Precise natal homing and an estimate of age at sexual maturity in hawksbill turtles

The geographic specificity of natal philopatry (how precisely breeding individuals return to their natal origins) influences breeding biology, genetic diversity and habitat range, and therefore has important implications for species resiliency and management. Also, the age at which individuals reach sexual maturity and enter the breeding population is a vital parameter for demographic analyses. Empirical research on philopatry and maturation, however, is challenging for long‐lived animals that are difficult to observe, such as marine turtles that have complex oceanic life histories. Regional natal philopatry is well established for marine turtles, but the geographic specificity of philopatry is unclear. Similarly, estimates of age at maturity vary widely, and direct evidence is lacking. Here, we targeted these information gaps by assessing kinship among 256 females from Antigua’s Jumby Bay (JB) hawksbill turtle rookery, a population with demonstrated nest‐site fidelity and neophyte assimilation. We estimated mother–daughter and full sibling relationships with a maximum‐likelihood full‐pedigree reconstruction approach, incorporating genotypic (12 microsatellites), maternal genealogy (mitochondrial DNA) and age structure (long‐term mark–recapture) data. We validated relationships with parentage assignment and pairwise relatedness estimators. Fourteen veteran nesters were the mothers of 42 younger nesters, and 94 nesters formed 35 full sibships. Time between the first nesting records of mothers and their daughters indicated maximum time to maturity as short as 14 years in Caribbean hawksbills. Thirteen of the 14 mothers showed consistently high fidelity to JB for two decades, providing compelling evidence that 41 of these daughters originated from JB nests and returned to this 1‐km‐long natal site to breed. Rookeries with strongly philopatric individuals might have limited colonization potential and be at a disadvantage in the event of habitat loss. This study demonstrates the utility of long‐term mark–recapture data in kinship analyses for answering questions relevant to endangered species conservation.

[1]  R. E. Page,et al.  Reproductive Competition , 2020, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[2]  K. Levasseur,et al.  Exceptionally high natal homing precision in hawksbill sea turtles to insular rookeries of the Caribbean , 2019, Marine Ecology Progress Series.

[3]  E. Anderson,et al.  Dispersal of a nearshore marine fish connects marine reserves and adjacent fished areas along an open coast , 2019, Molecular ecology.

[4]  B. Godley,et al.  How many came home? Evaluating ex situ conservation of green turtles in the Cayman Islands , 2019, Molecular ecology.

[5]  W. Kendall,et al.  A multistate open robust design: population dynamics, reproductive effort, and phenology of sea turtles from tagging data , 2018, Ecological Monographs.

[6]  H. Mouritsen.  Long-distance navigation and magnetoreception in migratory animals , 2018, Nature.

[7]  K. Lohmann,et al.  Evidence that Magnetic Navigation and Geomagnetic Imprinting Shape Spatial Genetic Variation in Sea Turtles , 2018, Current Biology.

[8]  L. Cardona,et al.  Sporadic nesting reveals long distance colonisation in the philopatric loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[9]  Jeffrey C. Mangel,et al.  Natal foraging philopatry in eastern Pacific hawksbill turtles , 2017, Royal Society Open Science.

[10]  Kelly R. Stewart,et al.  Advances in the Application of Genetics in Marine Turtle Biology and Conservation , 2017, Front. Mar. Sci..

[11]  Phil J. Bradshaw.  Investigating variation in the life-history strategy of marine turtles , 2017 .

[12]  G. Jones,et al.  First genealogy for a wild marine fish population reveals multigenerational philopatry , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  L. Vigilant,et al.  Strategies for determining kinship in wild populations using genetic data , 2016, Ecology and evolution.

[14]  B. Willis,et al.  Sperm dispersal distances estimated by parentage analysis in a brooding scleractinian coral , 2016, Molecular ecology.

[15]  Nathan F. Putman,et al.  Multi-Modal Homing in Sea Turtles: Modeling Dual Use of Geomagnetic and Chemical Cues in Island-Finding , 2016, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[16]  Kyle S. Van Houtan,et al.  Time in tortoiseshell: a bomb radiocarbon-validated chronology in sea turtle scutes , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  H. Taylor.  The use and abuse of genetic marker-based estimates of relatedness and inbreeding , 2015, Ecology and evolution.

[18]  Brian Hamilton,et al.  International Geomagnetic Reference Field: the 12th generation , 2015, Earth, Planets and Space.

[19]  Colin J. Stoneking,et al.  Reproductive competition and inbreeding avoidance in a primate species with habitual female dispersal , 2015, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[20]  Kenneth J. Lohmann,et al.  Evidence for Geomagnetic Imprinting and Magnetic Navigation in the Natal Homing of Sea Turtles , 2015, Current Biology.

[21]  William L. Allen,et al.  Sexually selected skin colour is heritable and related to fecundity in a non-human primate , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  C. Eizaguirre,et al.  Evolutionary conservation—evaluating the adaptive potential of species , 2014, Evolutionary Applications.

[23]  K. Bjorndal,et al.  Variation in age and size at sexual maturity in Kemp’s ridley sea turtles , 2014 .

[24]  W. Porter,et al.  First satellite tracks of neonate sea turtles redefine the ‘lost years’ oceanic niche , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  M. Witt,et al.  High rates of growth recorded for hawksbill sea turtles in Anegada, British Virgin Islands , 2014, Ecology and evolution.

[26]  E. K. Pikitch,et al.  Two decades of genetic profiling yields first evidence of natal philopatry and long‐term fidelity to parturition sites in sharks , 2014, Molecular ecology.

[27]  D. Richardson,et al.  Potential inter-season sperm storage by a female hawksbill turtle , 2014 .

[28]  D. Weller,et al.  Strong maternal fidelity and natal philopatry shape genetic structure in North Pacific humpback whales , 2013 .

[29]  M. Snover,et al.  Age and Age Estimation in Sea Turtles , 2013 .

[30]  G. Jones,et al.  Relative accuracy of three common methods of parentage analysis in natural populations , 2013, Molecular ecology.

[31]  K. Lohmann,et al.  Natal homing and imprinting in sea turtles , 2013 .

[32]  K. Nagasawa,et al.  Estimation of sperm storage duration in captive loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) , 2013 .

[33]  C. Nairn,et al.  Tetranucleotide microsatellite loci from the critically endangered hawksbill turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata) , 2013, Conservation Genetics Resources.

[34]  C. V. van Schaik,et al.  Parentage‐based pedigree reconstruction reveals female matrilineal clusters and male‐biased dispersal in nongregarious Asian great apes, the Bornean orang‐utans (Pongo pygmaeus) , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[35]  C. Giacoma,et al.  Different growth rates between loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) of Mediterranean and Atlantic origin in the Mediterranean Sea , 2011 .

[36]  Jinliang Wang.  coancestry: a program for simulating, estimating and analysing relatedness and inbreeding coefficients , 2011, Molecular ecology resources.

[37]  J. Ragle,et al.  IUCN Red List of Threatened Species , 2010 .

[38]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Individuals and populations: the role of long-term, individual-based studies of animals in ecology and evolutionary biology. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[39]  A. Cazenave,et al.  Sea-Level Rise and Its Impact on Coastal Zones , 2010, Science.

[40]  F. Abreu-Grobois,et al.  Population subdivision in hawksbill turtles nesting on Barbados, West Indies, determined from mitochondrial DNA control region sequences , 2010, Conservation Genetics.

[41]  S. Kamel,et al.  Nesting Ecology of the Hawksbill Turtle, Eretmochelys imbricata, in Guadeloupe, French West Indies from 2000–07 , 2009 .

[42]  Matthew H. Godfrey,et al.  Climate change and marine turtles , 2009 .

[43]  J. Wang,et al.  Parentage and Sibship Inference From Multilocus Genotype Data Under Polygamy , 2009, Genetics.

[44]  J. Pemberton,et al.  Wild pedigrees: the way forward , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  W. S. Brown,et al.  Integrating individual behaviour and landscape genetics: the population structure of timber rattlesnake hibernacula , 2007, Molecular ecology.

[46]  S A Karl,et al.  Population genetics and phylogeography of sea turtles , 2007, Molecular ecology.

[47]  A. Hastings,et al.  Thresholds and the resilience of Caribbean coral reefs , 2007, Nature.

[48]  P. Jonsson,et al.  Migratory behaviour of Atlantic cod Gadus morhua: natal homing is the prime stock-separating mechanism , 2007 .

[49]  D. Schoeman,et al.  Sandy beaches at the brink , 2007 .

[50]  J. Horrocks,et al.  Increase in hawksbill sea turtle Eretmochelys imbricata nesting in Barbados, West Indies , 2007 .

[51]  Jinliang Wang,et al.  Triadic IBD coefficients and applications to estimating pairwise relatedness. , 2007, Genetical research.

[52]  S. Kalinowski,et al.  Revising how the computer program cervus accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment , 2007, Molecular ecology.

[53]  G. Hays,et al.  Detecting female precise natal philopatry in green turtles using assignment methods , 2006, Molecular ecology.

[54]  R. Frankham.  Effective population size/adult population size ratios in wildlife: a review. , 1995, Genetical research.

[55]  K. Eckert,et al.  An Atlas of Sea Turtle Nesting Habitat for the Wider Caribbean Region , 2007 .

[56]  R. Hueter,et al.  Evidence of Philopatry in Sharks and Implications for the Management of Shark Fisheries , 2007 .

[57]  N. Mrosovsky,et al.  Inter-seasonal maintenance of individual nest site preferences in hawksbill sea turtles. , 2006, Ecology.

[58]  Hanna Kokko,et al.  From Individual Dispersal to Species Ranges: Perspectives for a Changing World , 2006, Science.

[59]  D. B. Hall,et al.  Eighteen years of saturation tagging data reveal a significant increase in nesting hawksbill sea turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata) on Long Island, Antigua , 2006 .

[60]  J. Martin Marcos,et al.  Experimentally increased food resources in the natal territory promote offspring philopatry and helping in cooperatively breeding carrion crows , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[61]  Aaron P. Wagner,et al.  ml‐relate: a computer program for maximum likelihood estimation of relatedness and relationship , 2006 .

[62]  Peter H. Dutton,et al.  Increase of a Caribbean leatherback turtle Dermochelys coriacea nesting population linked to long-term nest protection , 2005 .

[63]  P M Kappeler,et al.  Microsatellite analyses reveal fine‐scale genetic structure in grey mouse lemurs (Microcebus murinus) , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[64]  R. Hueter,et al.  The implications of philopatry in sharks for the management of shark fisheries , 2004 .

[65]  C. Oosterhout,et al.  Micro-Checker: Software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data , 2004 .

[66]  Michael S. Blouin,et al.  DNA-based methods for pedigree reconstruction and kinship analysis in natural populations , 2003 .

[67]  L. Crowder,et al.  Population Models for Atlantic Loggerheads: Past, Present, and Future , 2003 .

[68]  K. Bjorndal,et al.  Selective feeding in the hawksbill turtle, an important predator in coral reef ecosystems , 2002 .

[69]  K. Bjorndal,et al.  Roles of Sea Turtles in Marine Ecosystems: Reconstructing the Past , 2002 .

[70]  A. Bolten.  Variation in Sea Turtle Life History Patterns: Neritic vs. Oceanic Developmental Stages , 2002 .

[71]  I. Owens,et al.  Extra pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[72]  R. V. Dam,et al.  Habitat effect on hawksbill turtle growth rates on feeding grounds at Mona and Monito Islands, Puerto Rico , 2002 .

[73]  D. O. Logofet.  Matrix Population Models: Construction, Analysis, and Interpretation , 2002 .

[74]  D. Secor.  Historical roots of the migration triangle , 2002 .

[75]  L. Crowder,et al.  LIFE HISTORIES AND ELASTICITY PATTERNS: PERTURBATION ANALYSIS FOR SPECIES WITH MINIMAL DEMOGRAPHIC DATA , 2000 .

[76]  R. Bell,et al.  Population Ecology and Demographic Implications Drawn From an 11-Year Study of Nesting Hawksbill Turtles, Eretmochelys imbricata, at Jumby Bay, Long Island, Antigua, West Indies , 1999 .

[77]  K. Eckert,et al.  Research and Management Techniques for the Conservation of Sea Turtles , 1999 .

[78]  B. Schierwater,et al.  Evolutionary handicap for turtles , 1996, Nature.

[79]  François Rousset,et al.  GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetic software for exact tests and ecumenicism , 1995 .

[80]  R. Boulon.  Growth Rates of Wild Juvenile Hawksbill Turtles, Eretmochelys imbricata, in St. Thomas, United States Virgin Islands , 1994 .

[81]  A. Meylan.  Spongivory in Hawksbill Turtles: A Diet of Glass , 1988, Science.

[82]  Stephen T. Emlen,et al.  The Evolution of Helping. I. An Ecological Constraints Model , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[83]  P. Greenwood.  Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals , 1980, Animal Behaviour.

[84]  A. Carr,et al.  Site Fixity in the Caribbean Green Turtle , 1972 .

[85]  J. Thoday.  Population Genetics , 1956, Nature.