Multi‐body modelling and analysis of a planet carrier in a wind turbine gearbox

There have been some recent efforts to numerically model and analyse the wind turbine gearbox. To date, much of the focus has been on increasing model refinement and demonstrating its added value. This paper takes a step back and examines in detail the modelling and analysis of an important wind turbine gearbox component, the planet carrier, in a multi-body setting. The planet carrier studied in this work comes from the 750 kW wind turbine gearbox used in the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's Gearbox Reliability Collaborative project. The study is performed in two parts. First, the influence of subcomponents mated to the planet carrier in the gearbox assembly is investigated in detail. These components consist of the planet pins, bearings and the main shaft. In the second part of the study, the flexible body modelling of the planet carrier for use in multi-body simulations is examined through the use of condensed finite element and multi-body simulation models. Both eigenvalue analyses and time domain simulations are performed. Comparisons are made regarding the eigenfrequencies, categorized mode shapes and the maximum and minimum planet carrier rim deflections from the time domain simulations. The mode shapes are categorized into seven distinct deformation patterns. An actual load case from the dynamometer tests, a 100% rated torque loading, is used in the time domain simulations. The results from this comprehensive study provide an insight into the proper modelling of a wind turbine planet carrier in a multi-body setting. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Paul Sas,et al.  Analysis of internal drive train dynamics in a wind turbine , 2004 .

[2]  F. Oyague.  Progressive Dynamical Drive Train Modeling as Part of NREL Gearbox Reliability Collaborative (Poster) , 2008 .

[3]  Wim Desmet,et al.  Multibody modelling of varying complexity for modal behaviour analysis of wind turbine gearboxes , 2010 .

[4]  S. Dietz,et al.  Vibration and Fatigue Analysis of Vehicle Systems Using Component Modes , 1999 .

[5]  A. Q. Liu,et al.  Mixed-interface substructures for dynamic analysis of flexible multibody systems , 1996 .

[6]  M. Bampton,et al.  Coupling of substructures for dynamic analyses. , 1968 .

[7]  R. Craig,et al.  Free-interface methods of substructure coupling for dynamic analysis , 1976 .

[8]  Wim Desmet,et al.  The influence of flexibility within multibody modeling of multi-megawatt wind turbine gearboxes , 2008 .

[9]  F. Oyague,et al.  NREL Gearbox Reliability Collaborative Analysis Round Robin: Preprint , 2009 .

[10]  F. Oyague,et al.  NREL Gearbox Reliability Collaborative Experimental Data Overview and Analysis: Preprint , 2010 .

[11]  F. Oyague.  Progressive Dynamical Drive Train Modeling as Part of NREL Gearbox Reliability Collaborative: Preprint , 2008 .

[12]  F. Oyague.  Gearbox Modeling and Load Simulation of a Baseline 750-kW Wind Turbine Using State-of-the-Art Simulation Codes , 2009 .

[13]  R. Guyan.  Reduction of stiffness and mass matrices , 1965 .

[14]  W. LaCava,et al.  Gearbox Reliability Collaborative Project Report: Findings from Phase 1 and Phase 2 Testing , 2011 .

[15]  Andreas Heckmann,et al.  On the choice of boundary conditions for mode shapes in flexible multibody systems , 2010 .

[16]  Simon Wiedemann,et al.  Comparison of Results in Flexible Multibody Dynamics Using Various Approaches , 2003 .

[17]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  An inertia-capacitance beam substructure formulation based on the bond graph method with application to rotating beams , 2011 .

[18]  Wim Desmet,et al.  Optimized inclusion of flexibility in wind turbine gearbox multibody model in view of model updating on dynamic test rig , 2010 .

[19]  Wim Desmet,et al.  Interface reduction of flexible bodies for efficient modeling of body flexibility in multibody dynamics , 2010 .

[20]  Ahmed A. Shabana,et al.  Flexible Multibody Simulation and Choice of Shape Functions , 1999 .

[21]  Jaume Betran,et al.  Fatigue load computation of wind turbine gearboxes by coupled finite element, multi‐body system and aerodynamic analysis , 2007 .

[22]  Wim Desmet,et al.  Insights in wind turbine drive train dynamics gathered by validating advanced models on a newly developed 13.2 MW dynamically controlled test-rig , 2011 .

[23]  F. Oyague,et al.  Gearbox Reliability Collaborative (GRC) Description and Loading , 2011 .

[24]  Paul Sas,et al.  Flexible multibody model of a three-stage planetary gearbox in a wind turbine , 2004 .