Metric and Scale Design as Choice Architecture Tools

Interest is increasing in using behavioral decision insights to design better product labels. A specific policy target is the fuel economy label, which policy makers can use to encourage reduction in carbon dioxide emissions from transport-related fossil-fuel combustion. In two online experiments, the authors examine whether vehicle preferences can be shifted toward more fuel-efficient vehicles by manipulating the metric (consumption of gas vs. cost of gas) and scale (100 miles vs. 15,000 miles vs. 100,000 miles) on which fuel economy information is expressed. They find that preference for fuel-efficient vehicles is highest when fuel economy is expressed in terms of the cost of gas over 100,000 miles, regardless of whether the vehicle pays for its higher price in gas savings. The authors discuss the underlying psychological mechanisms for this finding, including compatibility, anchoring, and familiarity effects, and conclude that policy makers should initiate programs that communicate fuel-efficiency information in terms of costs over an expanded, lifetime scale.

[1]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The Construction of Preference: Do Defaults Save Lives? , 2006 .

[2]  Benjamin Le,et al.  Building a model of commitment to the natural environment to predict ecological behavior and willingness to sacrifice , 2011 .

[3]  G. W. Fischer,et al.  Strategy compatibility, scale compatibility, and the prominence effect. , 1993 .

[4]  D. Goldstein,et al.  Word count: 3998 Corresponding author: , 2022 .

[5]  W. Bickel,et al.  Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  The Effect of Life Cycle Cost Information on Consumer Investment Decisions Regarding Eco‐Innovation , 2009 .

[7]  R. Thaler,et al.  Anomalies: Intertemporal Choice , 1989 .

[8]  Dustin B. Thoman,et al.  Dimensionality of the New Ecological Paradigm , 2012 .

[9]  S. Frederick Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 4—Fall 2005—Pages 25–42 Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making , 2022 .

[10]  P. Slovic,et al.  The Construction of Preference: Index , 2006 .

[11]  David J. Hardisty,et al.  Discounting Future Green: Money Vs. The Environment , 2009 .

[12]  Richard P. Larrick,et al.  The MPG Illusion , 2008, Science.

[13]  John T. Gourville Pennies-a-Day: The Effect of Temporal Reframing on Transaction Evaluation , 1998 .

[14]  J. Bailey,et al.  Moving Toward Sustainability , 2008 .

[15]  James E. McMahon,et al.  Governments should implement energy-efficiency standards and labels--cautiously , 2003 .

[16]  Scot Burton,et al.  Effects of Alternative Nutrition Label Formats and Nutrition Reference Information on Consumer Perceptions, Comprehension, and Product Evaluations , 1994 .

[17]  Sophie Hieke,et al.  A Critical Review of the Literature on Nutritional Labeling , 2012 .

[18]  B. Rimer,et al.  General Performance on a Numeracy Scale among Highly Educated Samples , 2001, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[19]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. , 1992 .

[20]  R. Thaler Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency , 1981 .

[21]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[22]  Mario Pandelaere,et al.  How to Make a 29% Increase Look Bigger: The Unit Effect in Option Comparisons , 2011 .

[23]  Richard P. Larrick,et al.  Six of One, Half Dozen of the Other , 2009, Psychological science.

[24]  David Laibson,et al.  Commentary on “Choice Bracketing” by Read, Loewenstein and Rabin , 1999 .

[25]  David Hammond,et al.  Nutrition labels on pre-packaged foods: a systematic review , 2011, Public Health Nutrition.

[26]  B. Verplanken,et al.  Graphical energy labels and consumers' decisions about home appliances: A process tracing approach , 1993 .

[27]  Improvement,et al.  Adult literacy in America : a first look at the results of the National Adult Literacy Survey , 1993 .

[28]  David J. Hardisty,et al.  Discounting future green: money versus the environment. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[29]  R. Thaler,et al.  Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness , 2008 .

[30]  Ben R. Newell,et al.  ThE PSyChOlOgy Of glOBAl WARMINg Improving the Fit between the Science and the Message , 2010 .

[31]  Martijn Gough Climate change , 2009, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[32]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Multivariate Behavioral Research Quantifying and Testing Indirect Effects in Simple Mediation Models When the Constituent Paths Are Nonlinear , 2022 .

[33]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[34]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Time and Decision: Economic and Psychological Perspectives of Intertemporal Choice , 2003 .

[35]  E. Weber,et al.  Public Understanding of Climate Change in the United States Scientific Understanding of Climate Change These Assess- Ments Support the following Conclusions with High Or , 2011 .

[36]  P. Slovic,et al.  Numeracy skill and the communication, comprehension, and use of risk-benefit information. , 2007, Health affairs.

[37]  Chris Arney Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness , 2015 .

[38]  W. Bickel,et al.  Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. , 1999 .

[39]  Thomas Gilovich,et al.  Are Adjustments Insufficient? , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[40]  John W. Payne,et al.  The adaptive decision maker: Name index , 1993 .

[41]  Hans van Trijp,et al.  Consumer preferences for front-of-pack calories labelling , 2008, Public Health Nutrition.

[42]  John W. Payne,et al.  Contingent decision behavior. , 1982 .

[43]  Adam J. Berinsky,et al.  Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk , 2012, Political Analysis.

[44]  M. Simpson Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States , 2011 .

[45]  P. Slovic The Construction of Preference , 1995 .

[46]  Mario Pandelaere,et al.  Are All Units Created Equal? The Effect of Default Units on Product Evaluations , 2013 .

[47]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking , 1992 .

[48]  Edward T. Cokely,et al.  Measuring Risk Literacy: The Berlin Numeracy Test , 2012, Judgment and Decision Making.

[49]  Joe Bull,et al.  Loads of green washing—can behavioural economics increase willingness-to-pay for efficient washing machines in the UK? , 2012 .

[50]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[51]  John D. Claxton,et al.  Barriers to Consumer Choice of Energy Efficient Products , 1982 .

[52]  K. Kirby,et al.  Delay-discounting probabilistic rewards: Rates decrease as amounts increase , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[53]  Iris Vessey,et al.  Cognitive Fit: A Theory‐Based Analysis of the Graphs Versus Tables Literature* , 1991 .

[54]  Daniel G. Goldstein,et al.  Beyond nudges: Tools of a choice architecture , 2012 .

[55]  Daniel Read,et al.  Choice Bracketing , 1999 .

[56]  Peter H. M. P. Roelofsma,et al.  Anomalies in intertemporal choice , 1996 .

[57]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Answering behavioral questions about energy efficiency in buildings , 1987 .

[58]  Chris Park,et al.  The Environment , 2010 .

[59]  P. Eng CO2 emissions from fuel combustion: highlights , 2009 .

[60]  E. Demidenko,et al.  Mixed Models: Theory and Applications (Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics) , 2004 .

[61]  Stefanie Heinzle,et al.  Disclosure of Energy Operating Cost Information: A Silver Bullet for Overcoming the Energy-Efficiency Gap? , 2012 .

[62]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Reactance to Recommendations: When Unsolicited Advice Yields Contrary Responses , 2004 .

[63]  Paul W. Miniard,et al.  Another Look at the Impact of Reference Information on Consumer Impressions of Nutrition Information , 1996 .

[64]  F. Strack,et al.  Explaining the Enigmatic Anchoring Effect: Mechanisms of Selective Accessibility , 1997 .

[65]  R. Thaler,et al.  Save More Tomorrow™: Using Behavioral Economics to Increase Employee Saving , 2004, Journal of Political Economy.

[66]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale , 2000 .

[67]  B. Frey,et al.  Choice under Uncertainty: Problems Solved and Unsolved: Comment , 1989 .