A simple view of the brain through a frequency-specific functional connectivity measure

Here we develop a measure of functional connectivity describing the degree of covariability between a brain region and the rest of the brain. This measure is based on previous formulas for the mutual information (MI) between clusters of regions in the frequency domain. Under the current scenario, the MI can be given as a simple monotonous function of the multiple coherence and it leads to an easy visual representation of connectivity patterns. Computationally efficient formulas, adequate for short time series, are presented and applied to functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data measured in subjects (N=34) performing a working memory task or being at rest. While resting state coherence in high (0.17-0.25 Hz) and middle (0.08-0.17 Hz) frequency intervals is bilaterally salient in several limbic and temporal areas including the insula, the amygdala, and the primary auditory cortex, low frequencies (<0.08 Hz) have greatest connectivity in frontal structures. Results from the comparison between resting and N-back conditions show enhanced low frequency coherence in many of the areas previously reported in standard fMRI activation studies of working memory, but task related reductions in high frequency connectivity are also found in regions of the default mode network. Finally, potentially confounding effects of head movement and regional volume on MI are identified and addressed.

[1]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Prolonged Reaction Time to a Verbal Working Memory Task Predicts Increased Power of Posterior Parietal Cortical Activation , 2000, NeuroImage.

[2]  Tulay Adali,et al.  A method for comparing group fMRI data using independent component analysis: application to visual, motor and visuomotor tasks. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[3]  G L Shulman,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:A default mode of brain function , 2001 .

[4]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[5]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Neural mechanisms of prefrontal cortical function: implications for cognitive rehabilitation. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[7]  A. Damasio The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness , 1999 .

[8]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Probabilistic independent component analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Modelling functional integration: a comparison of structural equation and dynamic causal models , 2004, NeuroImage.

[10]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Neurophysiological architecture of functional magnetic resonance images of human brain. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  Joseph E. LeDoux,et al.  Long-term potentiation in the amygdala: A cellular mechanism of fear learning and memory , 2007, Neuropharmacology.

[12]  D. Chialvo,et al.  Chronic Pain and the Emotional Brain: Specific Brain Activity Associated with Spontaneous Fluctuations of Intensity of Chronic Back Pain , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Functional Magnetic Resonance Image Analysis of a Large-Scale Neurocognitive Network , 1996, NeuroImage.

[14]  Jieun Kim,et al.  Effects of Verbal Working Memory Load on Corticocortical Connectivity Modeled by Path Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data , 2002, NeuroImage.

[15]  W. Singer,et al.  Functional imaging of mirror and inverse reading reveals separate coactivated networks for oculomotion and spatial transformations , 1998, Neuroreport.

[16]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[17]  R. Adolphs Neural systems for recognizing emotion , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[18]  S. Thompson-Schill,et al.  The frontal lobes and the regulation of mental activity , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[19]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Independent component analysis of fMRI group studies by self-organizing clustering , 2005, NeuroImage.

[20]  M. E. Walton,et al.  Cognitive Neuroscience: Resolving Conflict in and over the Medial Frontal Cortex , 2005, Current Biology.

[21]  R. Schlösser,et al.  Assessing the working memory network: Studies with functional magnetic resonance imaging and structural equation modeling , 2006, Neuroscience.

[22]  Wei Zhu,et al.  Unified structural equation modeling approach for the analysis of multisubject, multivariate functional MRI data , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[23]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Undirected graphs of frequency-dependent functional connectivity in whole brain networks , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  Vinod Menon,et al.  Functional connectivity in the resting brain: A network analysis of the default mode hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Maurice Kendall,et al.  Time Series , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[26]  M. Mesulam Principles of Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology , 2000 .

[27]  M. Raichle,et al.  Searching for a baseline: Functional imaging and the resting human brain , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[28]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Functional disconnectivity of the medial temporal lobe in Asperger’s syndrome , 2005, Biological Psychiatry.

[29]  Kathryn M. McMillan,et al.  N‐back working memory paradigm: A meta‐analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[30]  D. Stuss,et al.  The Frontal Lobes , 1986 .

[31]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Revealing interactions among brain systems with nonlinear PCA , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[32]  D. Brillinger Time series - data analysis and theory , 1981, Classics in applied mathematics.

[33]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[34]  V. Haughton,et al.  Frequencies contributing to functional connectivity in the cerebral cortex in "resting-state" data. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[35]  D. P. Russell,et al.  Functional Clustering: Identifying Strongly Interactive Brain Regions in Neuroimaging Data , 1998, NeuroImage.

[36]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  Contributions of the Amygdala to Emotion Processing: From Animal Models to Human Behavior , 2005, Neuron.

[37]  E. Bullmore,et al.  How Good Is Good Enough in Path Analysis of fMRI Data? , 2000, NeuroImage.

[38]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Frequency based mutual information measures between clusters of brain regions in functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, NeuroImage.