Fired ceramic inlays: a 6-year follow up.

[1]  P. Hörstedt,et al.  Marginal breakdown of 5-year-old direct composite inlays. , 1996, Journal of dentistry.

[2]  S C Bayne,et al.  The clinical performance of CAD-CAM-generated ceramic inlays: a four-year study. , 1996, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[3]  K. Hiller,et al.  In-vivo evaluation of a feldspathic ceramic system: 2-year results. , 1996, Journal of dentistry.

[4]  M. Molin,et al.  A 3-year clinical follow-up study of a ceramic (Optec) inlay system. , 1996, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[5]  G. Willems,et al.  Clinical and semiquantitative marginal analysis of four tooth-coloured inlay systems at 3 years. , 1995, E -journal of dentistry.

[6]  P. Tidehag,et al.  A 2-year clinical follow-up study of IPS Empress ceramic inlays. , 1995, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[7]  S. Karlsson,et al.  Ceramic inlay systems: some clinical aspects. , 1995, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[8]  F. Isidor,et al.  A clinical evaluation of porcelain inlays. , 1995, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[9]  N. Creugers,et al.  2.5 Year Report of a Clinical-Trial on 3 Different Types of Veneer Restorations , 1995 .

[10]  G Sjögren,et al.  Ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with either a dual-cured or a chemically cured composite resin luting agent. A 2-year clinical study. , 1995, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[11]  J. V. Dijken.  A 6-year evaluation of a direct composite resin inlay/onlay system and glass ionomer cement-composite resin sandwich restorations. , 1994 .

[12]  P. Hörstedt,et al.  Marginal breakdown of fired ceramic inlays cemented with glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement or resin composite. , 1994, Journal of dentistry.

[13]  M. Tyas.  Dental amalgam--what are the alternatives? , 1994, International dental journal.

[14]  E. Burke,et al.  Aesthetic inlays: composite or ceramic? , 1994, British Dental Journal.

[15]  A. Olofsson,et al.  Three-year comparison of fired ceramic inlays cemented with composite resin or glass ionomer cement. , 1994, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[16]  K F Leinfelder,et al.  Effect of gap dimension on composite resin cement wear. , 1994, Quintessence international.

[17]  C. Kreulen,et al.  Prevalence of postoperative sensitivity with indirect Class II resin composite inlays. , 1993, ASDC journal of dentistry for children.

[18]  L. Matsson,et al.  Clinical evaluation of glass ceramic inlays (Dicor). , 1993, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[19]  K F Leinfelder,et al.  Three-year clinical evaluation of CAD/CAM restorations. , 1992, Journal of esthetic dentistry.

[20]  F Lutz,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a new pressed glass ceramic inlay material over 1.5 years. , 1992, Quintessence international.

[21]  M. Molin,et al.  A clinical evaluation of the Optec inlay system. , 1992, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[22]  A. Olofsson,et al.  A clinical evaluation of adhesively luted ceramic inlays. A two year follow-up study. , 1992, Swedish dental journal.

[23]  G Sjögren,et al.  A clinical examination of ceramic (Cerec) inlays. , 1992, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[24]  I. Mjör,et al.  Placement and longevity of tooth-colored restorations in Denmark. , 1990, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[25]  N. Wilson,et al.  Porcelain inlay: a historical view. , 1990, Operative dentistry.

[26]  Jensen Me,et al.  A two-year clinical study of posterior etched-porcelain resin-bonded restorations. , 1988 .

[27]  J. V. Dijken.  A clinical evaluation of anterior conventional, microflller, and hybrid composite resin fillings: A 6-year follow-up study , 1986 .

[28]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.