Impact of residential customer classification on demand response results under high renewable penetration

The large scale deployment of renewable generation is generally seen as the most promising option for displacing fossil fuel generators, especially coal-fired power plants. A key challenge in integrating Renewable Energy Resources (RERs) is to find approaches that ensure long term sustainability and economic profit. The appropriate design of Demand Response (DR) could control both the increase in peak demand and volatility of prices. An essential part of good DR design, especially in the residential sector, is understanding diverse customer behavior. In this paper, an Incentive Based Demand Response (IBDR) is proposed segregating the elasticity of household appliances. The proposed elasticity approach provides a more accurate model of both the load shift and load reduction potential in the residential sector. Customer classification is explored to understand the diversity of customer behavior. In the presented case study, the retirement of seven coal-fired power plants and expansion of RERs is simulated using data from the reduced WECC 240-bus system. Results show although renewable expansion could lead to benefit loss for utilities and abrupt changes in market prices, the proposed IBDR program could minimize such impacts.

[2]  Joan L. Luft,et al.  Bonus and penalty incentives contract choice by employees , 1994 .

[3]  Kevin J. Murphy,et al.  Compensation and Incentives: Practice vs. Theory , 1988 .

[4]  A. Tabeau,et al.  OECD environmental outlook to 2050 : the consequences of inaction , 2012 .

[5]  Ailin Asadinejad Electricity Market Designs for Demand Response from Residential Customers , 2017 .

[6]  J. W. Marangon Lima,et al.  Estimation of electricity elasticity for demand rates and load curve in Brazil , 2010, IEEE PES General Meeting.

[7]  J. L. Azcona,et al.  Estimation of Elasticity Price of Electricity with Incomplete Information , 2009 .

[8]  Tao Chen,et al.  Consensus-based distributed control for economic operation of distribution grid with multiple consumers and prosumers , 2016, 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM).

[9]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation: Methodology , 2011 .

[10]  D. T. Nguyen,et al.  Pool-Based Demand Response Exchange—Concept and Modeling , 2011 .

[11]  Salman Mohagheghi,et al.  Demand Response Architecture: Integration into the Distribution Management System , 2010, 2010 First IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications.

[12]  Danièle Revel,et al.  IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation , 2011 .

[13]  Morteza Dabbaghjamanesh,et al.  An Optimization Technique Based on Profit of Investment and Market Clearing in Wind Power Systems , 2016 .

[14]  Amin Khodaei,et al.  Application of microgrids in addressing distribution network net-load ramping , 2016, 2016 IEEE Power & Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT).

[15]  Kevin Tomsovic,et al.  Residential customers elasticity estimation and clustering based on their contribution at incentive based demand response , 2016, 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM).

[16]  S. Pachauri,et al.  Elasticities of electricity demand in urban Indian households , 2004 .

[17]  Kevin Tomsovic,et al.  Examination of incentive based demand response in western connection reduced model , 2015, 2015 North American Power Symposium (NAPS).

[18]  Seyed Hossein Hosseinian,et al.  Distributed cooperative control system for smart microgrids , 2016 .

[19]  James E. Price,et al.  Reduced network modeling of WECC as a market design prototype , 2011, 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[20]  S. Mehraeen,et al.  Micro Grid Stability Improvements by Employing Storage , 2013, 2013 IEEE Green Technologies Conference (GreenTech).