Assessment of reproducibility and stability of different breath-hold maneuvres by dynamic MRI: comparison between healthy adults and patients with pulmonary hypertension

To assess the stability and reproducibility of different breath-hold levels in healthy volunteers and patients using dynamic MRI (dMRI). In ten healthy volunteers and ten patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) and normal lung function craniocaudal intrathoracic distances (CCD) were measured during inspiratory and expiratory breath-hold (15 s) (in healthy volunteers additionally at a self-chosen mid-inspiratory breath-hold) using dMRI (trueFISP, three images/s). To evaluate stability and intraobserver reproducibility of the different breath-hold levels, CCDs, time-distance curves, confidence intervals (CIs), Mann-Witney U test and regression equations were calculated. In healthy volunteers there was a substantial decrease of the CCD during the inspiratory breath-hold in contrast to the expiratory breath-hold. The CI at inspiration was 2.84±1.28 in the right and 2.1±0.68 in the left hemithorax. At expiration the CI was 2.54±1.18 and 2.8±1.48. Patients were significantly less able to hold their breath at inspiration than controls (P<0.05). In patients CI was 4.53±4.06 and 3.46±2.21 at inspiration and 4.45±4.23 and 4.76±3.73 at expiration. Intraobserver variability showed no significant differences either in patients or in healthy subjects. Reproducibility was significantly lower at a self-chosen breath-hold level of the healthy volunteers. DMRI is able to differentiate stability and reproducibility of different breath-hold levels. Expiratory breath-hold proved to be more stable than inspiratory breath-hold in healthy volunteers and patients.

[1]  L. Houser,et al.  Relief of distress of breathholding: separate effects of expiration and inspiration. , 1995, Respiration physiology.

[2]  Wesley L. Tseng A new charge pumping method of measuring Si‐SiO2 interface states , 1987 .

[3]  A. Howseman,et al.  Estimation of lung volume in infants by echo planar imaging and total body plethysmography. , 1990, Archives of disease in childhood.

[4]  Hans-Ulrich Kauczor,et al.  Comparison of relative forced expiratory volume of one second with dynamic magnetic resonance imaging parameters in healthy subjects and patients with lung cancer , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  T Kondo,et al.  A dynamic analysis of chest wall motions with MRI in healthy young subjects * , 2000, Respirology.

[6]  M. Heike,et al.  Prospektive Machbarkeitsstudie zum Vergleich von Röntgenübersichtsaufnahme und Thorax-MRT in Atemanhaltetechnik am offenen Niederfeldgerät , 2002 .

[7]  H. Kauczor,et al.  Focal airtrapping at expiratory high-resolution CT: comparison with pulmonary function tests , 2000, European Radiology.

[8]  J. Sharp,et al.  Relative contributions of rib cage and abdomen to breathing in normal subjects. , 1977, Journal of applied physiology.

[9]  J. Verschakelen,et al.  Diaphragmatic displacement measured by fluoroscopy and derived by Respitrace. , 1989, Journal of applied physiology.

[10]  X. Baur,et al.  Comparison of lung-function reference values , 1999, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[11]  Hans-Ulrich Kauczor,et al.  Analysis of intrathoracic tumor mobility during whole breathing cycle by dynamic MRI. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  A. Bankier,et al.  Effect of lung inflation on arterial spin labeling signal in MR perfusion imaging of human lung , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  Hans-Ulrich Kauczor,et al.  Measurement of tumor diameter-dependent mobility of lung tumors by dynamic MRI. , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[14]  K. Esato,et al.  Impaired respiratory mechanics in pulmonary emphysema: Evaluation with dynamic breathing MRI , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  E A Hoffman,et al.  Quantification of thoracic volumes by three-dimensional imaging. , 1987, Journal of applied physiology.

[16]  T. Matsumoto,et al.  Paired inspiratory–expiratory thin-section CT findings in patients with small airway disease , 2001, European Radiology.

[17]  V. Napadow,et al.  Determination of regional pulmonary parenchymal strain during normal respiration using spin inversion tagged magnetization MRI , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  Hans-Ulrich Kauczor,et al.  Measurement of diaphragmatic length during the breathing cycle by dynamic MRI: comparison between healthy adults and patients with an intrathoracic tumor , 2004, European Radiology.

[19]  A. Torbicki,et al.  Diagnosis and differential assessment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  D. O’Donnell,et al.  Effect of salmeterol on the ventilatory response to exercise in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease , 2004, European Respiratory Journal.

[21]  S. Erickson,et al.  Diaphragmatic motion: fast gradient-recalled-echo MR imaging in healthy subjects. , 1995, Radiology.

[22]  P. Grenier,et al.  Diaphragm and chest wall: assessment of the inspiratory pump with MR imaging-preliminary observations. , 2000, Radiology.

[23]  M Paiva,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of the in vivo human diaphragm shape at different lung volumes. , 1994, Journal of applied physiology.

[24]  Hans-Ulrich Kauczor,et al.  Evaluation of Chest Motion and Volumetry During the Breathing Cycle by Dynamic MRI in Healthy Subjects: Comparison With Pulmonary Function Tests , 2004, Investigative radiology.