Low latency communication infrastructure for synchrophasor applications in distribution networks

With the introduction of new power sources, such as distributed renewable energy resources, and loads, such as electric vehicles, electrical distribution networks must accommodate new energy flow patterns in a considerably dynamic environment. This leads to the need for increasing the observability of the grid to enable a series of mission-critical applications such as voltage/congestion control and fault detection/location. The deployment of Phasor Measurement Units appears to be a promising approach, offering high precision grid monitoring. However, while the low delay requirements of such applications raise a significant challenge to the communication infrastructure, there is currently no clear vision on the exact communication technologies and network topologies that could support these requirements. In this paper, we address this challenge by taking a systematic approach on the design of low latency communication infrastructures. Based on a large set of real medium voltage grid topologies from a European distribution network, we first perform a detailed analysis of the communication requirements. Guided by this analysis, we then propose two algorithms, PLeC and BW-PLeC algorithms, for the design of low latency communication infrastructures that enhance the currently available power-line communication technology with newer high-speed communication links at strategic points in the grid to satisfy the delay requirements while reducing deployment costs.

[1]  Li Wang,et al.  Feasibility study of applying LTE to Smart Grid , 2011, 2011 IEEE First International Workshop on Smart Grid Modeling and Simulation (SGMS).

[2]  R.J. Best,et al.  Differential ROCOF relay for Loss-of-Mains protection of Renewable Generation using phasor measurement over Internet Protocol , 2009, 2009 CIGRE/IEEE PES Joint Symposium Integration of Wide-Scale Renewable Resources Into the Power Delivery System.

[3]  Ning Wang,et al.  Information-centric networking for machine-to-machine data delivery: a case study in smart grid applications , 2014, IEEE Network.

[4]  George Pavlou,et al.  Supporting smart electric vehicle charging with information-centric networking , 2014, 10th International Conference on Heterogeneous Networking for Quality, Reliability, Security and Robustness.

[5]  James S. Thorp,et al.  IEEE Standard for Synchrophasors for Power Systems , 1998 .

[6]  Ragib Hasan,et al.  Analyzing NASPInet data flows , 2009, 2009 IEEE/PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition.

[7]  Mario Paolone,et al.  A Hardware-in-the-Loop Test Platform for the Real-Time State Estimation of Active Distribution Networks using Phasor Measurement Units , 2013 .

[8]  Franz Franchetti,et al.  An Information-Theoretic Approach to PMU Placement in Electric Power Systems , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[9]  Tilman Wolf,et al.  Characterizing network processing delay , 2004, IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2004. GLOBECOM '04..

[10]  Jason Brown,et al.  Performance comparison of LTE FDD and TDD based Smart Grid communications networks for uplink biased traffic , 2012, 2012 IEEE Third International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm).

[11]  G. Brunello,et al.  An overview of the IEEE Standard C37.118.2 — Synchrophasor Data Transfer for Power Systems , 2014 .

[12]  Timothy J. Lowe,et al.  Distance Constraints for Tree Network Multifacility Location Problems , 1978, Oper. Res..

[13]  Anna Scaglione,et al.  Power Line Communications and the Smart Grid , 2010, 2010 First IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications.

[14]  Jamil Y. Khan,et al.  Wide area PMU communication over a WiMAX network in the smart grid , 2012, 2012 IEEE Third International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm).

[15]  Yi Xu,et al.  A survey on the communication architectures in smart grid , 2011, Comput. Networks.