Improving Mail Survey Responses from UK Academics: some empirical findings

ABSTRACT Despite numerous studies on how to elicit maximum mail survey response, the paper argues that very few are useful when surveying the views of UK academics. The paper reviews the organisational response literature, identifies salient response inducers and reports results of a survey to assess the attitudes of UK academics across a wide range of disciplines toward these response inducers (N = 497). The best inducer was to use a covering letter of explanation with the questionnaire, whilst the most negative item was the questionnaire being over four pages long. Differences in response rate, speed and quality between academics are also documented. Survey response rates varied widely across departments from 30–63%, with a noticeable gradient from the social to the physical sciences. Implications for mail survey design are discussed.

[1]  J. E. Swan,et al.  Can Follow-up Response Rates to a Mail Survey Be Increased by Including Another Copy of the Questionnaire? , 1980 .

[2]  Donald Tomaskovic-Devey,et al.  Organizational Survey Nonresponse , 1994 .

[3]  David Jobber,et al.  Improving response rates in industrial mail surveys , 1986 .

[4]  C. Dommeyer,et al.  Increasing response to industrial mail surveys , 1990 .

[5]  O. C. Ferrell,et al.  A Reassessment of the Effects of Appeals on Response to Mail Surveys , 1980 .

[6]  Roger A. Kerin,et al.  Methodological considerations in corporate mail surveys: A research note , 1976 .

[7]  J. Armstrong,et al.  Effectiveness of Monetary Incentives: Mail Surveys to Members of Multinational Professional Groups , 1994 .

[8]  T. Vocino,et al.  Three Variables in Stimulating Responses to Mailed Questionnaires , 1977 .

[9]  Linda Kuhn,et al.  The effect of visual stimuli on mail survey response rates , 1995 .

[10]  Gerald Linda,et al.  Multiple Criteria Effects in a Mail Survey Experiment , 1978 .

[11]  John Saunders,et al.  A note on the applicability of the Bruvold-Comer model of mail survey response rates to commercial populations , 1993 .

[12]  David Jobber,et al.  The effect of two variables on industrial mail survey returns , 1985 .

[13]  T. R. Gillpatrick,et al.  The effect of a nominal monetary gift and different contacting approaches on mail survey response among engineers , 1994 .

[14]  Pradeep K. Tyagi.  The effects of appeals, anonymity, and feedback on mail survey response patterns from salespeople , 1989 .

[15]  D. Jobber,et al.  A factorial investigation of methods of stimulating response to a mail survey , 1988 .

[16]  Sudhir K. Chawla,et al.  Does the name of the sender affect industrial mail response , 1994 .

[17]  John Saunders,et al.  An Experimental Investigation into Cross-National Mail Survey Response Rates , 1988 .

[18]  Ward S. Mason,et al.  LIVING RESEARCHAN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF FACTORS AFFECTING RESPONSE TO A MAIL SURVEY OF BEGINNING TEACHERS , 1961 .

[19]  W. Jack Duncan,et al.  Costs and benefits of selected response inducement techniques in mail survey research , 1989 .

[20]  Stavros P. Kalafatis,et al.  Impact of the inclusion of an article as an incentive in industrial mail surveys , 1994 .

[21]  Andrew E. Kimball.  Increasing the Rate of Return in Mail Surveys , 1961 .

[22]  John F. Veiga,et al.  Getting the mail questionnaire returned: Some practical research considerations. , 1974 .

[23]  Morton L. Brown.  USE OF A POSTCARD QUERY IN MAIL SURVEYS , 1965 .

[24]  Charles L. Martin,et al.  The Impact of Topic Interest on Mail Survey Response Behaviour , 1994 .

[25]  Donald E. Stem,et al.  Effects of signed versus unsigned internally administered questionnaires for managers , 1978 .

[26]  V. Mitchell,et al.  Effect of industrial prenotification on response rate, speed, quality, bias, and cost , 1994 .

[27]  D. H. Furse,et al.  Manipulating dissonance to improve mail survey response , 1984 .

[28]  D. Jobber,et al.  Incentives and Response Rates to Cross-National Business Surveys: A Logit Model Analysis , 1991 .

[29]  Stephen J. Carroll,et al.  Rate of Return for Closed versus Open-Ended Questions in a Mail Questionnaire Survey of Industrial Organizations , 1971 .

[30]  S. Dawson,et al.  Conducting International Mail Surveys: The Effect of Incentives on Response Rates with an Industry Population , 1988 .

[31]  W. Tullar,et al.  A Factor Interactive Investigation of Mail Survey Response Rates from a Commercial Population , 1977 .

[32]  Kenneth C. Schneider,et al.  Stimulating response to market surveys of business professionals , 1995 .

[33]  A. L. Ferriss.  A Note on Stimulating Response to Questionnaires , 1951 .

[34]  S. Chawla,et al.  Mail response rates from distributors , 1992 .

[35]  Charles W. Lamb,et al.  Effect on Mail Survey Return Rates of Including Questionnaires with Follow-up Letters , 1981 .

[36]  J. S. Mizes,et al.  Incentives for Increasing Return Rates: Magnitude Levels, Response Bias, amd Format , 1984 .

[37]  Joseph G. P. Paolillo,et al.  Monetary Incentives and Mail Questionnaire Response Rates , 1984 .

[38]  Paul Murphy,et al.  Miscellany: Exploring the Effects of Postcard Prenotification on Industrial Firms’ Response to Mail Surveys , 1991 .

[39]  W. Kephart,et al.  Increasing the Responses to Mail Questionnaires: A Research Study , 1958 .

[40]  J. Hornik,et al.  Foreign source effects on response behavior in cross-national mail surveys , 1986 .

[41]  Paul R. Murphy,et al.  Improving survey responses with postcards , 1990 .