Purpose – Urban networks are usually divided into several open or closed sub‐networks. Signal coordination has been recognized as one of the most efficient methods of controlling sub‐networks that have independently optimized timing plans. However, coordinating adjacent intersections in a network is a basic prerequisite to optimizing signal‐timing plans for sub‐networks. This paper aims to develop a linear model to support decisions regarding coordination of adjacent signals.Design/methodology/approach – This paper aims to develop a linear model to support decisions regarding coordination of adjacent signals. The tests of this model which using the field data differ from those for calibration from various roadways, indicating that the model has transferability. Evaluations using microscopic simulation show that the model can objectively determine whether or not to interconnect adjacent signals depending on various traffic demands.Findings – The model was calibrated by stepwise regression analysis with a t...
[1]
Karsten G Baass,et al.
ANALYSIS OF PLATOON DISPERSION WITH RESPECT TO TRAFFIC VOLUME
,
1988
.
[2]
David E Castle,et al.
PLATOON DISPERSION OVER LONG ROAD LINKS (DISCUSSION AND CLOSURE)
,
1985
.
[3]
E C Chang.
EVALUATION OF INTERCONNECTED ARTERIAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS
,
1986
.
[4]
T Y El-Reedy,et al.
PLATOON DISPERSION ALONG A MAJOR ROAD IN SHEFFIELD
,
1978
.
[5]
H N Yagoda,et al.
SUBDIVISION OF SIGNAL SYSTEMS INTO CONTROL AREAS
,
1973
.
[6]
Roy C Loutzenheiser,et al.
VEHICLE PLATOON PARAMETERS: METHODOLOGY FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL (ABRIDGMENT)
,
1977
.
[7]
Edmond Chin-Ping Chang,et al.
How to decide the interconnection of isolated traffic signals
,
1985,
WSC '85.