A low energy and adaptive routing architecture for efficient field monitoring in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks

Wireless Sensor Networks are composed of low cost and extremely power constrained sensor nodes scattered over a spatial region. They form multi-hop and self organized networks, making energy consumption a crucial design issue. Research has shown that clustering sensor nodes is an efficient method to manage energy consumption for prolonging the network lifetime, but most of routing protocols focus on homogeneous sensor networks and they are not optimized for the characteristics of heterogeneous networks, in which a percentage of the sensor nodes is equipped with additional energy capacities. In this paper we evaluate the performance of a new scalable architecture HARP, Hierarchical Adaptive and Reliable Routing Protocol, in a heterogeneous scenario. HARP provides efficient link fault tolerance and also supports node mobility management. Furthermore, a new cluster head election formulation protocol (s-HARP) has been adapted to heterogeneous networks. Our performance evaluation has shown that HARP and sHARP can significantly reduce the energy consumption and prolong the useful lifetime of the network outperforming some popular existing clustering protocols.

[1]  Ossama Younis,et al.  Distributed clustering in ad-hoc sensor networks: a hybrid, energy-efficient approach , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[2]  Andreas Willig,et al.  Protocols and Architectures for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2005 .

[3]  Zhang Zhenchuan,et al.  Research of improved clustering routing algorithm based on load balance in wireless sensor networks , 2009 .

[4]  JAMAL N. AL-KARAKI,et al.  Routing techniques in wireless sensor networks: a survey , 2004, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[5]  Wendi Heinzelman,et al.  Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[6]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  Mobility improves coverage of sensor networks , 2005, MobiHoc '05.

[7]  Ossama Younis,et al.  Node clustering in wireless sensor networks: recent developments and deployment challenges , 2006, IEEE Network.

[8]  Giuseppe Anastasi,et al.  An Adaptive Data-transfer Protocol for Sensor Networks with Data Mules , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks.

[9]  Kristofer S. J. Pister,et al.  Design of an Autonomous Jumping Microrobot , 2022 .

[10]  Azer Bestavros,et al.  SEP: A Stable Election Protocol for clustered heterogeneous wireless sensor networks , 2004 .

[11]  Jiannong Cao,et al.  An Energy-Aware Protocol for Data Gathering Applications in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[12]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[13]  Joseph A. Paradiso,et al.  Parasitic Mobility for Pervasive Sensor Networks , 2005, Pervasive.

[14]  Jie Liu,et al.  An Improvement and Simulation of LEACH Protocol for Wireless Sensor Network , 2010, 2010 First International Conference on Pervasive Computing, Signal Processing and Applications.

[15]  Juan Vicente Capella,et al.  A New Energy-Efficient, Scalable and Robust Architecture for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2009, 2009 3rd International Conference on New Technologies, Mobility and Security.

[16]  Muhammad Omer Farooq,et al.  MR-LEACH: Multi-hop Routing with Low Energy Adaptive Clustering Hierarchy , 2010, 2010 Fourth International Conference on Sensor Technologies and Applications.

[17]  Qing Zhao,et al.  On the lifetime of wireless sensor networks , 2005, IEEE Communications Letters.