Egg size, embryonic development time and ovoviviparity in Drosophila species

Lengths, widths and volumes of eggs from 11 species of Drosophila whose genomes have been fully sequenced exhibit significant variation that is not explained by their phylogenetic relationships. Furthermore, egg size differences are unrelated to embryonic development time in these species. In addition, two of the species, Drosophila sechellia and, to a lesser degree, D. yakuba, both ecological specialists, exhibit ovoviviparity, suggesting that female control over oviposition in these species differs from what is observed in D. melanogaster. The interspecific differences in these reproductive characters, coupled with the availability of whole genome sequences for each, provide an unprecedented opportunity to examine their evolution.

[1]  Snezana Lawrence October , 1855, The Hospital.

[2]  D. Brncic ECOLOGICAL AND CYTOGENETIC STUDIES OF DROSOPHILA FLAVOPILOSA, A NEOTROPICAL SPECIES LIVING IN CESTRUM FLOWERS , 1966, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  M. Kambysellis,et al.  Studies of Oogenesis in Natural Populations of Drosophilidae. I. Relation of Ovarian Development and Ecological Habitats of the Hawaiian Species , 1971, The American Naturalist.

[4]  New Anthophilic Drosophila1 of Colombia , 1979 .

[5]  J. Montague The Ecology of Hawaiian Flower-Breeding Drosophilids. I. Selection in the Larval Habitat , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[6]  J. Montague The Ecology of Hawaiian Flower-Breeding Drosophilids. 2. Adult Dispersions and Reproductive Ecology , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[7]  T. Garland,et al.  Procedures for the Analysis of Comparative Data Using Phylogenetically Independent Contrasts , 1992 .

[8]  A. S. Hunter Flower-Breeding Drosophila of Bogota, Colombia: new species (Diptera: Drosophilidae) , 1992 .

[9]  J. David,et al.  Genetics of a nonoptimal behavior: Oviposition preference ofDrosophila mauritiana for a toxic resource , 1994, Behavior genetics.

[10]  Andrew Rambaut,et al.  Comparative analysis by independent contrasts (CAIC): an Apple Macintosh application for analysing comparative data , 1995, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[11]  T. Markow,et al.  Delayed male maturity is a cost of producing large sperm in Drosophila. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  F. C. Val,et al.  Drosophilidae (Diptera) from the Pantanal of Mato Grosso (Brazil), with the description of a new species belonging to the bromeliae group of the genus Drosophila. , 1996 .

[13]  R. R. Snook IS THE PRODUCTION OF MULTIPLE SPERM TYPES ADAPTIVE? , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[14]  J. Coyne,et al.  Evolution of a lesser fitness trait: egg production in the specialist Drosophila sechellia. , 1997, Genetical research.

[15]  R. Meier,et al.  Ovoviviparity and viviparity in the Diptera , 1999 .

[16]  L. L. Wolf,et al.  Phylogenetic, Geographical, and Temporal Analysis of Female Reproductive Trade-Offs in Drosophilidae , 2003 .

[17]  J. Jallon,et al.  Molecular basis ofMorinda citrifolia (L.): Toxicity on drosophila , 1994, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[18]  H Jongde,et al.  Drosophila. A guide to species identification and use , 2006 .

[19]  S. Pitnick,et al.  Intensity of sexual selection along the anisogamy–isogamy continuum , 2006, Nature.

[20]  Melanie A. Huntley,et al.  Evolution of genes and genomes on the Drosophila phylogeny , 2007, Nature.

[21]  M. Kreitman,et al.  Canalization of segmentation and its evolution in Drosophila , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  M. Wolfner "S.P.E.R.M." (seminal proteins (are) essential reproductive modulators): the view from Drosophila. , 2007, Society of Reproduction and Fertility supplement.

[23]  Thomas Gregor,et al.  Shape and function of the Bicoid morphogen gradient in dipteran species with different sized embryos. , 2008, Developmental biology.