Cellular mechanisms for integral feedback in visually guided behavior

Significance Visually driven behaviors of Drosophila have become a model system to study how neural circuits process sensory information. Here, we show that one of the computations performed by this system is temporal integration of visual motion. We provide evidence of how this computation might be performed by measuring the activity of identified visual interneurons during tethered flight that are thought to control the described behavior: Presynaptic calcium accumulation in these neurons mimics a leaky temporal integration of the visual motion signal as does the behavior. In the future, the genetic tools available in Drosophila will enable studying the precise mechanism of temporal integration in this model system, which could provide insights into general mechanisms of neuronal information processing. Sensory feedback is a ubiquitous feature of guidance systems in both animals and engineered vehicles. For example, a common strategy for moving along a straight path is to turn such that the measured rate of rotation is zero. This task can be accomplished by using a feedback signal that is proportional to the instantaneous value of the measured sensory signal. In such a system, the addition of an integral term depending on past values of the sensory input is needed to eliminate steady-state error [proportional-integral (PI) control]. However, the means by which nervous systems implement such a computation are poorly understood. Here, we show that the optomotor responses of flying Drosophila follow a time course consistent with temporal integration of horizontal motion input. To investigate the cellular basis of this effect, we performed whole-cell patch-clamp recordings from the set of identified visual interneurons [horizontal system (HS) cells] thought to control this reflex during tethered flight. At high stimulus speeds, HS cells exhibit steady-state responses during flight that are absent during quiescence, a state-dependent difference in physiology that is explained by changes in their presynaptic inputs. However, even during flight, the membrane potential of the large-field interneurons exhibits no evidence for integration that could explain the behavioral responses. However, using a genetically encoded indicator, we found that calcium accumulates in the terminals of the interneurons along a time course consistent with the behavior and propose that this accumulation provides a mechanism for temporal integration of sensory feedback consistent with PI control.

[1]  D. Robinson,et al.  Integrating with neurons. , 1989, Annual review of neuroscience.

[2]  S. N. Fry,et al.  The Aerodynamics of Free-Flight Maneuvers in Drosophila , 2003, Science.

[3]  M. Dickinson,et al.  The changes in power requirements and muscle efficiency during elevated force production in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[4]  G. Geiger,et al.  Visual orientation behaviour of flies after selective laser beam ablation of interneurones , 1981, Nature.

[5]  Dawnis M. Chow,et al.  The spatial, temporal and contrast properties of expansion and rotation flight optomotor responses in Drosophila , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[6]  Michael H Dickinson,et al.  Spatial organization of visuomotor reflexes in Drosophila , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[7]  A. Borst,et al.  Fly motion vision. , 2010, Annual review of neuroscience.

[8]  John Guckenheimer,et al.  Discovering the flight autostabilizer of fruit flies by inducing aerial stumbles , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  M. Dickinson,et al.  Active flight increases the gain of visual motion processing in Drosophila , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  Alexander Borst,et al.  Optogenetic Control of Fly Optomotor Responses , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  C. Wehrhahn,et al.  Microsurgical lesion of horizontal cells changes optomotor yaw responses in the blowfly Calliphora erythrocephala , 1983, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[12]  R. Wolf,et al.  On the fine structure of yaw torque in visual flight orientation ofDrosophila melanogaster , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[13]  M. Dickinson,et al.  A linear systems analysis of the yaw dynamics of a dynamically scaled insect model , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[14]  S. N. Fry,et al.  Visual control of flight speed in Drosophila melanogaster , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[15]  Martin Egelhaaf,et al.  Dynamic properties of two control systems underlying visually guided turning in house-flies , 1987, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[16]  R. Wolf,et al.  On the fine structure of yaw torque in visual flight orientation ofDrosophila melanogaster , 1979, Journal of comparative physiology.

[17]  Mark A Frye,et al.  Dynamics of optomotor responses in Drosophila to perturbations in optic flow , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[18]  A. Borst,et al.  Central gating of fly optomotor response , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Z. J. Wang,et al.  Fruit flies modulate passive wing pitching to generate in-flight turns. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[20]  Stefan R. Pulver,et al.  Ultra-sensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity , 2013, Nature.

[21]  A. Borst,et al.  Columnar cells necessary for motion responses of wide-field visual interneurons in Drosophila , 2012, Journal of Comparative Physiology.

[22]  B Schnell,et al.  Processing of horizontal optic flow in three visual interneurons of the Drosophila brain. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  Dario L. Ringach,et al.  Reverse correlation in neurophysiology , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[24]  Alexander Borst,et al.  Synaptic organization of lobula plate tangential cells in Drosophila: γ‐Aminobutyric acid receptors and chemical release sites , 2007, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[25]  Peter T Weir,et al.  Central complex neurons exhibit behaviorally gated responses to visual motion in Drosophila. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  Alexander Borst,et al.  Flight Activity Alters Velocity Tuning of Fly Motion-Sensitive Neurons , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  S. N. Fry,et al.  The aerodynamics of hovering flight in Drosophila , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[28]  Louis K. Scheffer,et al.  A visual motion detection circuit suggested by Drosophila connectomics , 2013, Nature.

[29]  Michael B. Reiser,et al.  Walking Modulates Speed Sensitivity in Drosophila Motion Vision , 2010, Current Biology.

[30]  Marie P Suver,et al.  Octopamine Neurons Mediate Flight-Induced Modulation of Visual Processing in Drosophila , 2012, Current Biology.

[31]  Gordon J. Berman,et al.  Automated hull reconstruction motion tracking (HRMT) applied to sideways maneuvers of free-flying insects , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[32]  D. Tank,et al.  Persistent neural activity: prevalence and mechanisms , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[33]  Mark A. Frye,et al.  Binocular Interactions Underlying the Classic Optomotor Responses of Flying Flies , 2012, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[34]  R. Wolf,et al.  Visual control of straight flight in Drosophila melanogaster , 1990, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[35]  Karl Georg Götz,et al.  Flight control in Drosophila by visual perception of motion , 1968, Kybernetik.

[36]  Michael H Dickinson,et al.  Collision-avoidance and landing responses are mediated by separate pathways in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[37]  G. Rubin,et al.  A directional tuning map of Drosophila elementary motion detectors , 2013, Nature.

[38]  Michael H. Dickinson,et al.  A task-level model for optomotor yaw regulation in drosophila melanogaster: A frequency-domain system identification approach , 2012, 2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[39]  K. Hausen Motion sensitive interneurons in the optomotor system of the fly , 1982, Biological Cybernetics.

[40]  R. Wolf,et al.  Optomotor-blindH31—aDrosophila mutant of the lobula plate giant neurons , 1978, Journal of comparative physiology.

[41]  Michael B. Reiser,et al.  Corrigendum: Two-photon calcium imaging from head-fixed Drosophila during optomotor walking behavior , 2011, Nature Methods.

[42]  Michael B. Reiser,et al.  Neural correlates of illusory motion perception in Drosophila , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  B. Cohen,et al.  Eye movements induced by stimulation of the pontine reticular formation: evidence for integration in oculomotor pathways. , 1972, Experimental neurology.

[44]  Karl Georg Götz,et al.  Optomotor control of wing beat and body posture in drosophila , 1979, Biological Cybernetics.

[45]  M. Hoagland,et al.  Feedback Systems An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers SECOND EDITION , 2015 .