Effects of yeast and maltose concentration on ultrasonic velocity and attenuation coefficient and its application for process monitoring

Monitoring substrate and cell concentration is important for controlling yeast propagation and fermentation processes. This usually requires two instruments, a density meter, and an optical turbidity meter. This paper presents a method for simultaneously determining yeast and maltose concentration with a single ultrasonic sensor. Ultrasonic velocity and attenuation were measured at varying maltose and yeast cell concentrations from 0 to 4 wt%. Ultrasonic velocity increased linearly with both yeast (R2 = 0.999) and maltose concentration (R2 = 0.996). In contrast, while attenuation coefficient depended linearly on yeast concentration (R2 = 0.998), it did not significantly depend on maltose concentration (R2 = 0.476). To draw conclusions about the main mechanisms of attenuation, the measured attenuation coefficients for yeast cells at 2 MHz were compared to predicted values. With a mean absolute percentage error of 0.25%, intrinsic absorption, thermal effects, and, to a lesser extent, viscous effects were identified as the main reason for damping. These results support the feasibility of combining ultrasonic velocity and attenuation measurements for estimating yeast cell and maltose concentration.

[1]  Yoshio Ishimori,et al.  Determination of Microbial Populations with Piezoelectric Membranes , 1981, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[2]  Thomas Becker,et al.  Sensor array for the combined analysis of water–sugar–ethanol mixtures in yeast fermentations by ultrasound , 2010 .

[3]  L. Riedel Wärmeleitfähigkeitsmessungen an Zuckerlösungen, Fruchtsäften und Milch , 1949 .

[4]  R. B. Lindsay On Understanding Physics , 1939 .

[5]  Thomas Becker,et al.  Time‐of‐flight prediction for fermentation process monitoring , 2011 .

[6]  I. Karube,et al.  Determination of microbial concentration with a piezoelectric gum sensor , 1989 .

[7]  V. A. D. Grosso,et al.  Speed of Sound in Pure Water , 1972 .

[8]  R. J. Urick,et al.  A Sound Velocity Method for Determining the Compressibility of Finely Divided Substances , 1947 .

[9]  David Julian McClements,et al.  Principles of Ultrasonic Droplet Size Determination in Emulsions , 1996 .

[10]  Malcolm J. W. Povey,et al.  Ultrasonic Techniques for Fluids Characterization , 1997 .

[11]  B. Lewin,et al.  Lewin's CELLS , 2010 .

[12]  M. K. Lim,et al.  Measurement of attenuation using a normalized amplitude spectrum , 1995 .

[13]  Ching-Hua Ting,et al.  Evaluation of ultrasonic propagation to measure sugar content and viscosity of reconstituted orange juice , 2008 .

[14]  U. Faust,et al.  Determination of Biomass by Ultrasonic Measurements , 1989, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[15]  J. Allegra,et al.  Attenuation of Sound in Suspensions and Emulsions: Theory and Experiments , 1972 .

[16]  A. H. Harker,et al.  Velocity and attenuation of ultrasound in suspensions of particles in fluids , 1988 .

[17]  G Locher,et al.  On-line measurement in biotechnology: techniques. , 1992, Journal of biotechnology.

[18]  Barbara Pfeffer,et al.  Fundamentals And Applications Of Ultrasonic Waves , 2016 .

[19]  P. J. Goetz,et al.  Ultrasonic characterization of proteins and blood cells. , 2006, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[20]  A KoellenspergerP,et al.  王水による化学ウェットエッチングによる白金(Pt)薄膜のパターン形成 , 2012 .

[21]  P. J. Goetz,et al.  Use of ultrasound for characterizing dairy products. , 2005, Journal of dairy science.

[22]  Gregory D. Buckner,et al.  Design and demonstration of a novel micro-Coulter counter utilizing liquid metal electrodes , 2012 .