A metaheuristic approach to optimize maintenance productivity of Indian railway coach and bogie

Indian Railways being one of the largest functioning units of India employs a huge amount of manual unorganized labor. Maintenance of railway coaches and bogies is provided from part of this labor. It has always been a great challenge to find an optimal operating scenario for maximized productivity. In this work, we aimed to model and maximize maintenance productivity of Indian Railway coach and bogie . Taking into consideration the volatility of the circumstances and uncorrelated behavior of different human factors affecting productivity, to obtain the best scenario five of the most critical human factors were identified that are expected to affect the maintenance of the coaches and bogies most. Cobb-Douglas production function was used to model maintenance productivity with the chosen human factors. The main goal after designing the model for productivity is to maximize it. To get the optimal productivity Differential Evolution algorithm is used. Finally, the Cuckoo search algorithm is applied to validate the results.

[1]  Francisco Rebelo,et al.  Determinants of sleepiness at work among railway control workers. , 2017, Applied ergonomics.

[2]  Jessie Y. C. Chen,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Factors Affecting Trust in Human-Robot Interaction , 2011, Hum. Factors.

[3]  Nicole Jansen,et al.  Need for recovery from work: evaluating short-term effects of working hours, patterns and schedules , 2003, Ergonomics.

[4]  S. Karagiannis,et al.  Do education quality and spillovers matter? Evidence on human capital and productivity in Greece , 2016 .

[5]  John R. Wilson,et al.  Mental Models: Theory and Application in Human Factors , 1989 .

[6]  I. Coxhead,et al.  Does Freer Trade Really Lead to Productivity Growth? Evidence from Africa , 2016 .

[7]  H. Lieth.  Modeling the Primary Productivity of the World , 1975 .

[8]  S. M. Keller.  Effects of extended work shifts and shift work on patient safety, productivity, and employee health. , 2009, AAOHN journal : official journal of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses.

[9]  Hal W. Hendrick.  Ergonomics in organizational design and management , 1991 .

[10]  T. Coelli.  Estimators and hypothesis tests for a stochastic frontier function: A Monte Carlo analysis , 1995 .

[11]  R. Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution: A Practical Approach to Global Optimization (Natural Computing Series) , 2005 .

[12]  R. Ahasan,et al.  Human adaptation to shift work in improving health, safety and productivity – some recommendations , 2002 .

[13]  A. Goldberger.  The Interpretation and Estimation of Cobb-Douglas Functions , 1968 .

[14]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[15]  James Ellison,et al.  Off the rails: factors affecting track worker safety in the rail industry , 2006 .

[16]  P. Douglas.  The Cobb-Douglas Production Function Once Again: Its History, Its Testing, and Some New Empirical Values , 1976, Journal of Political Economy.

[17]  Alexander Verl,et al.  Cooperation of human and machines in assembly lines , 2009 .