Insights into the Adhesive Mechanisms of Tree Frogs using Artificial Mimics

Elastic, microstructured surfaces (hydrophobic and hydrophilic) mimicking the surface structure of tree-frog toe-pads are fabricated. Their adhesion and friction behaviour in the presence of a liquid layer is evaluated and compared to flat controls. Tree-frog-like patterns are beneficial for wet adhesion only if the liquid does not wet the surface. The situation is different in friction, where the surface structure lead to significantly higher friction forces only if the liquid does wet the surface. Taking into account that tree-frog attachment pads are hydrophilic and that their secretion wets all kind of surfaces, our results indicate that the surface structure in tree-frog toe-pads has been developed for climbing, when shear (friction) forces are involved. These results evidence the benefits and limitations of the surface design (microstructure and hydrophilicity) for adhesion and friction under wet conditions.

[1]  S. Gorb,et al.  Hexagonal Surface Micropattern for Dry and Wet Friction , 2009 .

[2]  S. Gorb,et al.  From micro to nano contacts in biological attachment devices , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  J. Sáenz,et al.  Nanogeometry matters: unexpected decrease of capillary adhesion forces with increasing relative humidity. , 2010, Small.

[4]  K. Kendall,et al.  Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids , 1971, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[5]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  Elastic modulus of tree frog adhesive toe pads , 2011, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[6]  Hans-Jürgen Butt,et al.  Surface and Interfacial Forces: BUTT:SURFACE FORCES O-BK , 2010 .

[7]  J. A. Greenwood,et al.  The mechanics of adhesion of viscoelastic solids , 1981 .

[8]  Eduard Arzt,et al.  Patterned Surfaces with Pillars with Controlled 3D Tip Geometry Mimicking Bioattachment Devices , 2007 .

[9]  W. Barnes,et al.  Capillary forces between soft, elastic spheres , 2010 .

[10]  Eduard Arzt,et al.  Adhesion of bioinspired micropatterned surfaces: effects of pillar radius, aspect ratio, and preload. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[11]  W. Barnes,et al.  Adhesion and Detachment of the Toe Pads of Tree Frogs , 1991 .

[12]  J. Schaefer,et al.  Dynamic Contact Model Based on Meniscus Adhesion For Wet Bio-Adhesive Pads: Simulation Experiments , 2010 .

[13]  Xiangjun Zhang,et al.  Controllable and switchable capillary adhesion mechanism for bio-adhesive pads: Effect of micro patterns , 2009 .

[14]  Hongbo Zeng,et al.  Role of tilted adhesion fibrils (setae) in the adhesion and locomotion of gecko-like systems. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[15]  Eduard Arzt,et al.  Contact shape controls adhesion of bioinspired fibrillar surfaces. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[16]  Graeme D. Ruxton,et al.  Structural correlates of increased adhesive efficiency with adult size in the toe pads of hylid tree frogs , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[17]  S. Gorb,et al.  Shearing of fibrillar adhesive microstructure: friction and shear-related changes in pull-off force , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[18]  Luciano F Boesel,et al.  Bioinspired Actuated Adhesive Patterns of Liquid Crystalline Elastomers , 2012, Advanced materials.

[19]  Mechanical tuning of adhesion through micro-patterning of elastic surfaces , 2010, 1009.5193.

[20]  Shravanthi T. Reddy,et al.  Bioinspired Surfaces with Switchable Adhesion , 2007 .

[21]  C Mohrdieck,et al.  Enhancement of capillary forces by multiple liquid bridges. , 2008, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[22]  A. del Campo,et al.  3D Microstructured Surfaces Obtained by Soft‐Lithography Using Fast‐Crosslinking Elastomeric Precursors and 2D Masters , 2007 .

[23]  L. Léger,et al.  Adhesion mechanisms at soft polymer interfaces , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[24]  Hans-Jürgen Butt,et al.  Normal capillary forces. , 2009, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[25]  L. Léger,et al.  Adhesion at the Solid-Elastomer Interface: Influence of the Interfacial Chains , 1995 .

[26]  C. Greiner,et al.  SU-8: a photoresist for high-aspect-ratio and 3D submicron lithography , 2007 .

[27]  W. Barnes.  Functional Morphology and Design Constraints of Smooth Adhesive Pads , 2007 .

[28]  Werner Baumgartner,et al.  Ultrastructure and physical properties of an adhesive surface, the toe pad epithelium of the tree frog, Litoria caerulea White , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[29]  Eduard Arzt,et al.  Gecko‐Inspired Surfaces: A Path to Strong and Reversible Dry Adhesives , 2010, Advanced materials.

[30]  S. Gorb,et al.  A beetle-inspired solution for underwater adhesion , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[31]  Metin Sitti,et al.  Adhesion of Biologically Inspired Oil-Coated Polymer Micropillars , 2008 .

[32]  W. Barnes,et al.  Wet but not slippery: boundary friction in tree frog adhesive toe pads , 2006, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[33]  Walter Federle,et al.  Biomechanics of smooth adhesive pads in insects: influence of tarsal secretion on attachment performance , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[34]  S. Emerson,et al.  Toe pad morphology and mechanisms of sticking in frogs , 1980 .

[35]  W. Barnes,et al.  Whole animal measurements of shear and adhesive forces in adult tree frogs: insights into underlying mechanisms of adhesion obtained from studying the effects of size and scale , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[36]  Kellar Autumn,et al.  Properties, Principles, and Parameters of the Gecko Adhesive System , 2006 .