Likelihood Computations Using Value Abstraction

In this paper, we use evidence-specific value abstraction for speeding Bayesian networks inference. This is done by grouping variable values and treating the combined values as a single entity. As we show, such abstractions can exploit regularities in conditional probability distributions and also the specific values of observed variables. To formally justify value abstraction, we define the notion of safe value abstraction and devise inference algorithms that use it to reduce the cost of inference. Our procedure is particularly useful for learning complex networks with many hidden variables. In such cases, repeated likelihood computations are required for EM or other parameter optimization techniques. Since these computations are repeated with respect to the same evidence set, our methods can provide significant speedup to the learning procedure. We demonstrate the algorithm on genetic linkage problems where the use of value abstraction sometimes differentiates between a feasible and non-feasible solution.

[1]  Steffen L. Lauritzen,et al.  Bayesian updating in causal probabilistic networks by local computations , 1990 .

[2]  Nevin Lianwen Zhang,et al.  On the Role of Context-Specific Independence in Probabilistic Inference , 1999, IJCAI.

[3]  G. P. Vogler,et al.  Efficient methods for computing linkage likelihoods of recessive diseases in inbred pedigrees , 1991, Genetic epidemiology.

[4]  Craig Boutilier,et al.  Context-Specific Independence in Bayesian Networks , 1996, UAI.

[5]  R. Elston,et al.  A general model for the genetic analysis of pedigree data. , 1971, Human heredity.

[6]  J. Ott Analysis of Human Genetic Linkage , 1985 .

[7]  Rina Dechter,et al.  Bucket elimination: A unifying framework for probabilistic inference , 1996, UAI.

[8]  A A Schäffer,et al.  Faster linkage analysis computations for pedigrees with loops or unused alleles. , 1996, Human heredity.

[9]  Nevin Lianwen Zhang,et al.  Exploiting Causal Independence in Bayesian Network Inference , 1996, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[10]  E. Lander,et al.  Construction of multilocus genetic linkage maps in humans. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  C. Harbron,et al.  Alternative graphical representations of genotypes in a pedigree , 1994 .

[12]  David J. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their application to expert systems , 1990 .

[13]  J. O’Connell,et al.  The VITESSE algorithm for rapid exact multilocus linkage analysis via genotype set–recoding and fuzzy inheritance , 1995, Nature Genetics.

[14]  Prakash P. Shenoy,et al.  Probability propagation , 1990, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence.

[15]  Michael P. Wellman,et al.  State-Space Abstraction for Anytime Evaluation of Probabilistic Networks , 1994, UAI.

[16]  Probability functions on complex pedigrees , 1978 .