Contextual effects in fine spatial discriminations.

The context in which a pattern is viewed can greatly affect its apparent contrast, a phenomenon commonly attributed to pooled contrast gain control processes. A low-contrast surround may slightly enhance apparent contrast, whereas increasing the contrast of the surround leads to a monotonic decline in contrast appearance. We ask here how the presence of a patterned surround affects the ability to perform fine, suprathreshold orientation, contrast, and spatial frequency discriminations as a function of surround contrast and phase. Our results revealed an unexpected dip in performance when center and surround were in phase and similar in contrast. These results suggest that additional processes, perhaps those involved in scene segregation, play a role in contextual effects on discrimination.

[1]  T. Meese,et al.  Adaptation and gain pool summation: alternative models and masking data , 2002, Vision Research.

[2]  R. Shapley,et al.  Contextual influences on orientation discrimination: binding local and global cues , 2001, Vision Research.

[3]  Khanh Nguyen,et al.  Use of a raster framebuffer in vision research , 1986 .

[4]  A. B. Bonds.  Role of Inhibition in the Specification of Orientation Selectivity of Cells in the Cat Striate Cortex , 1989, Visual Neuroscience.

[5]  Isabelle Mareschal,et al.  Effects of contrast and size on orientation discrimination , 2004, Vision Research.

[6]  L. Maffei,et al.  Intra-cortical inhibition prevents simple cells from responding to textured visual patterns , 1981, Behavioural Brain Research.

[7]  J. Movshon,et al.  Selectivity for orientation and direction of motion of single neurons in cat striate and extrastriate visual cortex. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  R. Snowden,et al.  The effects of surround contrast on contrast thresholds, perceived contrast and contrast discrimination , 1998, Vision Research.

[9]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  The effects of contrast on visual orientation and spatial frequency discrimination: a comparison of single cells and behavior. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Asymmetric Suppression Outside the Classical Receptive Field of the Visual Cortex , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Surround modulation in human vision unmasked by masking experiments , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  A. B. Bonds,et al.  Dynamic differentiation of GABAA-sensitive influences on orientation selectivity of complex cells in the cat striate cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  Y. Sugita,et al.  Cortical modulation of visual contrast , 1991, Psychological research.

[14]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Striate cortex of monkey and cat: contrast response function. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  M. Cannon,et al.  A model for inhibitory lateral interaction effects in perceived contrast , 1996, Vision Research.

[16]  C. Koch,et al.  Flanker effects in peripheral contrast discrimination—psychophysics and modeling , 2001, Vision Research.

[17]  U. Polat.  Functional architecture of long-range perceptual interactions. , 1999, Spatial vision.

[18]  A. B. Bonds,et al.  Inhibitory refinement of spatial frequency selectivity in single cells of the cat striate cortex , 1991, Vision Research.

[19]  D. Heeger.  Half-squaring in responses of cat striate cells , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[20]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Spatial contrast adaptation characteristics of neurones recorded in the cat's visual cortex. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  A. B. Bonds,et al.  Contrast adaptation in cat visual cortex is not mediated by GABA , 1986, Brain Research.

[22]  M. Morgan,et al.  Facilitation from collinear flanks is cancelled by non-collinear flanks , 2000, Vision Research.

[23]  A. B. Bonds,et al.  From another angle: Differences in cortical coding between fine and coarse discrimination of orientation. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  S. F. Bowne.  Contrast discrimination cannot explain spatial frequency, orientation or temporal frequency discrimination , 1990, Vision Research.

[25]  C. Tyler,et al.  Lateral sensitivity modulation explains the flanker effect in contrast discrimination , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  Isabelle Mareschal,et al.  A psychophysical correlate of contrast dependent changes in receptive field properties , 2002, Vision Research.

[27]  U. Polat,et al.  Lateral interactions between spatial channels: Suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking experiments , 1993, Vision Research.

[28]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Suppression outside the classical cortical receptive field , 2000, Visual Neuroscience.

[29]  David C. Burr,et al.  Local regulation of luminance gain , 1985, Vision Research.

[30]  G. Sperling,et al.  The lateral inhibition of perceived contrast is indifferent to on-center/off-center segregation, but specific to orientation , 1993, Vision Research.

[31]  C Chubb,et al.  Second-order processes in vision: introduction. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[32]  J. B. Levitt,et al.  Contrast dependence of contextual effects in primate visual cortex , 1997, nature.

[33]  Lynn A. Olzak,et al.  When orthogonal orientations are not processed independently , 1991, Vision Research.

[34]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Motion selectivity and the contrast-response function of simple cells in the visual cortex , 1991, Visual Neuroscience.

[35]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Organization of suppression in receptive fields of neurons in cat visual cortex. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Linear and nonlinear contributions to orientation tuning of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex , 1999, Visual Neuroscience.

[37]  J. P. Thomas,et al.  Dual nonlinearities regulate contrast sensitivity in pattern discrimination tasks , 2003, Vision Research.

[38]  S. Klein,et al.  Cross- and iso- oriented surrounds modulate the contrast response function: the effect of surround contrast. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[39]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Length and width tuning of neurons in the cat's primary visual cortex. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  A. B. Bonds,et al.  Anticholinesterase agents affect contrast gain of the cat cortical visual evoked potential , 1986, Neuroscience Letters.

[41]  Mark W. Cannon,et al.  Spatial interactions in apparent contrast: Inhibitory effects among grating patterns of different spatial frequencies, spatial positions and orientations , 1991, Vision Research.

[42]  Mark W. Cannon,et al.  Spatial interactions in apparent contrast: Individual differences in enhancement and suppression effects , 1993, Vision Research.

[43]  Spatial phase sensitivity of mechanisms mediating discrimination of small orientation differences. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[44]  D. Heeger,et al.  Measurement and modeling of center-surround suppression and enhancement , 2001, Vision Research.

[45]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Pattern detection in the presence of maskers that differ in spatial phase and temporal offset: threshold measurements and a model , 1999, Vision Research.

[46]  Lynn A. Olzak,et al.  Configural effects constrain fourier models of pattern discrimination , 1992, Vision Research.

[47]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Interactions between spatial frequency channels , 1978, Vision Research.

[48]  Yoshimichi Ejima,et al.  Apparent contrast of a sinusoidal grating in the simultaneous presence of peripheral gratings , 1985, Vision Research.

[49]  U. Polat,et al.  Neurophysiological Evidence for Contrast Dependent Long-range Facilitation and Suppression in the Human Visual Cortex , 1996, Vision Research.

[50]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Human luminance pattern-vision mechanisms: masking experiments require a new model. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[51]  D. Heeger.  Modeling simple-cell direction selectivity with normalized, half-squared, linear operators. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[52]  Lynn A Olzak,et al.  Multiple gain control processes in contrast–contrast phenomena , 1999, Vision Research.

[53]  U. Polat,et al.  Collinear stimuli regulate visual responses depending on cell's contrast threshold , 1998, Nature.

[54]  Visual sensitivity in the presence of a patterned background. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[55]  J P Thomas,et al.  Underlying psychometric function for detecting gratings and identifying spatial frequency. , 1983, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[56]  A. B. Bonds,et al.  The influence of input from the lower cortical layers on the orientation tuning of upper layer V1 cells in a primate , 1995, Visual Neuroscience.

[57]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Functional Micro-Organization of Primary Visual Cortex: Receptive Field Analysis of Nearby Neurons , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[58]  J. P. Thomas,et al.  Contrast gain control and fine spatial discriminations. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[59]  J. P. Thomas,et al.  Why are some spatial discriminations independent of contrast? , 1989, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[60]  A. B. Bonds.  Temporal dynamics of contrast gain in single cells of the cat striate cortex , 1991, Visual Neuroscience.

[61]  M. D'Zmura,et al.  Spatial pooling of contrast in contrast gain control. , 1996, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[62]  D. Sagi,et al.  Effects of spatial configuration on contrast detection , 1998, Vision Research.

[63]  J. P. Thomas,et al.  Neural recoding in human pattern vision: model and mechanisms , 1999, Vision Research.