Comparison of Constrained Parameterisation Strategies for Aerodynamic Optimisation of Morphing Leading Edge Airfoil

In the context of ambitious targets for reducing environmental impact in the aviation sector, dictated by international institutions, morphing aircraft are expected to have potential for achieving the required efficiency increases. However, there are still open issues related to the design and implementation of deformable structures. In this paper, we compare three constrained parameterisation strategies for the aerodynamic design of a morphing leading edge, representing a potential substitute for traditional high-lift systems. In order to facilitate the structural design and promote the feasibility of solutions, we solve a multi-objective optimisation problem, including constraints on axial and bending strain introduced by morphing. A parameterisation method, inherently producing constant arc length curves, is employed in three variants, representing different morphing strategies which provide an increasing level of deformability, by allowing the lower edge of the flexible skin to slide and the gap formed with the fixed spar to be closed by a hatch. The results for the optimisation of a baseline airfoil show that the geometric constraints are effectively handled in the optimisation and the solutions are smooth, with a continuous variation along the Pareto frontier. The larger shape modification allowed by more flexible parameterisation variants enables an increase of the maximum lift coefficient up to 8.35%, and efficiency at 70% of stall incidence up to 4.26%.

[1]  Hans Peter Monner,et al.  LOW SPEED WIND TUNNEL TEST OF A MORPHING LEADING EDGE , 2013 .

[2]  Ernesto Benini,et al.  A Simplex Crossover based evolutionary algorithm including the genetic diversity as objective , 2013, Appl. Soft Comput..

[3]  Radhakrishna Bettadapura,et al.  Length-Constrained Bézier Curve Smoothing , 2013 .

[4]  Alessandro Airoldi,et al.  Design of a Leading Edge Morphing Based on Compliant Structures in the Framework of the CS2-AIRGREEN2 Project , 2018 .

[5]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Design of a transonic wing with an adaptive morphing trailing edge via aerostructural optimization , 2018, Aerospace Science and Technology.

[6]  M. Drela XFOIL: An Analysis and Design System for Low Reynolds Number Airfoils , 1989 .

[7]  Giovanni Venturelli,et al.  Comparison between Pure and Surrogate-assisted Evolutionary Algorithms for Multiobjective Optimization , 2015, FSDM.

[8]  Ernesto Benini,et al.  Aerodynamic Optimization of a Morphing Leading Edge Airfoil with a Constant Arc Length Parameterization , 2018 .

[9]  Melissa L. Rethlefsen,et al.  2050 , 2017, Journal of Clinical and Translational Science.

[10]  B. Kulfan Universal Parametric Geometry Representation Method , 2008 .

[11]  Rafic M. Ajaj,et al.  Morphing aircraft: the need for a new design philosophy , 2016 .

[12]  Hugues Remy,et al.  Landing Gears and High Lift Devices Airframe Noise Research , 2002 .

[13]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of an Adaptive Morphing Trailing-Edge Wing , 2015 .

[14]  Sergio Ricci,et al.  Knowledge-Based Shape Optimization of Morphing Wing for More Efficient Aircraft , 2015 .

[15]  Manfred Morari,et al.  Aero-Structural Optimization of Morphing Airfoils for Adaptive Wings , 2011 .

[16]  Sergio Ricci,et al.  Design, Manufacturing and Wind Tunnel Validation of an Active Camber Morphing Wing Based on Compliant Structures , 2014 .

[17]  Salvatore Ameduri Morphing of the Leading Edge , 2018 .

[18]  Roeland De Breuker,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of the Morphing Leading Edge Concept , 2015 .

[19]  F. R. Menter,et al.  Transition Modelling for General Purpose CFD Codes , 2006 .

[20]  Hans Peter Monner,et al.  DESIGN OF A SMART LEADING EDGE DEVICE FOR LOW SPEED WIND TUNNEL TESTS IN THE EUROPEAN PROJECT SADE , 2011 .

[21]  F. Menter Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[22]  Jochen Wild Recent research topics in high-lift aerodynamics , 2016 .

[23]  Ruxandra Botez,et al.  Optimization of an Unmanned Aerial System' Wing Using a Flexible Skin Morphing Wing , 2013 .

[24]  S. Du,et al.  Design and Feasibility Analyses of Morphing Airfoil Used to Control Flight Attitude , 2012 .

[25]  Michael I. Friswell,et al.  Aerodynamic optimisation of a camber morphing aerofoil , 2015 .

[26]  Shijun Guo,et al.  A review of modelling and analysis of morphing wings , 2018, Progress in Aerospace Sciences.

[27]  Chen Zhou,et al.  Multidisciplinary design optimization of adaptive wing leading edge , 2013 .

[28]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  A Review of Morphing Aircraft , 2011 .

[29]  Michael I. Friswell,et al.  Multi-objective geometry optimization of the Fish Bone Active Camber morphing airfoil , 2016 .

[30]  Kenichi Rinoie,et al.  Laminar airfoil modification attaining optimum drag reduction by use of airfoil morphing , 2010 .

[31]  F. Menter,et al.  A One-Equation Local Correlation-Based Transition Model , 2015 .

[32]  Johannes Kirn,et al.  Kinematic Solution for a highly adaptive Droop Nose , 2014 .

[33]  Forrester T. Johnson,et al.  Modi cations and Clari cations for the Implementation of the Spalart-Allmaras Turbulence Model , 2011 .

[34]  A. Strauß Theory Of Wing Sections Including A Summary Of Airfoil Data , 2016 .

[35]  Afzal Suleman,et al.  Design of a Morphing Airfoil Using Aerodynamic Shape Optimization , 2006 .