“Switching On” creativity: Task switching can increase creativity by reducing cognitive fixation

Whereas past research has focused on the downsides of task switching, the present research uncovers a potential upside: increased creativity. In two experiments, we show that task switching can enhance two principal forms of creativity—divergent thinking (Study 1) and convergent thinking (Study 2)—in part because temporarily setting a task aside reduces cognitive fixation. Participants who continually alternated back and forth between two creativity tasks outperformed both participants who switched between the tasks at their discretion and participants who attempted one task for the first half of the allotted time before switching to the other task for the second half. Importantly, Studies 3a–3d reveal that people overwhelmingly fail to adopt a continual-switch approach when incentivized to choose a task switching strategy that would maximize their creative performance. These findings provide insights into how individuals can “switch on” creativity when navigating multiple creative tasks.

[1]  Jing Zhou,et al.  Research on Workplace Creativity: A Review and Redirection , 2014 .

[2]  Jing Zhou.  Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation: Interactive effects on creative performance. , 1998 .

[3]  Sophie Leroy.  Why is it so hard to do my work? The challenge of attention residue when switching between work tasks , 2009 .

[4]  S. Mednick.  The associative basis of the creative process. , 1962, Psychological review.

[5]  Marla M. Capozzi.  Leadership and Innovation , 2010 .

[6]  Shalini Khazanchi,et al.  The relationship between stressors and creativity: a meta-analysis examining competing theoretical models. , 2010, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  Wolfgang Stroebe,et al.  The selection of creative ideas after individual idea generation: choosing between creativity and impact. , 2010, British journal of psychology.

[8]  Nicholas W. Kohn,et al.  Collaborative fixation: effects of others' ideas on brainstorming , 2011 .

[9]  Vincent R. Brown,et al.  Enhancing ideational creativity in groups: Lessons from research on brainstorming. , 2003 .

[10]  E. Hallowell,et al.  Overloaded circuits: why smart people underperform. , 2005, Harvard business review.

[11]  John Baer.  The Case for Domain Specificity of Creativity , 1998 .

[12]  R. Weisberg,et al.  Following the wrong footsteps: fixation effects of pictorial examples in a design problem-solving task. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Incubation and the persistence of fixation in problem solving. , 1991, The American journal of psychology.

[14]  S. Iyengar,et al.  Empowerment through Choice? A Critical Analysis of the Effects of Choice in Organizations , 2006 .

[15]  J. Guilford,et al.  The nature of human intelligence. , 1968 .

[16]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Cognitive control in media multitaskers , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Ricky W. Griffin,et al.  Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity , 1993 .

[18]  Matthijs Baas,et al.  The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence , 2010 .

[19]  John S. Gero,et al.  Design and other types of fixation , 1996 .

[20]  Steven M. Smith.  Fixation, incubation, and insight in memory and creative thinking. , 1995 .

[21]  Francesca Gino,et al.  Evil Genius? How Dishonesty Can Lead to Greater Creativity , 2014, Psychological science.

[22]  T. M. Amabile.  The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. , 1983 .

[23]  Andrea Prat,et al.  Span of Control and Span of Attention , 2014 .

[24]  Mark W. Becker,et al.  Media Multitasking Is Associated with Symptoms of Depression and Social Anxiety , 2013, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[25]  Christina E. Shalley,et al.  Multiple Tasks' and Multiple Goals' Effect on Creativity: Forced Incubation or Just a Distraction? , 2008 .

[26]  J. George,et al.  Work Interrupted: A Closer Look at the Role of Interruptions in Organizational Life , 2003 .

[27]  C. Shalley,et al.  The Effects of Personal and Contextual Characteristics on Creativity: Where Should We Go from Here? , 2004 .

[28]  S. Monsell,et al.  Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. , 1995 .

[29]  F. Gino,et al.  The Dark Side of Going Abroad: How Broad Foreign Experiences Increase Immoral Behavior , 2017, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  A. Galinsky,et al.  Getting the most out of living abroad: biculturalism and integrative complexity as key drivers of creative and professional success. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  Genna Angello,et al.  Overcoming Fixation , 2010, Psychological science.

[32]  Sheena S. Iyengar,et al.  Creativity as a Matter of Choice: Prior Experience and Task Instruction as Boundary Conditions for the Positive Effect of Choice on Creativity , 2008 .

[33]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. , 1977 .

[34]  L. Perlow.  The Time Famine: Toward a Sociology of Work Time , 1999 .

[35]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[36]  C. Shalley,et al.  WHAT LEADERS NEED TO KNOW: A REVIEW OF SOCIAL AND CONTEXTUAL FACTORS THAT CAN FOSTER OR HINDER CREATIVITY , 2004 .

[37]  A. Luchins.  Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of Einstellung. , 1942 .

[38]  A. Dijksterhuis,et al.  Where creativity resides: The generative power of unconscious thought , 2006, Consciousness and Cognition.

[39]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[40]  Martin L. Bink,et al.  Breaks and task switches in prospective memory , 2006 .

[41]  A. Luchins,et al.  Rigidity of behavior : a variational approach to the effect of Einstellung , 1961 .

[42]  John T. Willse,et al.  Assessing Creativity With Divergent Thinking Tasks: Exploring the Reliability and Validity of New Subjective Scoring Methods , 2008 .

[43]  Geri Gay,et al.  The laptop and the lecture: The effects of multitasking in learning environments , 2003, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[44]  Roni Brown,et al.  Before the Gates of Excellence: The Determinants of Creative Genius , 1991 .

[45]  W. Ocasio.  TOWARDS AN ATTENTION-BASED VIEW OF THE FIRM , 1997 .

[46]  Ut Na Sio,et al.  Does incubation enhance problem solving? A meta-analytic review. , 2009, Psychological bulletin.

[47]  Deborah A. Boehm-Davis,et al.  Do Interruptions Affect Quality of Work? , 2014, Hum. Factors.

[48]  Steven M. Smith.  The constraining effects of initial ideas. , 2003 .

[49]  Jing Zhou,et al.  Enhancing Creative Performance: Effects of Expected Developmental Assessment Strategies and Creative Personality , 2001 .

[50]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[51]  G. R. Oldham,et al.  The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[52]  Shalini Khazanchi,et al.  Rewards and creative performance: a meta-analytic test of theoretically derived hypotheses. , 2012, Psychological bulletin.

[53]  U. Foehr.  MEDIA MULTITASKING AMONG AMERICAN YOUTH: PREVALENCE, PREDICTORS AND PAIRINGS , 2006 .

[54]  Jack A. Goncalo,et al.  Are Two Narcissists Better Than One? The Link Between Narcissism, Perceived Creativity, and Creative Performance , 2010, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[55]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Alternating Incubation Effects in the Generation of Category Exemplars , 2017 .

[56]  Trina C. Kershaw,et al.  Multiple causes of difficulty in insight: the case of the nine-dot problem. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[57]  Michael D. Buhrmester,et al.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[58]  N. Maier.  Reasoning in humans. I. On direction. , 1930 .

[59]  Ellen F. Greenberg,et al.  Creativity, autonomy, and evaluation of creative work: Artistic workers in organizations. , 1992 .

[60]  T. M. Amabile.  Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. , 1982 .

[61]  Catherine M Arrington,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article The Cost of a Voluntary Task Switch , 2022 .

[62]  F. Durso,et al.  Graph-Theoretic Confirmation of Restructuring During Insight , 1994 .

[63]  J. Smallwood,et al.  Inspired by Distraction , 2012, Psychological science.

[64]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Forgetting of intentions in demanding situations is rapid. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[65]  R. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[66]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[67]  Brian J. Lucas,et al.  People underestimate the value of persistence for creative performance. , 2015, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[68]  K. Duncker,et al.  On problem-solving , 1945 .

[69]  H. Barkema,et al.  Fostering team creativity: perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity's potential. , 2010, The Journal of applied psychology.