Flüssigkeitsdämpfer zur Reduktion periodischer und stochastischer Schwingungen turmartiger Bauwerke

The tuned liquid column damper (TLCD), patented by Frahm already in 1910, consists of a Ushaped tube system filled with a Newtonian liquid. The tuned parameters of the liquid damper enable the liquid mass to oscillate with a 90° phase shift with respect to the motion of the structure, leading to interaction forces on the primary structure such as viscous damping loads. The oscillation energy of the liquid dissipates in the tube system because of turbulence effects and local pressure loss caused by friction. The mathematical expression of the liquid motion is carried out using the instationary Bernoulli equation. The natural frequency of the liquid damper depends on the geometry of the tube system. The dissipation forces of the absorber result from the impulse, which is caused by the liquid column motion. In order to determine the parameters of the liquid damper the tuning criteria of Den Hartog, Warburton and Lyapunov, which are valid for mechanical dampers, can be applied through the already known analogy approaches. The results of these criteria are the optimal natural frequency and the optimal damping ratio of the liquid damper. The geometry factors of the liquid damper affect the effective liquid mass ratio, which is critical for the reduction of the oscillation. The geometry factors are defined by the angle of inclination of the vertical stream line of fluid flow, the sectional area and the length of the liquid column. In order to solve the optimization problem in the research works so far developed, the geometry factors have always been assumed as known values. As the absorber efficiency depends not only on the tuning of the natural frequency and the damping ratio but also on the effective liquid mass ratio, the geometry factors must be included in the optimization procedure of the liquid damper. To achieve this purpose in this research work the tuning criteria of Den Hartog, Warburton and as well as Lyapunov are set up with a new expanded optimization approach. The practical application of the new optimization approach is demonstrated with the aid of two examples. The first example deals with a wind turbine, which is periodically excited by a non-uniform wind flow. The second example shows the application on a seismically excited benchmark building. The efficiency of the liquid damper and the influence of the absorber parameter are calculated through sensitivity analysis and compared with the conventional mechanical tuned mass dampers. This research work includes the conceptual design of a new semi-active liquid damper. The nonlinear equations of motion as well as the interaction forces are mathematically derived and the damper efficiency is numerically validated.

[1]  Linsheng Huo,et al.  Advances in Structural Control in Civil Engineering in China , 2010 .

[2]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Benchmark problems in structural control : Part II : Active tendon system , 1998 .

[3]  Yoshiki Ikeda ACTIVE AND SEMI-ACTIVE CONTROL OF BUILDINGS IN JAPAN , 2004 .

[4]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Next Generation Bench-mark Control Problems for Seismically Excited Buildings , 1999 .

[5]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering , 1995 .

[6]  Akira Fukukita,et al.  Control Effect for 20-Story Benchmark Building Using Passive or Semiactive Device , 2004 .

[7]  Hunter Rouse,et al.  Elementary mechanics of fluids , 1946 .

[8]  J. Mann The spatial structure of neutral atmospheric surface-layer turbulence , 1994, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  J. Kaimal,et al.  Spectral Characteristics of Surface-Layer Turbulence , 1972 .

[10]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Benchmark Control Problems for Seismically Excited Nonlinear Buildings , 2004 .

[11]  In-Won Lee,et al.  Optimal Neurocontroller for Nonlinear Benchmark Structure , 2004 .

[12]  G. B. Warburton,et al.  Optimum absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters , 1982 .

[13]  Genda Chen,et al.  Semiactive Control of the 20-Story Benchmark Building with Piezoelectric Friction Dampers , 2004 .

[14]  F. Ziegler,et al.  Technische Mechanik der festen und flüssigen Körper , 1985 .

[15]  Alfred Strauss,et al.  Adaptive Flüssigkeitstilger für Vertikalschwingungen von Ingenieurstrukturen – Teil 2 – Feldversuche , 2007 .

[16]  Junichi Yamashita,et al.  Full-scale measurements of wind-induced responses on the Hamamatsu ACT Tower , 1998 .

[17]  Yutaka Inoue,et al.  Overview of the application of active/semiactive control to building structures in Japan , 2001 .

[18]  Wolfgang Kalide,et al.  Einführung in die technische Strömungslehre , 1971 .

[19]  P. Mahmoodi,et al.  Performance of Viscoelastic Dampers in World Trade Center Towers , 1987 .

[20]  W. J. Hall,et al.  Dynamics of Structures—Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering , 1996 .

[21]  Chi-Chang Lin,et al.  Seismic response reduction of irregular buildings using passive tuned mass dampers , 2000 .

[22]  M. Dolce,et al.  International Seminar on Seismic Isolation, Passive Energy Dissipation and Active Control of Vibrations of Structures , 2006 .

[23]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Benchmark problems in structural control: part I—Active Mass Driver system , 1998 .

[24]  R. Guyan Reduction of stiffness and mass matrices , 1965 .

[25]  Osamu Yoshida,et al.  Seismic Control of a Nonlinear Benchmark Building using Smart Dampers , 2004 .

[26]  Nicholas Fisco,et al.  Smart structures: Part I—Active and semi-active control , 2011 .

[27]  Nicholas Fisco,et al.  Smart structures: Part II — Hybrid control systems and control strategies , 2011 .

[28]  Fahim Sadek,et al.  A METHOD OF ESTIMATING THE PARAMETERS OF TUNED MASS DAMPERS FOR SEISMIC APPLICATIONS , 1997 .

[29]  Ananth Ramaswamy,et al.  Multiobjective Optimal Fuzzy Logic Controller Driven Active and Hybrid Control Systems for Seismically Excited Nonlinear Buildings , 2004 .

[30]  A. G. Thompson,et al.  Optimum tuning and damping of a dynamic vibration absorber applied to a force excited and damped primary system , 1981 .

[31]  T. Kármán Progress in the Statistical Theory of Turbulence , 1948 .

[32]  R. J. Peppin An Introduction to Random Vibrations, Spectral and Wavelet Analysis , 1994 .

[33]  Fahim Sadek,et al.  Single‐ and multiple‐tuned liquid column dampers for seismic applications , 1998 .

[34]  Franz Ziegler,et al.  BI-AXIAL SEISMIC ACTIVATION OF CIVIL ENGINEERING STRUCTURES EQUIPPED WITH TUNED LIQUID COLUMN DAMPERS , 2005 .

[35]  Michael REITERER,et al.  CONTROL OF PEDESTRIAN-INDUCED VIBRATIONS OF FOOTBRIDGES USING TUNED LIQUID COLUMN DAMPERS , 2004 .

[36]  G. Marano,et al.  Stochastic optimum design of linear tuned mass dampers for seismic protection of high towers , 2008 .

[37]  B. Sp,et al.  State of the Art of Structural Control , 2003 .

[38]  Adam J Crewe,et al.  Passive Energy Dissipation Systems in Structural Engineering , 1998 .

[39]  Mario A. Rotea,et al.  Passive structural control of offshore wind turbines , 2011 .

[40]  B. Samali,et al.  Characteristics of multiple tuned liquid column dampers in suppressing structural vibration , 1999 .

[41]  G. R. Noakes,et al.  Vibrations and Waves , 1962, Nature.

[42]  Hamid Reza Karimi,et al.  Semiactive Control for Floating Offshore Wind Turbines Subject to Aero-hydro Dynamic Loads , 2011 .

[43]  Arturo Rodriguez Tsouroukdissian WIND TURBINE TOWER LOAD REDUCTION USING PASSIVE AND SEMI-ACTIVE DAMPERS , 2011 .

[44]  T·S·尼尔森 Damping of oscillations in wind turbines , 2000 .

[45]  YangQuan Chen,et al.  Solving Applied Mathematical Problems with MATLAB , 2008 .

[46]  Franz Ziegler,et al.  Control of pedestrian‐induced vibrations of long‐span bridges , 2006 .

[47]  Erik Lundtang Petersen,et al.  Wind power meteorology. Part I: climate and turbulence , 1998 .

[48]  M. J. Hochrainer Tuned liquid column damper for structural control , 2005 .

[49]  G. B. Warburton,et al.  Optimum absorber parameters for simple systems , 1980 .

[50]  Kenny C. S Kwok,et al.  Fuzzy Controller for Seismically Excited Nonlinear Buildings , 2004 .

[51]  Kenny C. S Kwok,et al.  Vibration control of the wind-excited 76-story benchmark building by liquid column vibration absorbers , 2004 .

[52]  Hong Jin Kim,et al.  Mitigation of Wind-Induced Vibration with Liquid Column Vibration Absorber , 2008 .

[53]  C. Petersen,et al.  Dynamik der Baukonstruktionen , 1996 .

[54]  C. C. Lin,et al.  Vibration Control Identification of Seismically Excited m.d.o.f. Structure-Ptmd Systems , 2001 .

[55]  Jer-Fu Wang,et al.  Vibration Control of Structures with Initially Accelerated Passive Tuned Mass Dampers under Near‐Fault Earthquake Excitation , 2010, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[56]  Z. Sheng Hoffmann氏泛发性疣赘症 , 1964 .

[57]  B. Samali,et al.  Control of Along-Wind Response of Structures by Mass and Liquid Dampers , 1992 .

[58]  G. Marano,et al.  Optimization criteria for tuned mass dampers for structural vibration control under stochastic excitation , 2011 .

[59]  Gary C. Hart,et al.  The structural design of tall and special buildings , 2005 .

[60]  Francesco Marazzi,et al.  Technology of Semiactive Devices and Applications in Vibration Mitigation , 2006 .

[61]  Helmut Sockel AERODYNAMIK DER BAUWERKE , 1984 .

[62]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  Semiactive Tuned Liquid Column Dampers: Experimental Study , 2003 .

[63]  E. D. Booth Concrete structures in earthquake regions : design and analysis , 1994 .

[64]  Ervin Bossanyi,et al.  Wind Energy Handbook , 2001 .

[65]  Limin Sun,et al.  Tuned liquid damper (TLD) for suppressing horizontal motion of structures , 1992 .

[66]  I. Enevoldsen,et al.  Effects of a vibration mass damper in a wind turbine tower , 1996 .

[67]  F. Sakai Tuned liquid column damper-new type device for suppression of building vibration , 1989 .

[68]  A. Martelli,et al.  Seismic isolation and other passive anti-seismic systems: Worldwide application and conditions for their correct use , 2011 .

[69]  N. Wongprasert,et al.  Application of a genetic algorithm for optimal damper distribution within the nonlinear seismic benchmark building , 2004 .

[70]  Hamid Reza Karimi,et al.  Semiactive vibration control of offshore wind turbine towers with tuned liquid column dampers using H∞ output feedback control , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications.

[71]  Masashi Yamamoto,et al.  Recent Applications of Structural Control Systems to High-Rise Buildings , 2003 .

[72]  B. Samali,et al.  Optimization of tuned liquid column dampers , 1997 .

[73]  Bijan Samali,et al.  Benchmark Problem for Response Control of Wind-Excited Tall Buildings , 2004 .

[74]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Passive Energy Dissipation Systems in Structural Engineering , 1997 .

[75]  Herman F. Veldkamp,et al.  Wind turbine with a vibration damper, dæmpingsanordning and method for damping oscillations in a wind turbine , 1998 .

[76]  Genda Chen,et al.  OPTIMAL PLACEMENT OF MULTIPLE TUNED MASS DAMPERS FOR SEISMIC STRUCTURES , 2001 .

[77]  Seyed Amin Mousavi,et al.  Optimum parameters of tuned liquid column–gas damper for mitigation of seismic‐induced vibrations of offshore jacket platforms , 2013 .

[78]  A·罗德里格斯楚罗克迪希安 System and method for damping vibrations in a wind turbine , 2010 .

[79]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  Mitigation of motions of tall buildings with specific examples of recent applications , 1999 .

[80]  Nestor A Agbayani A Technical Overview of ASCE/AWEA RP2011: Recommended Practice for Compliance of Large Land-based Wind Turbine Support Structures , 2014 .