Statistical estimation of resistance/conductance by electrical impedance tomography measurements

This paper is built upon the assumption that in electrical impedance tomography, vectors of voltages and currents are linearly dependent through a resistance matrix. This linear relationship was confirmed experimentally and may be derived analytically under certain assumptions regarding electrodes (Isaacson, 1991). Given measurement data consisting of voltages and currents, we treat this relationship as a linear statistical model. Thus, our goal is not to reconstruct the image but directly estimate its electromagnetic properties reflected in the resistance and/or conductance matrix using electrical impedance tomography (EIT) measurements of voltages and currents on the periphery of the body. Since no inverse problem is involved the algorithm for estimation merely reduces to one matrix inversion. We estimate the impedance resistance matrix using well established statistical inference techniques for linear regression models. We provide a comprehensive treatment for a two-dimensional homogeneous body of a circular shape, by which many concepts of electrical impedance tomography, such as width of electrodes, the difference between voltage-current and current-voltage systems are illustrated. Our theory may be applied to various tests including EIT hardware calibration and whether the medium is homogeneous. These tests are illustrated on phantom agar data.

[1]  William G. Cochran,et al.  Experimental designs, 2nd ed. , 1957 .

[2]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1966 .

[3]  S. R. Searle Linear Models , 1971 .

[4]  C. R. Rao,et al.  Generalized Inverse of Matrices and its Applications , 1972 .

[5]  K. S. Banerjee Generalized Inverse of Matrices and Its Applications , 1973 .

[6]  W. Hays Applied Regression Analysis. 2nd ed. , 1981 .

[7]  Bernard R. Rosner,et al.  Fundamentals of Biostatistics. , 1992 .

[8]  F. Graybill,et al.  Matrices with Applications in Statistics. , 1984 .

[9]  F. R. Gantmakher The Theory of Matrices , 1984 .

[10]  P. Lancaster,et al.  The theory of matrices : with applications , 1985 .

[11]  D. Isaacson Distinguishability of Conductivities by Electric Current Computed Tomography , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  J. Rice Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis , 1988 .

[13]  D. Isaacson,et al.  Electrode models for electric current computed tomography , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  David Isaacson,et al.  NOSER: An algorithm for solving the inverse conductivity problem , 1990, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[15]  David Isaacson,et al.  Exact solutions to a linearized inverse boundary value problem , 1990 .

[16]  A. Zinober Matrices: Methods and Applications , 1992 .

[17]  J. Newell,et al.  Rapid assessment of electrode characteristics for impedance imaging , 1990 .

[18]  David Isaacson,et al.  Effects of measurement precision and finite numbers of electrodes on linear impedance imaging algorithms , 1991 .

[19]  S. R. Judah,et al.  Reduced form of the Green's functions for disks and annular rings , 1991 .

[20]  J. Magnus,et al.  Matrix Differential Calculus with Applications in Statistics and Econometrics , 1991 .

[21]  M. Cheney,et al.  Distinguishability in impedance imaging , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  E. Somersalo,et al.  Existence and uniqueness for electrode models for electric current computed tomography , 1992 .

[23]  A. B. Rami Shani,et al.  Matrices: Methods and Applications , 1992 .

[24]  Kevin Paulson,et al.  Electrode modelling in electrical impedance tomography , 1992 .

[25]  A. Nachman,et al.  Global uniqueness for a two-dimensional inverse boundary value problem , 1996 .

[26]  M. K. Pidcock,et al.  Anomalous thresholds and edge singularities in electrical impedance tomography , 1996 .

[27]  Gunther Uhlmann,et al.  Uniqueness in the inverse conductivity problem for nonsmooth conductivities in two dimensions , 1997 .

[28]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis: Draper/Applied Regression Analysis , 1998 .

[29]  Helge Toutenburg,et al.  Linear models : least squares and alternatives , 1999 .

[30]  D. Isaacson,et al.  A reconstruction algorithm for electrical impedance tomography data collected on rectangular electrode arrays , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[31]  David Isaacson,et al.  Electrical Impedance Tomography , 1999, SIAM Rev..

[32]  N. J. Avis,et al.  Analytical solution to the three-dimensional electrical forward problem for a circular cylinder , 2000 .

[33]  Keith D. Paulsen,et al.  A multichannel continuously selectable multifrequency electrical impedance spectroscopy measurement system , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  E. Somersalo,et al.  Statistical inversion and Monte Carlo sampling methods in electrical impedance tomography , 2000 .

[35]  E. Curtis,et al.  Inverse Problems for Electrical Networks , 2000 .

[36]  Dale Borowiak,et al.  Linear Models, Least Squares and Alternatives , 2001, Technometrics.

[37]  Jari P. Kaipio,et al.  Modelling of internal structures and electrodes in electrical process tomography , 2001 .

[38]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Propagation of measurement noise through backprojection reconstruction in electrical impedance tomography , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[39]  P. Stark Inverse problems as statistics , 2002 .

[40]  Liliana Borcea,et al.  Electrical impedance tomography , 2002 .

[41]  David Isaacson,et al.  Special issue on electrical impedance imaging , 2002 .

[42]  David Isaacson,et al.  A direct reconstruction algorithm for electrical impedance tomography , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[43]  Yoram Bresler,et al.  Electromagnetic impedance tomography (EMIT): a new method for impedance imaging , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[44]  Marko Vauhkonen,et al.  Simultaneous reconstruction of electrode contact impedances and internal electrical properties: II. Laboratory experiments , 2002 .

[45]  Matti Lassas,et al.  Anisotropic conductivities that cannot be detected by EIT. , 2003, Physiological measurement.

[46]  Kim Knudsen,et al.  A new direct method for reconstructing isotropic conductivities in the plane. , 2003, Physiological measurement.

[47]  E. Demidenko,et al.  Mixed Models: Theory and Applications (Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics) , 2004 .

[48]  Keith D. Paulsen,et al.  On optimal current patterns for electrical impedance tomography , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.