Failure of Weibull distribution to represent switching statistics in OxRAM

Considering the reasonable similarity in the physical mechanisms governing oxide breakdown and filamentary resistive switching, the use of the Weibull distribution has been widespread in the RRAM community for describing the stochastics of Forming, SET, RESET and read disturb data sets. Upon close examination, it is apparent that the Weibull fitting tends to be poor at the high percentiles for most of these data sets in RRAM (both vacancy based (OxRAM) and metal filament (CBRAM) based switching). The fundamental origin of these deviations is investigated in this work for OxRAM stacks through an analytical model making use of the percolation theory as the backbone framework and considering the physical process of thermochemical bond breaking that governs forming and SET events in resistance switching and the cycle-to-cycle variability inherent in the filament size and shape due to these atomistic events. Our model is compared with the standard Weibull distribution for fitting several data sets reported in the literature. The recently proposed defect clustering model is shown to be a better representative of the statistical physics governing the forming and SET switching process. Display Omitted Weibull model proven to be invalid for modeling switching statistics in OxRAM.Physics based analytical model has been proposed for forming and SET events.Defect clustering model is most suited off-the-shelf distribution for OxRAM.Statistical evidence supporting single filament switching trend is presented.Variability in cycle-to-cycle switching causes concave trend at high percentile.

[1]  J.C. Lee,et al.  Thickness dependence of Weibull slopes of HfO2 gate dielectrics , 2003, IEEE Electron Device Letters.

[2]  K. Devriendt,et al.  Investigation of Forming and Its Controllability in Novel HfO 2 -Based 1T1R 40nm-Crossbar RRAM Cells , 2011 .

[3]  O. Richard,et al.  10×10nm2 Hf/HfOx crossbar resistive RAM with excellent performance, reliability and low-energy operation , 2011, 2011 International Electron Devices Meeting.

[4]  N. Raghavan.  Statistics of disturb events in OxRAM devices — A phenomenological model , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS).

[5]  Tuo-Hung Hou,et al.  Rapid Prediction of RRAM RESET-State Disturb by Ramped Voltage Stress , 2012, IEEE Electron Device Letters.

[6]  Guido Groeseneken,et al.  Methodologies for sub-1nm EOT TDDB evaluation , 2011, 2011 International Reliability Physics Symposium.

[7]  J. Stathis,et al.  Time-dependent clustering model versus combination-based approach for BEOL/MOL and FEOL non-uniform dielectric breakdown: Similarities and disparities , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium.

[8]  Yoshifumi Nishi,et al.  Weibull analysis of the kinetics of resistive switches based on tantalum oxide thin films , 2013, 2013 Proceedings of the European Solid-State Device Research Conference (ESSDERC).

[9]  Anabela Veloso,et al.  Reliability screening of high-k dielectrics based on voltage ramp stress , 2007, Microelectron. Reliab..

[10]  G. Bersuker,et al.  Electron-Injection-Assisted Generation of Oxygen Vacancies in Monoclinic HfO2 , 2015 .

[11]  D. Ielmini,et al.  Reset Statistics of NiO-Based Resistive Switching Memories , 2011, IEEE Electron Device Letters.

[12]  James H. Stathis,et al.  Modeling of time-dependent non-uniform dielectric breakdown using a clustering statistical approach , 2013 .

[13]  J. McPherson,et al.  Complementary model for intrinsic time-dependent dielectric breakdown in SiO2 dielectrics , 2000 .

[14]  Zongliang Huo,et al.  Compact analytical models for the SET and RESET switching statistics of RRAM inspired in the cell-based percolation model of gate dielectric breakdown , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS).

[15]  Nagarajan Raghavan,et al.  Application of the defect clustering model for forming, SET and RESET statistics in RRAM devices , 2016, Microelectron. Reliab..