Profiles of US farm households adopting conservation-compatible practices

In recent years, the United States (US) government has put increasing emphasis on conservation programs geared toward rewarding good stewardship on working farmland. And, while the United States Department of Agriculture's (USDA) farmland retirement programs continue to command the lion's share of the conservation budget, roughly 80 percent of current land retirement contracts are due to expire before the end of the decade. With the 2007 US farm bill debate underway, policy makers will be making decisions about the future direction of farm conservation efforts. This paper examines the business, operator, and household characteristics of farms that have chosen to adopt conservation-compatible practices, with and without financial assistance from conservation programs. It sheds light on the relationship between adoption of conservation-compatible practices and conservation behavior, and how this relationship varies between farm business, operator, and household characteristics. Findings indicate that farm operator and household attributes, and farm business characteristics, affect the likelihood that a farmer adopts certain kinds of conservation-compatible practices.

[1]  S. Bucholtz,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE IN U.S. AGRICULTURAL POLICY: PAST PERFORMANCE AND FUTURE POTENTIAL , 2004 .

[2]  K. Wiebe,et al.  Land Tenure and the Adoption of Conservation Practices , 2000 .

[3]  J. R. Felland.  The conservation reserve , 1958 .

[4]  Amina Charania,et al.  Entertainment Media Violence: Roles for Extension Professionals , 2004 .

[5]  K. McNamara,et al.  The Impact of Local Labor Market Conditions on the Off-Farm Earnings of Farm Operators , 1990, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[6]  Jorge Fernandez-Cornejo,et al.  DECOMPOSING THE SIZE EFFECT ON THE ADOPTION OF INNOVATIONS: AGROBIOTECHNOLOGY AND PRECISION FARMING , 2002 .

[7]  Matt Lobley,et al.  Environmental Stewardship in UK agriculture: A comparison of the environmentally sensitive area programme and the Countryside Stewardship Scheme in South East England , 1998 .

[8]  S. Kraft,et al.  Enrolling conservation buffers in the CRP , 2003 .

[9]  K. Wiebe,et al.  Agricultural resources and environmental indicators , 2007 .

[10]  Luanne Lohr,et al.  Utility-Consistent Discrete-Continuous Choices in Soil Conservation , 1995 .

[11]  J. Lowenberg‐DeBoer,et al.  Precision Agriculture and Sustainability , 2004, Precision Agriculture.

[12]  T. Griffin,et al.  ADOPTION, PROFITABILITY, AND MAKING BETTER USE OF PRECISION FARMING DATA , 2004 .

[13]  Terry W. Griffin,et al.  Economics of lightbar and auto-guidance GPS navigation technologies. , 2005 .

[14]  Martin R.J. Battershill,et al.  Socio-economic constraints and environmentally friendly farming in the Southwest of England , 1997 .

[15]  R. Claassen,et al.  Agri-Environmental Policy at the Crossroads: Guideposts on a Changing Landscape , 2001 .

[16]  D. Colacicco,et al.  Natural resources and users benefit from the Conservation Reserve Program. , 1990 .

[17]  R. Johansson,et al.  Beyond Environmental Compliance: Stewardship as Good Business , 2004 .

[18]  G. Wilson.  Factors Influencing Farmer Participation in the Environmentally Sensitive Areas Scheme , 1997 .

[19]  Paul D. Allison,et al.  Logistic Regression Using the SAS System : Theory and Application , 1999 .

[20]  Keith O. Fuglie,et al.  Adoption of Agricultural Production Practices: Lessons Learned from the U.S. Department of Agriculture Area Studies Project , 2001 .

[21]  Jorge Fernandez-Cornejo,et al.  Off-farm labour and the structure of US agriculture: the case of corn/soybean farms , 2002 .

[22]  J. Fernandez-Cornejo.  Nonradial Technical Efficiency and Chemical Input Use in Agriculture , 1994, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[23]  Lori Lynch,et al.  ANALYZING AGRICULTURAL LANDOWNERS' WILLINGNESS TO INSTALL STREAMSIDE BUFFERS , 2002 .