Implication of PSA uncertainties on risk-informed decision making

Abstract Nuclear power plants risk-informed policy is introduced in order to improve safety decision making and regulatory efficiency. The corresponding regulatory guides define the acceptable risk measures and their changes resulting from the modifications in the licensed design of the nuclear power plant. The risk measures used in the acceptance guidelines are the core damage frequency and large early release frequency. The risk measures and their corresponding changes are assessed by the Probabilistic Safety Assessment. The uncertainties of Probabilistic Safety Assessment should be appropriately addressed in the context of the decision making, considering their implication on the obtained results. The Probabilistic Safety Assessment uncertainties include epistemic uncertainties resulting from parameter, model, and completeness uncertainties. The paper presents the obtained results from the uncertainty analysis of the Probabilistic Safety Assessment of the reference nuclear power plant and their implication on risk-informed decision making. The paper focuses particularly on parameter and model uncertainties. The analysed modification is extension of the test interval of the emergency diesel generators. The core damage frequency is the used risk measure in the analysis. The need for the appropriate consideration of the uncertainties in the Probabilistic Safety Assessment in order to adequately support the risk-informed decision making is identified. The deficiency of usage of percentile measures is identified and acknowledged. The need for the adaptation of the risk-informed decision-making principles considering new nuclear power plants is recognized.

[1]  Timothy A. Wheeler,et al.  Guidance on the Treatment of Uncertainties Associated with PRAs in Risk-Informed Decision Making , 2009 .

[2]  G. Apostolakis The concept of probability in safety assessments of technological systems. , 1990, Science.

[3]  Andrej Prošek,et al.  RELAP5/MOD3. 3 best estimate analyses for human reliability analysis , 2010 .

[4]  A. Introduction,et al.  AN APPROACH FOR USING PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT IN RISK-INFORMED DECISIONS ON PLANT- SPECIFIC CHANGES TO THE LICENSING BASIS , 2009 .

[5]  M Cepin Adapted principles of risk-informed decision-making for new nuclear power plants , 2009 .

[6]  R. C. Bertucio,et al.  Analysis of core damage frequency, Surry, Unit 1 internal events appendices , 1990 .

[7]  A. Prošek,et al.  The State-of-the-Art Theory and Applications of Best-Estimate Plus Uncertainty Methods , 2007 .

[8]  J Peschke,et al.  Model uncertainties in a PSA for a nuclear power plant , 2009 .

[9]  Mary Drouin,et al.  Treatment of Uncertainties Associated with PRAs in Risk-Informed Decision Making (NUREG-1855) , 2009 .

[10]  Borut Mavko,et al.  A dynamic fault tree , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[11]  Marko Čepin Comparison of Methods for Dependency Determination between Human Failure Events within Human Reliability Analysis , 2008 .

[12]  Andrej Prošek,et al.  Success criteria time windows of operator actions using RELAP5/MOD3.3 within human reliability analysis , 2008 .

[13]  Francesco Saverio D'Auria,et al.  Quantitative assessment of thermal–hydraulic codes used for heavy water reactor calculations , 2006 .

[14]  Marko Cepin Analysis of truncation limit in probabilistic safety assessment , 2005, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[15]  Jussi K. Vaurio Uncertainties and quantification of common cause failure rates and probabilities for system analyses , 2005, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[16]  Marko Cepin DEPEND-HRA - A method for consideration of dependency in human reliability analysis , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..