The North American vehicle fleet has evolved in recent years to include an increasing percentage of pickups, sport utility vehicles (SUVs), and minivans. In 2002, sales of light trucks and vans accounted for almost half of all Canadian vehicle sales. The increased popularity of SUVs has been particularly striking, with a 143% increase in sales since 1993. Typically larger and heavier than automobiles, SUVs are built on frames that are more rigid and that ride higher, characteristics that not only provide increased physical protection to their occupants but also add to their overall appeal. SUVs, however, are involved in fatal rollover crashes at a much higher rate than cars. While this is undoubtedly due in part to their stiffer frames and higher centers of gravity, the manner in which SUVs are driven may also play a role. SUV drivers are often anecdotally reported to be overconfident, tending to overestimate their vehicle’s capabilities. Evidence suggests that because they sit higher, drivers of SUVs (and vans and pickups) are less able to judge speed accurately. A study was conducted to assess drivers’ chosen speed when they operated a simulated vehicle while viewing the road from a low eye height and a high eye height. Participants were instructed to drive, without reference to a speedometer, at a highway driving speed at which they felt comfortable and safe. As expected, drivers seated at a high eye height drove faster than when they were seated at a low eye height. The influence of driver eye height and lead vehicle size (large versus small) on the following distance from a slower-moving lead vehicle was also investigated. Regardless of eye height, the differences in following distances suggest that the size of the lead vehicle may affect how closely drivers choose to follow it.
[1]
Kara M. Kockelman,et al.
EFFECT OF VEHICLE TYPE ON THE CAPACITY OF SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: The Case of Light-Duty Trucks
,
2000
.
[2]
E. Scott Geller,et al.
Measuring road rage: development of the Propensity for Angry Driving Scale
,
2001
.
[3]
Stacy Cagle Davis,et al.
AN ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES IN THE UNITED STATES
,
2000
.
[4]
Kara M. Kockelman,et al.
EFFECT OF LIGHT-DUTY TRUCKS ON THE CAPACITY OF SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
,
2000
.
[5]
S. David Leonard.
Safety Practices with Children in Autos: Observations of Inadequate Behaviors
,
2001
.
[6]
Ronald W. Noel,et al.
Telepresence Effects on the Relationship of Velocity to the Psychological Experience of Speed
,
1999
.
[7]
Kara M. Kockelman,et al.
Behavioral distinctions : the use of light-duty trucks and passenger cars
,
2000
.
[8]
J. Gibson.
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
,
1979
.
[9]
Walter W. Wierwille,et al.
The Influence of Motion and Audio Cues on Driver Performance in an Automobile Simulator
,
1975
.
[10]
Charles M Farmer,et al.
Rollover risk of cars and light trucks after accounting for driver and environmental factors.
,
2002,
Accident Analysis and Prevention.
[11]
Claudia M. Hunter,et al.
Mapping the physical world to psychological reality: creating synthetic environments
,
2000,
DIS '00.
[12]
Dennis Utter.
PASSENGER VEHICLE DRIVER CELL PHONE USE: RESULTS FROM THE FALL 2000 NATIONAL OCCUPANT PROTECTION USE SURVEY
,
2001
.