One of the challenges for the current state of the art in spoken dialogue systems is how to make the limitations of the system apparent to users. These limitations have many sources: limited vocabulary, limited grammar, or limitations in the application domain. This study explored the use of a 4-minute tutorial session to acquaint novice users with the features of a spoken dialogue system for accessing email. On a set of three scenariobased tasks, novice users who had the tutorial had task completion times and user satisfaction ratings that were comparable to those of expert users of the system. Novices who did not experience the tutorial had significantly longer task completion times on the initial task, but similar completion times to the tutorial group on the final task. User satisfaction ratings of the no-tutorial group were consistently lower than the ratings of the tutorial and the expert groups. Evaluation using the PARADISE [7] framework indicated that perceived task completion, mean recognition score, and number of help requests were significant predictors of user satisfaction with the system.
[1]
E. Russell Ritenour,et al.
Evaluating spoken dialog systems for telecommunication services
,
1997,
EUROSPEECH.
[2]
C Kamm,et al.
User Interfaces for voice applications
,
1994
.
[3]
Giuseppe Riccardi,et al.
How may I help you?
,
1997,
Speech Commun..
[4]
Gina-Anne Levow,et al.
Designing SpeechActs: issues in speech user interfaces
,
1995,
CHI '95.
[5]
Allen L. Gorin,et al.
User Interface Issues for Natural Spoken Dialog Systems
,
1998
.
[6]
Victor Zue,et al.
WHEELS: a conversational system in the automobile classifieds domain
,
1996,
Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ICSLP '96.
[7]
Marilyn A. Walker,et al.
Evaluating spoken dialogue agents with PARADISE: Two case studies
,
1998,
Comput. Speech Lang..
[8]
Marilyn A. Walker,et al.
What can I say?: evaluating a spoken language interface to Email
,
1998,
CHI.