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence. , 2010, Health & place.

[2]  Rolf U Halden,et al.  Plastics and environmental health: the road ahead , 2013, Reviews on environmental health.

[3]  Oscar Ortiz,et al.  Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA , 2009 .

[4]  Oswer,et al.  Characterization of Building-Related Construction and Demolition Debris in the United States , 2016 .

[5]  W. Fisk,et al.  Summary of human responses to ventilation. , 2004, Indoor air.

[6]  Jane C. Bare,et al.  TRACI 2.0: the tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts 2.0 , 2011 .

[7]  Emergency Response,et al.  Characterization of building-related construction and demolition debris in the United States , 1998 .

[8]  Ruffina Thilakaratne,et al.  Is LEED Leading Asia?: an Analysis of Global Adaptation and Trends , 2011 .

[9]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Integrating Human Indoor Air Pollutant Exposure within Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Amanjeet Singh,et al.  Effects of green buildings on employee health and productivity. , 2010, American journal of public health.

[11]  Anne Grete Hestnes,et al.  Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article , 2007 .

[12]  Alex K. Jones,et al.  Indoor environmental quality in a dynamic life cycle assessment framework for whole buildings: Focus on human health chemical impacts , 2013 .

[13]  Vivian Loftness,et al.  Elements That Contribute to Healthy Building Design , 2007, Environmental health perspectives.

[14]  J. Tester,et al.  The Built Environment: Designing Communities to Promote Physical Activity in Children , 2009, Pediatrics.

[15]  G. Norris,et al.  TRACI the tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts , 2002 .

[16]  Chelsea M. Rochman,et al.  Policy: Classify plastic waste as hazardous , 2013, Nature.

[17]  J. Samet,et al.  Ventilation rates and health: multidisciplinary review of the scientific literature. , 2011, Indoor air.

[18]  Wan Ki Chow,et al.  Sick building syndrome—A case study , 1991 .

[19]  R. Wiik,et al.  Indoor productivity measured by common response patterns to physical and psychosocial stimuli. , 2011, Indoor air.

[20]  P. Thirumalaikolundusubramanian,et al.  Tight or sick building syndrome , 1991 .

[21]  William J. Fisk,et al.  Some Quantitative Relations between Indoor Environmental Quality and Work Performance or Health , 2006 .

[22]  Oar,et al.  The Inside Story: A Guide to Indoor Air Quality , 2014 .

[23]  Jennifer Cooper,et al.  Life cycle impact assessment weights to support environmentally preferable purchasing in the United States. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  Sara Wilkinson,et al.  International Comparison of Sustainable Rating Tools , 2009 .

[25]  Nuri Mehmet Gokhan,et al.  The Economic Benefits of Green Buildings: A Comprehensive Case Study , 2006 .

[26]  Gian Andrea Blengini,et al.  Energy-saving policies and low-energy residential buildings: an LCA case study to support decision makers in Piedmont (Italy) , 2010 .

[27]  A. K. Jones,et al.  Integrating Indoor environmental quality metrics in a dynamic life cycle assessment framework for buildings , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology (ISSST).

[28]  Melissa M. Bilec,et al.  Impact of lifetime on US residential building LCA results , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[29]  R. Kosonena,et al.  The effect of perceived indoor air quality on productivity loss , 2004 .

[30]  Oswer,et al.  Waste Reduction Model (WARM) , 2016 .

[31]  James A. Fava,et al.  Will the Next 10 Years be as Productive in Advancing Life Cycle Approaches as the Last 15 Years? , 2006 .

[32]  Giovanni Andrea Blengini,et al.  The changing role of life cycle phases, subsystems and materials in the LCA of low energy buildings , 2010 .

[33]  Luis Pérez-Lombard,et al.  A review on buildings energy consumption information , 2008 .

[34]  P. Lioy,et al.  Current State of the Science: Health Effects and Indoor Environmental Quality , 2007, Environmental health perspectives.