Older people's use of powered wheelchairs for activity and participation.

OBJECTIVE The aims of this study were to investigate outcomes of older people's use of powered wheelchairs and risk factors for negative outcomes. DESIGN The study was a cross-sectional interview-study including 111 powered wheelchair users over 65 years of age. RESULTS All participants used their powered wheelchair in the summer; nearly all users regarded it as important and found that it gave them independence. The wheelchair made activity and participation possible for the users. The most frequent activity in the summer was going for a ride, and in the winter it was shopping. However, some could not use the wheelchair for visits, and supplementary travel modes are called for. Users who could not walk at all or who could not transfer without assistance were more likely not to be able to carry out prioritized activities. Furthermore, other risk factors for negative outcomes and need for further research were identified. CONCLUSION The use of powered wheelchairs is a relevant societal intervention in relation to older people with limited walking ability in order to make activity and participation possible. It is likely that a larger proportion of older people could benefit from this intervention, in particular if current practices are improved taking activity and participation outcomes into consideration.

[1]  J. Abramson,et al.  Survey Methods in Community Medicine , 1980 .

[2]  Agneta Ståhl.  Changing Mobility Patterns and the Aging Population in Sweden. , 1987 .

[3]  D. Patrick,et al.  Disablement in the Community , 1989 .

[4]  M N Ozer.  A participatory planning process for wheelchair selection. , 1990, Journal of rehabilitation research and development. Clinical supplement.

[5]  K. Schultz-Larsen,et al.  What do 70-ycar-old men and women actually do? And what are they able to do? From the Glostrup survey in 1984 , 1991, Aging.

[6]  A. G. Fisher,et al.  Age differences in functional performance. , 1993, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[7]  G Grimby,et al.  Assistive devices in an elderly population studied at 70 and 76 years of age. , 1994, Disability and rehabilitation.

[8]  Albert M. Cook,et al.  Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice , 1995 .

[9]  Carole Miles-Tapping,et al.  Lifestyle Implications of Power Mobility , 1995 .

[10]  Frequency measures of behavior for assistive technology and rehabilitation. , 1996, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[11]  B. Steen,et al.  The use and effectiveness of assistive devices in an elderly urban population , 1996, Aging.

[12]  R O Smith,et al.  Measuring the outcomes of assistive technology: challenge and innovation. , 1996, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[13]  L Spazzafumo,et al.  Outdoor mobility and social relationships of elderly people. , 1997, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[14]  Rosalind Gill,et al.  The Gender-Technology Relation , 2018 .

[15]  On Scaling Methodology and Environmental Influences in Disability Assessments: The Cumulative Structure of Personal and Instrumental ADL among Older Adults in a Swedish Rural District , 1997 .

[16]  M. Lilja,et al.  Elderly people's daily activities and need for mobility support. , 1997, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[17]  E. Brandt,et al.  Enabling America: Assessing the Role of Rehabilitation Science and Engineering , 1997 .

[18]  Linda McClain,et al.  Wheelchair Accessibility—Living the Experience: Function in the Community , 1998 .

[19]  Elizabeth Cooper,et al.  The provision of powered wheelchairs: one year on , 1998 .

[20]  Cees J. H. Midden,et al.  PREDICTORS OF THE ADAPTIVE PROBLEM-SOLVING OF OLDER PERSONS IN THEIR HOMES , 1998 .

[21]  L. Berkman,et al.  Population based study of social and productive activities as predictors of survival among elderly Americans , 1999, BMJ.

[22]  Debbie Field,et al.  Powered Mobility: A Literature Review Illustrating the Importance of a Multifaceted Approach , 1999 .

[23]  A. Rigby.  Statistical methods in epidemiology. III. The odds ratio as an approximation to the relative risk. , 1999, Disability and rehabilitation.

[24]  R. Evans,et al.  The Effect of Electrically Powered Indoor/Outdoor Wheelchairs on Occupation: A Study of Users' Views , 2000 .

[25]  M E Buning,et al.  Occupational performance and the transition to powered mobility: a pilot study. , 2001, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[26]  Self‐Image of Aging: A Method for Health Promotion , 2002 .

[27]  Agneta Ståhl,et al.  The Personal Component of Accessibility at Group Level: Exploring the Complexity of Functional Capacity , 2002 .

[28]  Susanne Iwarsson,et al.  Accessibility to the public environment as perceived by teenagers with functional limitations in a south Swedish town centre , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[29]  Luc P. de Witte,et al.  Satisfaction with and use of assistive devices and services for outdoor mobility , 2002 .

[30]  Denise Reid,et al.  Impact of Wheeled Seated Mobility Devices on Adult Users' and Their Caregivers' Occupational Performance: A Critical Literature Review , 2002, Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie.

[31]  Å. Brandt,et al.  Satisfaction with rollators among community-living users: a follow-up study , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.