Circular Networks from Distorted Metrics

Trees have long been used as a graphical representation of species relationships. However complex evolutionary events, such as genetic reassortments or hybrid speciations which occur commonly in viruses, bacteria and plants, do not fit into this elementary framework. Alternatively, various network representations have been developed. Circular networks are a natural generalization of leaf-labeled trees interpreted as split systems, that is, collections of bipartitions over leaf labels corresponding to current species. Although such networks do not explicitly model specific evolutionary events of interest, their straightforward visualization and fast reconstruction have made them a popular exploratory tool to detect network-like evolution in genetic datasets. Standard reconstruction methods for circular networks, such as Neighbor-Net, rely on an associated metric on the species set. Such a metric is first estimated from DNA sequences, which leads to a key difficulty: distantly related sequences produce statistically unreliable estimates. This is problematic for Neighbor-Net as it is based on the popular tree reconstruction method Neighbor-Joining, whose sensitivity to distance estimation errors is well established theoretically. In the tree case, more robust reconstruction methods have been developed using the notion of a distorted metric, which captures the dependence of the error in the distance through a radius of accuracy. Here we design the first circular network reconstruction method based on distorted metrics. Our method is computationally efficient. Moreover, the analysis of its radius of accuracy highlights the important role played by the maximum incompatibility, a measure of the extent to which the network differs from a tree.

[1]  T. Jukes CHAPTER 24 – Evolution of Protein Molecules , 1969 .

[2]  P. Buneman The Recovery of Trees from Measures of Dissimilarity , 1971 .

[3]  S. Jeffery Evolution of Protein Molecules , 1979 .

[4]  A. Dress,et al.  A canonical decomposition theory for metrics on a finite set , 1992 .

[5]  M. Steel Recovering a tree from the leaf colourations it generates under a Markov model , 1994 .

[6]  P. Erdös,et al.  A few logs suffice to build (almost) all trees (l): part I , 1997 .

[7]  Tandy J. Warnow,et al.  A Few Logs Suffice to Build (almost) All Trees: Part II , 1999, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[8]  Daniel H. Huson,et al.  Disk-Covering, a Fast-Converging Method for Phylogenetic Tree Reconstruction , 1999, J. Comput. Biol..

[9]  Paul W. Goldberg,et al.  Evolutionary Trees Can be Learned in Polynomial Time in the Two-State General Markov Model , 2001, SIAM J. Comput..

[10]  Li Zhang,et al.  On the complexity of distance-based evolutionary tree reconstruction , 2003, SODA '03.

[11]  Bernard M. E. Moret,et al.  Rec-I-DCM3: a fast algorithmic technique for reconstructing phylogenetic trees , 2004, Proceedings. 2004 IEEE Computational Systems Bioinformatics Conference, 2004. CSB 2004..

[12]  Luay Nakhleh,et al.  Phylogenetic networks , 2004 .

[13]  V. Moulton,et al.  Neighbor-net: an agglomerative method for the construction of phylogenetic networks. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[14]  Tandy J. Warnow,et al.  Rec-I-DCM3: A Fast Algorithmic Technique for Reconstructing Large Phylogenetic Trees , 2004, IEEE Computer Society Computational Systems Bioinformatics Conference.

[15]  Elchanan Mossel,et al.  Learning nonsingular phylogenies and hidden Markov models , 2005, STOC '05.

[16]  D. Huson,et al.  Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[17]  Joseph T. Chang,et al.  A signal-to-noise analysis of phylogeny estimation by neighbor-joining: Insufficiency of polynomial length sequences. , 2006, Mathematical biosciences.

[18]  D. Bryant 17 Extending Tree Models to Split Networks , 2006 .

[19]  Elchanan Mossel Distorted Metrics on Trees and Phylogenetic Forests , 2007, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics.

[20]  Elchanan Mossel,et al.  Phylogenies without Branch Bounds: Contracting the Short, Pruning the Deep , 2008, SIAM J. Discret. Math..

[21]  David Lindley,et al.  CBMS-NSF REGIONAL CONFERENCE SERIES IN APPLIED MATHEMATICS , 2010 .

[22]  Daniel H. Huson,et al.  Phylogenetic Networks - Concepts, Algorithms and Applications , 2011 .

[23]  Lior Pachter,et al.  The neighbor-net algorithm , 2007, Adv. Appl. Math..

[24]  Sagi Snir,et al.  Fast and reliable reconstruction of phylogenetic trees with indistinguishable edges , 2012, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[25]  Mike A. Steel,et al.  Phylogeny - discrete and random processes in evolution , 2016, CBMS-NSF regional conference series in applied mathematics.

[26]  Tandy Warnow,et al.  Computational Phylogenetics: An Introduction to Designing Methods for Phylogeny Estimation , 2017 .

[27]  T. Turner Phylogenetics , 2018, The International Encyclopedia of Biological Anthropology.