Computational Argumentation and Cognition

This paper examines the interdisciplinary research question of how to integrate Computational Argumentation, as studied in AI, with Cognition, as can be found in Cognitive Science, Linguistics, and Philosophy. It stems from the work of the 1st Workshop on Computational Argumentation and Cognition (COGNITAR), which was organized as part of the 24th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), and took place virtually on September 8th, 2020. The paper begins with a brief presentation of the scientific motivation for the integration of Computational Argumentation and Cognition, arguing that within the context of Human-Centric AI the use of theory and methods from Computational Argumentation for the study of Cognition can be a promising avenue to pursue. A short summary of each of the workshop presentations is given showing the wide spectrum of problems where the synthesis of the theory and methods of Computational Argumentation with other approaches that study Cognition can be applied. The paper presents the main problems and challenges in the area that would need to be addressed, both at the scientific level but also at the epistemological level, particularly in relation to the synthesis of ideas and approaches from the various disciplines involved.

[1]  J. Pollock Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for How to Build a Person , 1995 .

[2]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Formalizing Informal Logic , 2015 .

[3]  Henry Prakken,et al.  Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument: A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law , 1997 .

[4]  M. Hinton Language and argument: a review of the field , 2019, Research in Language.

[5]  Floriana Grasso,et al.  Recent advances in computational models of natural argument , 2007, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[6]  Antonis C. Kakas,et al.  Informalizing Formal Logic , 2019, Bridging@CogSci.

[7]  H. Mercier The Argumentative Theory: Predictions and Empirical Evidence , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  U. Hahn,et al.  Reasoning and argumentation: Towards an integrated psychology of argumentation , 2012 .

[9]  Douglas Walton,et al.  How Computational Tools Can Help Rhetoric and Informal Logic with Argument Invention , 2019 .

[10]  Henry Prakken,et al.  Towards Artificial Argumentation , 2017, AI Mag..

[11]  Emmanuelle-Anna Dietz Saldanha,et al.  Cognitive Argumentation for Human Syllogistic Reasoning , 2019, KI - Künstliche Intelligenz.

[12]  F. H. Eemeren,et al.  Handbook of Argumentation Theory: A Critical Survey of Classical Backgrounds and Modern Studies , 1987 .

[13]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Strategical Argumentative Agent for Human Persuasion , 2016, ECAI.

[14]  Dov M. Gabbay,et al.  A neural cognitive model of argumentation with application to legal inference and decision making , 2014, J. Appl. Log..

[15]  Chris Reed,et al.  Advances in Argument Mining , 2019, ACL.

[16]  Emmanuelle-Anna Dietz Saldanha,et al.  Logic Programming, Argumentation and Human Reasoning , 2020, CLAR.

[17]  E. Krabbe The Formalization of Critical Discussion , 2017 .

[18]  J. Dessalles,et al.  Arguing, reasoning, and the interpersonal (cultural) functions of human consciousness , 2011, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[19]  Karin Baier,et al.  The Uses Of Argument , 2016 .

[20]  Antonis C. Kakas,et al.  Cognitive Systems: Argument and Cognition , 2016, IEEE Intell. Informatics Bull..

[21]  Frank Zenker,et al.  A probabilistic analysis of argument cogency , 2016, Synthese.

[22]  Floris Bex,et al.  Arguments, Stories and Criminal Evidence - A Formal Hybrid Theory , 2011, Law and philosophy library.

[23]  Bart Verheij,et al.  Formalizing value-guided argumentation for ethical systems design , 2016, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[24]  D. Walton Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning , 1995 .

[25]  A. Skowron,et al.  The Polish School of Argumentation: A Manifesto , 2014 .

[26]  Marcin Koszowy,et al.  Argumentation in the 2016 US presidential elections: annotated corpora of television debates and social media reaction , 2019, Language Resources and Evaluation.

[27]  John L. Pollock,et al.  Defeasible Reasoning , 2020, Synthese Library.

[28]  D. Godden Argumentation, rationality, and psychology of reasoning , 2015 .

[29]  Fabiana Vernero,et al.  Influencing the Others' Minds: An Experimental Evaluation of the Use and Efficacy of Fallacious-Reducible Arguments in Web and Mobile Technologies , 2014, PsychNology J..

[30]  Loizos Michael,et al.  Cognitive Reasoning and Learning Mechanisms , 2016, AIC.

[31]  Marcos Cramer,et al.  Technical report of "Empirical Study on Human Evaluation of Complex Argumentation Frameworks" , 2019, ArXiv.

[32]  Ch. Perelman,et al.  The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation , 1971 .

[33]  Steve Oswald, Thierry Herman and Jérôme Jacquin (eds.): Argumentation and Language-Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations , 2019, Argumentation.

[34]  Nick Chater,et al.  New Paradigms in the Psychology of Reasoning. , 2020, Annual review of psychology.

[35]  E. Krabbe,et al.  Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation , 2012 .

[36]  Loizos Michael Machine Coaching , 2019 .

[37]  F. H. Eemeren,et al.  A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach , 2003 .

[38]  M. Hoffmann Reflective Argumentation: A Cognitive Function of Arguing , 2016 .