Object-oriented extraction of beach morphology from video images

Abstract The ARGUS system is a shore-based, optical video system offering a suitable remote sensing technique for the purpose of long-term, high-resolution monitoring of coastal morphodynamics. Ten-minute time-exposure (timex) images obtained by the ARGUS cameras during low tide show the intertidal morphology (bars, troughs and rips) by the differences between water, wet sand and dry sand, where dry sand represents bars, and wet sand and water represent troughs and rips. A semi-automatic object-oriented algorithm was developed for classification of intertidal beach in low-tide video images and was tested on 13 low-tide ARGUS images collected at Noordwijk aan Zee, The Netherlands. Because of the strong relation between the visual observations and object-oriented image analysis, the ARGUS images are subdivided in small homogeneous areas (i.e. objects) by segmentation. Maximum likelihood classification creates a model for each day using a random selection of the objects, which are manually labelled, and their accompanying variables. Of the three classes, class wet sand had a classification fit of 43.4% when compared to an in situ classification; class water was correctly classified for 90.1% and dry sand could be classified best (92.8%). By combining their cross-shore position and their classification, objects can be directly linked with the respective morphological features.

[1]  K. Kingston,et al.  Applications of complex adaptive systems approaches to coastal systems , 2003 .

[2]  T. M. Lillesand,et al.  Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation , 1980 .

[3]  D. J. Doeglas The origin and destruction of beach ridges , 1955 .

[4]  A. Jones,et al.  The Use of Satellite Imagery to Determine the Distribution of Intertidal Surface Sediments of The Wash, England , 1993 .

[5]  J. C. McGrew,et al.  An Introduction to Statistical Problem Solving in Geography , 1993 .

[6]  M. Nagao,et al.  Edge preserving smoothing , 1979 .

[7]  A. Short Rip-current type, spacing and persistence, Narrabeen Beach, Australia , 1985 .

[8]  J. A. Roelvink,et al.  Argus-Based Monitoring of Intertidal Beach Morphodynamics , 1999 .

[9]  Nathaniel G. Plant,et al.  Practical use of video imagery in nearshore oceanographic field studies , 1997 .

[10]  L. Wright,et al.  Morphodynamic variability of surf zones and beaches: A synthesis , 1984 .

[11]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  Image Segmentation Methods for Object-based Analysis and Classification , 2004 .

[12]  C. V. D. Sande,et al.  A segmentation and classification approach of IKONOS-2 imagery for land cover mapping to assist flood risk and flood damage assessment , 2003 .

[13]  Ian L. Turner,et al.  Predicted and observed coastline changes at the Gold Coast artificial reef , 2001 .

[14]  Ian L Turner,et al.  A video-based technique for mapping intertidal beach bathymetry , 2003 .

[15]  J. Townshend,et al.  A modified hapke model for soil bidirectional reflectance , 1996 .

[16]  E. Owens,et al.  Ridge and Runnel Systems in the Magdalen Islands, Quebec , 1977 .

[17]  Geoffrey J. Hay,et al.  An object-specific image-texture analysis of H-resolution forest imagery☆ , 1996 .

[18]  Aart Kroon,et al.  Barred beaches , 2002 .

[19]  R. A. Holman,et al.  High‐energy nearshore processes , 1986 .