Strings: Variational Deformable Models of Multivariate Continuous Boundary Features

We propose a new image segmentation technique called strings. A string is a variational deformable model that is learned from a collection of example objects rather than built from a priori analytical or geometrical knowledge. As opposed to existing approaches, an object boundary is represented by a one-dimensional multivariate curve in functional space, a feature function, rather than by a point in vector space. In the learning phase, feature functions are defined by extraction of multiple shape and image features along continuous object boundaries in a given learning set. The feature functions are aligned, then subjected to functional principal components analysis and functional principal regression to summarize the feature space and to model its content, respectively. Also, a Mahalanobis distance model is constructed for evaluation of boundaries in terms of their feature functions, taking into account the natural variations seen in the learning set. In the segmentation phase, an object boundary in a new image is searched for with help of a curve. The curve gives rise to a feature function, a string, that is weighted by the regression model and evaluated by the Mahalanobis model. The curve is deformed in an iterative procedure to produce feature functions with minimal Mahalanobis distance. Strings have been compared with active shape models on 145 vertebra images, showing that strings produce better results when initialized close to the target boundary, and comparable results otherwise.

[1]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  A minimum description length approach to statistical shape modeling , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  John R. Kender,et al.  Sectored Snakes: Evaluating Learned-Energy Segmentations , 2001, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[3]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[4]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Building and using flexible models incorporating grey-level information , 1993, 1993 (4th) International Conference on Computer Vision.

[5]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  A Probabilistic Fitness Measure for Deformable Template Models , 1994, BMVC.

[6]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Statistical models of face images - improving specificity , 1998, Image Vis. Comput..

[7]  J T Massey,et al.  Plan and operation of the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1976-1980. , 1981, Vital and health statistics. Ser. 1, Programs and collection procedures.

[8]  Christopher J. Taylor,et al.  Automatic construction of eigenshape models by direct optimization , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[9]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Combining point distribution models with shape models based on finite element analysis , 1994, Image Vis. Comput..

[10]  Olivier D. Faugeras,et al.  Statistical shape influence in geodesic active contours , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662).

[11]  Richard Kramer,et al.  Chemometric Techniques For Quantitative Analysis , 1998 .

[12]  Ghassan Hamarneh,et al.  Active Shape Models, Modeling Shape Variations and Gray Level Information and an Application to Image Search and Classification , 1998 .

[13]  J. Koenderink The structure of images , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[14]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Automatic Construction of 2D Shape Models , 2001, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[15]  David C. Hogg,et al.  Learning Flexible Models from Image Sequences , 1994, ECCV.

[16]  Terri L. Moore,et al.  Regression Analysis by Example , 2001, Technometrics.

[17]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Appearance Models , 1998, ECCV.

[18]  Milan Sonka,et al.  Object localization and border detection criteria design in edge-based image segmentation: automated learning from examples , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[20]  Steven W. Zucker,et al.  On the Foundations of Relaxation Labeling Processes , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[21]  Andrew Blake,et al.  Statistical Feature Modelling for Active Contours , 1996, ECCV.

[22]  James S. Duncan,et al.  Boundary Finding with Parametrically Deformable Models , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[23]  Lawrence H. Staib,et al.  Boundary Finding with Prior Shape and Smoothness Models , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[24]  C. Goodall Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape , 1991 .

[25]  Les A. Piegl,et al.  The NURBS Book , 1995, Monographs in Visual Communication.

[26]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Active shape model segmentation with optimal features , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[27]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  An Information Theoretic Approach to Statistical Shape Modelling , 2001, BMVC.