Decentralized modal identification of structures using parallel factor decomposition and sparse blind source separation

Abstract In this paper, a novel decentralized modal identification method is proposed utilizing the concepts of sparse blind source separation (BSS) and parallel factor decomposition. Unlike popular ambient modal identification methods which require large arrays of simultaneous vibration measurements, the decentralized algorithm presented here operates on partial measurements, utilizing a sub-set of sensors at-a-time. Mathematically, this leads to an underdetermined source separation problem, which is addressed using sparsifying wavelet transforms. The proposed method builds on a previously presented concept by the authors, which utilizes the stationary wavelet packet transform (SWPT) to generate an over-complete dictionary of sparse bases. However, the redundant SWPT can be computationally intensive depending on the bandwidth of the signals and the sampling frequency of the vibration measurements. This issue of computational burden is alleviated through a new method proposed here, which is based on a multi-linear algebra tool called PARAllel FACtor (PARAFAC) decomposition. At the core of this method, the wavelet packet decomposition coefficients are used to form a covariance tensor, followed by PARAFAC tensor decomposition to separate the modal responses. The underdetermined source identifiability of PARAFAC enables source separation in wavelet packet coefficients with considerable mode mixing, thereby relaxing the conditions to generate over-complete bases, thus reducing the computational burden. The proposed method is validated using a series of numerical simulations followed by an implementation on recorded ambient vibration measurements obtained from the UCLA factor building.

[1]  Hervé Carfantan,et al.  Time-invariant orthonormal wavelet representations , 1996, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[2]  Rasmus Bro,et al.  Multi-way Analysis with Applications in the Chemical Sciences , 2004 .

[3]  Jérôme Antoni,et al.  An Alternating Least Squares (ALS) based Blind Source Separation Algorithm for Operational Modal Analysis , 2011 .

[4]  S. Narasimhan,et al.  Blind identification of earthquake-excited structures , 2012 .

[5]  Sriram Narasimhan,et al.  Hybrid Time‐Frequency Blind Source Separation Towards Ambient System Identification of Structures , 2012, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[6]  Sung-Han Sim,et al.  Automated decentralized modal analysis using smart sensors , 2010 .

[7]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Distributed computing strategy for structural health monitoring , 2006 .

[8]  B. Silverman,et al.  The Stationary Wavelet Transform and some Statistical Applications , 1995 .

[9]  Budhaditya Hazra,et al.  Re-tuning tuned mass dampers using ambient vibration measurements , 2010 .

[10]  Jérôme Antoni,et al.  A study and extension of second-order blind source separation to operational modal analysis , 2013 .

[11]  Rasmus Bro,et al.  A comparison of algorithms for fitting the PARAFAC model , 2006, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[12]  Nuno M. M. Maia,et al.  Theoretical and Experimental Modal Analysis , 1997 .

[13]  Roger Ghanem,et al.  A novel approach for the structural identification and monitoring of a full-scale 17-story building based on ambient vibration measurements , 2008 .

[14]  Sriram Narasimhan,et al.  A decentralized blind source separation algorithm for ambient modal identification in the presence of narrowband disturbances , 2014 .

[15]  J. Antoni Blind separation of vibration components: Principles and demonstrations , 2005 .

[16]  S. Narasimhan,et al.  Decentralized modal identification using sparse blind source separation , 2011 .

[17]  L. Lathauwer,et al.  Signal Processing based on Multilinear Algebra , 1997 .

[18]  Sriram Narasimhan,et al.  Blind Source Separation of Convolutive Mixtures towards Modal Identification , 2012 .

[19]  Monica D. Kohler,et al.  Earthquake and Ambient Vibration Monitoring of the Steel-Frame UCLA Factor Building , 2005 .

[20]  Aamir Mahmood,et al.  A Synchronized Wireless Sensor Network for Experimental Modal Analysis in Structural Health Monitoring , 2011, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[21]  Filipe Magalhães,et al.  Challenges in the Application of Stochastic Modal Identification Methods to a Cable-Stayed Bridge , 2007 .

[22]  J. Chang,et al.  Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition , 1970 .

[23]  D. C. Zimmerman,et al.  A framework for blind modal identification using joint approximate diagonalization , 2008 .

[24]  R. Bro PARAFAC. Tutorial and applications , 1997 .

[25]  D. Chelidze,et al.  Blind source separation based vibration mode identification , 2007 .

[26]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis , 1999, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[27]  S. Narasimhan,et al.  Wavelet-based blind identification of the UCLA Factor building using ambient and earthquake responses , 2010 .

[28]  Lieven De Lathauwer,et al.  Blind Identification of Underdetermined Mixtures by Simultaneous Matrix Diagonalization , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[29]  Mahesh D. Pandey,et al.  Modified Cross-Correlation Method for the Blind Identification of Structures , 2010 .

[30]  S. Mallat A wavelet tour of signal processing , 1998 .

[31]  Sung-Han Sim,et al.  Decentralized random decrement technique for efficient data aggregation and system identification in wireless smart sensor networks , 2011 .

[32]  Budhaditya Hazra,et al.  Underdetermined Blind Identification of Structures by Using the Modified Cross-Correlation Method , 2012 .

[33]  Bo Hu,et al.  Blind source separation towards decentralized modal identification using compressive sampling , 2012, 2012 11th International Conference on Information Science, Signal Processing and their Applications (ISSPA).

[34]  C. Papadimitriou,et al.  The effect of prediction error correlation on optimal sensor placement in structural dynamics , 2012 .

[35]  Richard A. Harshman,et al.  Foundations of the PARAFAC procedure: Models and conditions for an "explanatory" multi-model factor analysis , 1970 .

[36]  Costas Papadimitriou,et al.  Reliability of uncertain dynamical systems with multiple design points , 1999 .

[37]  Eric Moulines,et al.  A blind source separation technique using second-order statistics , 1997, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[38]  Barak A. Pearlmutter,et al.  Blind source separation by sparse decomposition , 2000, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[39]  Barak A. Pearlmutter,et al.  Blind Source Separation by Sparse Decomposition in a Signal Dictionary , 2001, Neural Computation.

[40]  J. Kruskal Three-way arrays: rank and uniqueness of trilinear decompositions, with application to arithmetic complexity and statistics , 1977 .

[41]  Yongchao Yang,et al.  Time-Frequency Blind Source Separation Using Independent Component Analysis for Output-Only Modal Identification of Highly Damped Structures , 2013 .

[42]  Ertugrul Taciroglu,et al.  Response‐only modal identification of structures using limited sensors , 2013 .

[43]  L. Lathauwer,et al.  Sufficient conditions for uniqueness in Candecomp/Parafac and Indscal with random component matrices , 2006, Psychometrika.

[44]  Jerome P. Lynch,et al.  Automated Modal Parameter Estimation by Parallel Processing within Wireless Monitoring Systems , 2008 .

[45]  Jean-Claude Golinval,et al.  Physical interpretation of independent component analysis in structural dynamics , 2007 .

[46]  M. Victor Wickerhauser,et al.  Adapted wavelet analysis from theory to software , 1994 .

[47]  Gaëtan Kerschen,et al.  Output-only modal analysis using blind source separation techniques , 2007 .