Mechanisms of Attention.

Publisher Summary The concept of attention lies at the very core of cognitive psychology. Some people consider this concept to be the primary feature distinguishing the cognitive school from classical behavior theory. According to some classic theories of learning, any conditionable stimulus that reliably precedes a conditionable response by a short amount of time will come to elicit that response. Such theories regard people and animals as passive receivers and transformers of information from the environment. This chapter presents an analysis on the concept of attention, the two kinds of processing limitations of brain, and the illustrative difficulties for single-channel theory. The central assumption in single-channel theory is a processing limitation in translating information in the sensory buffer to long-term memory. The information in long-term memory may be the name of the stimulus, the meaning of the stimulus, or some other information, such as the response to be made to the stimulus. The general question that emerges is whether more than one signal has simultaneous and unimpaired access to signal-related information stored in memory. The chapter also discusses processing multiple signals and the problem of stimulus integrality.

[1]  A. Treisman,et al.  Can simultaneous speech stimuli be classified in parallel? , 1971 .

[2]  M I Posner,et al.  Attention to visual and kinesthetic components of skills. , 1974, Brain research.

[3]  G S REYNOLDS,et al.  Attention in the pigeon. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[4]  R. E. Warren,et al.  Stimulus encoding and memory. , 1972 .

[5]  S W Keele,et al.  Processing demands of sequential information , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[6]  M Gregory,et al.  Psychological refractory period and the length of time required to make a decision , 1967, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[7]  A. T. Welford,et al.  Evidence of a Single-Channel Decision Mechanism Limiting Performance in a Serial Reaction Task* , 1959 .

[8]  H L Hawkins,et al.  Precategorical selective attention and tonal specificity in auditory recognition. , 1974, Journal of Experimental Psychology.

[9]  John J. L. Morton,et al.  Interaction of information in word recognition. , 1969 .

[10]  G. S. Klein,et al.  SEMANTIC POWER MEASURED THROUGH THE INTERFERENCE OF WORDS WITH COLOR-NAMING. , 1964, The American journal of psychology.

[11]  Richard T. Kelly,et al.  Measurement of organizational processes within memory stages , 1973 .

[12]  D Gopher,et al.  Individual Differences in Attention and the Prediction of Flight Criteria , 1971, Perceptual and motor skills.

[13]  Carol Conrad,et al.  Context effects in sentence comprehension: A study of the subjective lexicon , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[14]  T. Shallice,et al.  Word Recognition in a Phonemic Dyslexic Patient , 1975, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Chapter 2 – ATTENTION: THE PROCESSING OF MULTIPLE SOURCES OF INFORMATION* , 1974 .

[16]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing , 1970 .

[17]  J. Baron,et al.  Individual differences in speed of phonemic analysis, visual analysis, and reading. , 1975, Acta Psychologica.

[18]  W. R. Garner,et al.  The effects on speeded classification of implicit and explicit instructions regarding redundant dimensions , 1971 .

[19]  C. R. Snyder Selection, inspection, and naming in visual search. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  D E BROADBENT Listening between and during practiced auditory distractions. , 1956, British journal of psychology.

[21]  S. Keele Effects of input and output on decision time. , 1970 .

[22]  R. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Lexical ambiguity, semantic context, and visual word recognition. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  N. Kroll,et al.  Autonomic responses to shock-associated words in a nonattended message: a failure to replicate. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  E. Archer,et al.  Identification of visual patterns as a function of information load. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  D. Broadbent,et al.  Donders'B- and C-reactions and S-R compatibility. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[26]  M I Posner,et al.  Chronometric analysis of classification. , 1967, Psychological review.

[27]  D. Norman Toward a theory of memory and attention. , 1968 .

[28]  I. Biederman,et al.  Processing redundant information , 1970 .

[29]  Earl A. Alluisi,et al.  Effects of discriminability and irrelevant information on absolute judgments’ , 1967 .

[30]  Howard E. Egeth,et al.  Parallel processing of multielement displays , 1972 .

[31]  D. Broadbent,et al.  ON THE INTERACTION OF S-R COMPATIBILITY WITH OTHER VARIABLES AFFECTING REACTION TIME. , 1965, British journal of psychology.

[32]  A. T. Welford,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT OF SENSORY-MOTOR PERFORMANCE : SURVEY AND REAPPRAISAL OF TWELVE YEARS' PROGRESS , 1960 .

[33]  C. T. James The Role of Semantic Information in Lexical Decisions. , 1975 .

[34]  E M Comstock,et al.  Processing capacity in a letter-matching task. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[35]  P. Fitts,et al.  S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[36]  A Pollatsek,et al.  Familiarity affects visual processing of words. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  E. C. Cherry Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears , 1953 .

[38]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Judging up and down. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  G. Lockhead Processing dimensional stimuli: a note. , 1972, Psychological review.

[40]  H. K. Beller,et al.  Parallel and serial stages in matching. , 1970 .

[41]  A Treisman,et al.  Semantic processing in dichotic listening? A replication , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[42]  A. Treisman Strategies and models of selective attention. , 1969, Psychological review.

[43]  Leslie Henderson,et al.  A Word Superiority Effect without Orthographic Assistance , 1974 .

[44]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  Subtractive method applied to separation of visual and name components of multiletter arrays , 1969 .

[45]  D Kahneman,et al.  Reaction time in focused and in divided attention. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[46]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  Hemispheric specialization for speech perception. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[47]  S. Keele Attention demands of memory retrieval. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[48]  S. Keele Effects of Input and Output Modes on Decision Time. , 1970 .

[49]  John Morton,et al.  The use of correlated stimulus information in card sorting , 1969 .

[50]  J. Baron,et al.  Use of orthographic and word-specific knowledge in reading words aloud. , 1976 .

[51]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Perception of Letters in Words: Seek Not and Ye Shall Find , 1974, Science.

[52]  M. V. Rhoades,et al.  On the Reduction of Choice Reaction Times with Practice , 1959 .

[53]  N Moray,et al.  Attention, practice, and semantic targets. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[54]  J. Deutsch,et al.  Attention: Some theoretical considerations. , 1963 .

[55]  H. Hawkins,et al.  Flexible coding in word recognition. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[56]  T Shallice,et al.  Dual functions of consciousness. , 1972, Psychological review.

[57]  E. A. Alluisi,et al.  Some variables influencing the rate of gain of information. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[58]  Anne Treisman,et al.  Monitoring and storage of irrelevant messages in selective attention , 1964 .

[59]  J. A. Leonard Tactual Choice Reactions: I , 1959 .

[60]  G. M. Reicher Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[61]  A. Treisman THE EFFECT OF IRRELEVANT MATERIAL ON THE EFFICIENCY OF SELECTIVE LISTENING. , 1964, The American journal of psychology.

[62]  W. Neill,et al.  Inhibitory and facilitatory processes in selective attention. , 1977 .

[63]  Stephen J. Boies,et al.  Components of attention. , 1971 .

[64]  P M FITTS,et al.  Cognitive aspects of information processing: II. Adjustments to stimulus redundancy. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[65]  G Cohen,et al.  Some Evidence for Parallel Comparisons in a Letter Recognition Task , 1969, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[66]  M. Posner,et al.  On the functions of consciousness , 1973 .

[67]  M. C. Smith,et al.  The effect of varying information on the psychological refractory period , 1969 .

[68]  L. Karlin,et al.  Effects of Number of Alternatives on the Psychological Refractory Period , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[69]  J. Morton,et al.  Categories of interference: verbal mediation and conflict in card sorting. , 1969, British journal of psychology.

[70]  W. E. Hick Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1948, Nature.

[71]  J. Lewis,et al.  Semantic processing of unattended messages using dichotic listening. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[72]  D. D. Wheeler Processes in word recognition , 1970 .

[73]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Relation of a test of attention to road accidents. , 1973 .

[74]  J. Baron,et al.  An analysis of the word-superiority effect☆ , 1973 .

[75]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[76]  F. Dyer Interference and facilitation for color naming with separate bilateral presentations of the word and color. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[77]  J. H. Neely Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. , 1977 .

[78]  W. Eichelman,et al.  Familiarity effects in the simultaneous matching task. , 1970 .

[79]  J. Marshall,et al.  Patterns of paralexia: A psycholinguistic approach , 1973 .

[80]  D L Hintzman,et al.  "Stroop" effect: input or output phenomenon? , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[81]  Roger W. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Effects of complexity in simultaneous reaction time tasks. , 1969 .

[82]  R. Hyman Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[83]  W. Chase,et al.  Parallel processing in item recognition , 1971 .

[84]  Arnold Well,et al.  The influence of irrelevant information on speeded classification tasks , 1971 .

[85]  B. Kerr,et al.  Processing demands during mental operations , 1973, Memory & cognition.