Synthesis in land change science: methodological patterns, challenges, and guidelines

Global and regional economic and environmental changes are increasingly influencing local land-use, livelihoods, and ecosystems. At the same time, cumulative local land changes are driving global and regional changes in biodiversity and the environment. To understand the causes and consequences of these changes, land change science (LCS) draws on a wide array synthetic and meta-study techniques to generate global and regional knowledge from local case studies of land change. Here, we review the characteristics and applications of synthesis methods in LCS and assess the current state of synthetic research based on a meta-analysis of synthesis studies from 1995 to 2012. Publication of synthesis research is accelerating, with a clear trend toward increasingly sophisticated and quantitative methods, including meta-analysis. Detailed trends in synthesis objectives, methods, and land change phenomena and world regions most commonly studied are presented. Significant challenges to successful synthesis research in LCS are also identified, including issues of interpretability and comparability across case-studies and the limits of and biases in the geographic coverage of case studies. Nevertheless, synthesis methods based on local case studies will remain essential for generating systematic global and regional understanding of local land change for the foreseeable future, and multiple opportunities exist to accelerate and enhance the reliability of synthetic LCS research in the future. Demand for global and regional knowledge generation will continue to grow to support adaptation and mitigation policies consistent with both the local realities and regional and global environmental and economic contexts of land change.

[1]  Ronald R Rindfuss,et al.  Developing a science of land change: challenges and methodological issues. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  N. Vliet,et al.  Is There a Continuing Rationale for Swidden Cultivation in the 21st Century? , 2013 .

[3]  L. P. Koh,et al.  A Meta‐Analysis of the Impact of Anthropogenic Forest Disturbance on Southeast Asia's Biotas , 2009 .

[4]  E. Ostrom.  A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Kjeld Rasmussen,et al.  Desertification in reverse? Observations from northern Burkina Faso , 2001 .

[6]  G. Fischer,et al.  Land-use and land-cover change. Science/research plan , 1995 .

[7]  Scott Rozelle,et al.  The nature and causes of the global water crisis: Syndromes from a meta‐analysis of coupled human‐water studies , 2012 .

[8]  A. Newton,et al.  Enhancement of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services by Ecological Restoration: A Meta-Analysis , 2009, Science.

[9]  J. Ardö,et al.  A recent greening of the Sahel—trends, patterns and potential causes , 2005 .

[10]  B. Turner,et al.  Does the Sahelian smallholder's management of woodland, farm trees, rangeland support the hypothesis of human-induced desertification? , 2005 .

[11]  B. Turner,et al.  Land change science special feature: The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2007) 104, 52, (20666-20671) DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0704119104) , 2008 .

[12]  G. Arnqvist,et al.  Meta-analysis: synthesizing research findings in ecology and evolution. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[13]  Grzegorz M. Wilczynski,et al.  Experience-Dependent Plasticity and Modulation of Growth Regulatory Molecules at Central Synapses , 2011, PloS one.

[14]  Ashton M. Shortridge,et al.  Exploring Complexity in a Human–Environment System: An Agent-Based Spatial Model for Multidisciplinary and Multiscale Integration , 2005 .

[15]  Arnold K. Bregt,et al.  An agent-based approach to model land-use change at a regional scale , 2010, Landscape Ecology.

[16]  Antonio Di Gregorio,et al.  Parametric land cover and land-use classifications as tools for environmental change detection , 2002 .

[17]  P. Verburg,et al.  Linking Land Change with Driving Forces and Actors: Four Conceptual Models , 2010 .

[18]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. , 1990 .

[19]  Stephen J. Walsh,et al.  Frontier Land Use Change: Synthesis, Challenges, and Next Steps , 2007 .

[20]  P. Verburg,et al.  From land cover change to land function dynamics: a major challenge to improve land characterization. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[21]  Anthony C. Janetos,et al.  Land system architecture: Using land systems to adapt and mitigate global environmental change , 2013 .

[22]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  STATISTICAL ISSUES IN ECOLOGICAL META‐ANALYSES , 1999 .

[23]  Walter Jetz,et al.  Integrating biodiversity distribution knowledge: toward a global map of life. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  Gu Lb,et al.  Soil carbon stocks and land use change : a meta analysis , 2022 .

[25]  Wolfram Dressler,et al.  Swidden Transformations and Rural Livelihoods in Southeast Asia , 2009 .

[26]  J. W. Bruce,et al.  The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths , 2001 .

[27]  E. Messer.  The Comparative Analysis of Human Societies: Toward Common Standards for Data Collection and Reporting , 1996 .

[28]  James Regetz,et al.  Advances in global change research require open science by individual researchers , 2012 .

[29]  Wayne G. Lutters,et al.  Discovering Ecologically Relevant Knowledge from Published Studies through Geosemantic Searching , 2013 .

[30]  Robert Q. Hanham,et al.  Population pressure and agricultural intensity , 1977 .

[31]  P. Winters,et al.  Assets, Activities and Rural Income Generation: Evidence from a Multicountry Analysis , 2009 .

[32]  A. Moody,et al.  Deciding Where to Burn: Stakeholder Priorities for Prescribed Burning of a Fire-Dependent Ecosystem , 2011 .

[33]  N. Hawkins,et al.  Data sharing in genomics — re-shaping scientific practice , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[34]  Deborah A. Agarwal,et al.  A data‐centered collaboration portal to support global carbon‐flux analysis , 2009, Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp..

[35]  S. Nicholson,et al.  A comparison of the vegetation response to rainfall in the Sahel and East Africa, using normalized difference vegetation index from NOAA AVHRR , 1990 .

[36]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine [serial online].

[37]  Paul Schot,et al.  Land use change modelling: current practice and research priorities , 2004 .

[38]  A. Vayda,et al.  Progressive contextualization: Methods for research in human ecology , 1983 .

[39]  Max L. Wilson,et al.  RepliCHI: the workshop , 2013, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[40]  A. Ziegler,et al.  Trends, drivers and impacts of changes in swidden cultivation in tropical forest-agriculture frontiers: A global assessment , 2012 .

[41]  Yiqi Luo,et al.  Global patterns of the dynamics of soil carbon and nitrogen stocks following afforestation: a meta-analysis. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[42]  Erle C. Ellis.  The GLOBE Project: accelerating global synthesis of local studies in land change science , 2012 .

[43]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  Mapping where ecologists work: biases in the global distribution of terrestrial ecological observations , 2012, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.

[44]  R. DeFries,et al.  Framing Sustainability in a Telecoupled World , 2013, Ecology and Society.

[45]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Fourteen Years of Monitoring Community-Managed Forests: Learning from IFRI's Experience , 2007 .

[46]  Thomas Rudel,et al.  Meta-analyses of case studies: A method for studying regional and global environmental change , 2008 .

[47]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  Methodological issues and advances in biological meta-analysis , 2012, Evolutionary Ecology.

[48]  William J. McConnell,et al.  Global change and the intensification of agriculture in the tropics , 2005 .

[49]  M. S. Patel,et al.  An introduction to meta-analysis. , 1989, Health Policy.

[50]  A. Ziegler,et al.  Carbon outcomes of major land‐cover transitions in SE Asia: great uncertainties and REDD+ policy implications , 2012, Global change biology.

[51]  Eric F. Lambin,et al.  Forest transitions: towards a global understanding of land use change , 2005 .

[52]  S. Tang.  Institutions and Collective Action: Self-Governance in Irrigation , 1992 .

[53]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems , 2013, CHI 2013.

[54]  Steven M. Manson,et al.  Case studies, cross-site comparisons, and the challenge of generalization: comparing agent-based models of land-use change in frontier regions , 2008, Journal of land use science.

[55]  W. Parton,et al.  Land use change: complexity and comparisons , 2008, Journal of land use science.

[56]  Eric F. Lambin,et al.  Global Forest Transition: Prospects for an End to Deforestation , 2011 .

[57]  K. Seto,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Global Urban Land Expansion , 2011, PloS one.

[58]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Planetary Opportunities: A Social Contract for Global Change Science to Contribute to a Sustainable Future , 2012 .

[59]  A. Angelsen,et al.  Rethinking the causes of deforestation: lessons from economic models. , 1999, The World Bank research observer.

[60]  Peter H. Verburg,et al.  Analysis of land use drivers at the watershed and household level: Linking two paradigms at the Philippine forest fringe , 2005, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[61]  E. Lambin,et al.  The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  Thomas Rudel,et al.  Changing agents of deforestation: From state-initiated to enterprise driven processes, 1970–2000 , 2007 .

[63]  Rosa Maria Roman Cuesta,et al.  Human interactions with the Earth system: people and pixels revisited , 2008 .

[64]  A. Schrijver,et al.  Cumulative nitrogen input drives species loss in terrestrial ecosystems , 2011 .

[65]  Wouter Achten,et al.  Implications of biodiesel-induced land-use changes for CO2 emissions: Case studies in Tropical America, Africa, and Southeast Asia , 2011 .

[66]  Kenneth M. Johnson,et al.  Rural land-use trends in the conterminous United States, 1950-2000 , 2005 .

[67]  E. Lambin,et al.  Dynamic Causal Patterns of Desertification , 2004 .