Clonal variation in morphology, growth, physiology, anatomy and ultrastructure of container-grown white spruce somatic plants.

We assessed clonal variation in morphological variables, mineral nutrition, root growth capacity, net photosynthesis, tannin distribution, and cuticle and epicuticular wax features within four families of white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss). Seeds were collected from four families obtained through controlled crosses among selected genotypes. For each family, plants were produced either from seeds (zygotic) or by somatic embryogenesis (clones). Each family was therefore represented by its zygotic seedlings and three clones. Within a family and under similar growth conditions, several clones differed significantly from the zygotic seedlings in height, root-collar diameter, needle dry mass, branch density, shoot dry mass, root dry mass, and length of needles. Branch density (number of first-order branches per cm height) of zygotic seedlings and clones varied from 0.8 to 1.4 branches cm(-1) and from 0.6 to 1.3 branches cm(-1), respectively. Mean needle length of zygotic seedlings and clones ranged from 11 to 14 mm and from 11 to 17 mm, respectively. For many variables (height, dry mass of new roots, needle dry mass and branch density), differences among clones were significantly greater than differences among zygotic seedlings within a family. Tannins were more abundant in needles of clones than in needles of zygotic seedlings. In some clones, tannins occurred as a ribbon along the central vacuole, whereas in others they appeared as aggregates dispersed in the vacuole. Within a family, N, P and K showed considerable variations in their use efficiency. Interclonal variations were observed in root growth potential and net photosynthesis. Variations in growth and physiology reflect genetically determined differences among clones within a family.

[1]  F. Tremblay.  Somatic embryogenesis and plantlet regeneration from embryos isolated from stored seeds of Picea glauca. , 1990 .

[2]  D. Roberts,et al.  A delivery system for naked somatic embryos of interior spruce , 1995 .

[3]  Robert D. Guy,et al.  Stable carbon isotopes as indicators of increased water use efficiency and productivity in white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) seedlings , 1996 .

[4]  C. Pounders,et al.  Multiple Propagation Effects on Genetic Estimates of Rooting for Western Hemlock , 1992 .

[5]  P. Bernier,et al.  Gas exchange and water relations of 3 sizes of containerized Picea mariana seedlings subjected to atmospheric and edaphic water stress under controlled conditions , 1995 .

[6]  S. E. Allen,et al.  A wet oxidation procedure suitable for the determination of nitrogen and mineral nutrients in biological material , 1975 .

[7]  R. Rose.  Root growth potential and starch differences in seedlings of six families of genetically improved loblolly pine , 1992 .

[8]  D. Quiring,et al.  Genetically based differences in susceptibility of white spruce to the spruce bud moth , 1991 .

[9]  R. Kreh,et al.  Seedling Root Growth Potential as an Indicator of Loblolly Pine Field Performance , 1985 .

[10]  R. Teskey,et al.  Seasonal patterns of net photosynthesis of loblolly pine from diverse origins , 1986 .

[11]  P. Curtis,et al.  Genotypic variation for condensed tannin production in trembling aspen (POPULUS TREMULOIDES, salicaceae) under elevated CO2 and in high- and low-fertility soil. , 1999, American journal of botany.

[12]  Eric Garnier,et al.  Plant growth analysis: an evaluation of experimental design and computational methods , 1996 .

[13]  P. Bernier,et al.  Ecophysiology and field performance of black spruce (Picea mariana): a review. , 1994 .

[14]  Somatic embryogenesis in conifers , 1991 .

[15]  B. Karlsson,et al.  Nursery selection of Picea abies clones and effects in field trials , 1998 .

[16]  G. Bowen,et al.  Root morphology, growth and uptake of phosphorus and nitrogen of Pinus radiata families in different soils , 1993 .

[17]  W. Zucker.  Tannins: Does Structure Determine Function? An Ecological Perspective , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[18]  J. Major,et al.  Interior spruce seedlings compared with emblings produced from somatic embryogenesis. II: Stock quality assessment prior to field planting , 1994 .

[19]  G. Collatz,et al.  Profiles of photosynthetically active radiation, nitrogen and photosynthetic capacity in the boreal forest: Implications for scaling from leaf to canopy , 1997 .

[20]  J. Major,et al.  Interior spruce seedlings compared with emblings produced from somatic embryogenesis. I. Nursery development, fall acclimation, and over-winter storage , 1994 .

[21]  A. Fries,et al.  Genetic control of rooting ability of lodgepole pine cuttings , 1997 .

[22]  Göran I. Ågren,et al.  Theory for growth of plants derived from the nitrogen productivity concept , 1985 .

[23]  J. A. McAlister,et al.  Nutrient enrichment of white spruce seedlings during nursery culture and initial plantation establishment. , 1998, Tree physiology.

[24]  J. Beaulieu.  Breeding program and strategy for white spruce in Quebec. , 1996 .

[25]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Variations in photosynthetic, anatomical, and enzymatic leaf traits and correlations with growth in recently selected Populus hybrids. , 1987 .

[26]  J. Beaulieu,et al.  Genetic variation in juvenile growth and phenology of white spruce provenance-progeny test. , 1993 .

[27]  R. H. Wilson,et al.  Clonal differences in dry matter distribution, wood specific gravity and foliage «efficiency» in Picea sitchensis and Pinus contorta , 1983 .

[28]  A. Munson,et al.  Comparing natural and planted black spruce seedlings. II. Nutrient uptake and efficiency of use , 1993 .

[29]  E. Morgenstern,et al.  Correlations of height growth and heritabilities at different ages in white spruce. , 1979 .

[30]  H. Muse,et al.  Frequency distribution and heritability of first-order lateral roots in loblolly pine seedlings , 1990 .

[31]  S. Fan,et al.  Comparisons of gas exchange parameters and shoot water relations of interior spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss times Picea engelmannii Parry ex Engelm.) clones under repeated soil drought , 1998 .

[32]  Dallas E. Johnson,et al.  Analysis of messy data , 1992 .

[33]  Shaw‐Yhi Hwang,et al.  Clonal variation in foliar chemistry of quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) , 1996 .

[34]  D. South,et al.  Root growth potential, seedling morphology and bud dormancy correlate with survival of loblolly pine seedlings planted in December in Alabama. , 1986, Tree physiology.

[35]  S. Soikkeli.  Seasonal changes in mesophyll ultrastructure of needles of Norway spruce (Picea abies) , 1978 .

[36]  C. Hébert,et al.  Physiological and growth responses of three sizes of containerized Picea mariana seedlings outplanted with and without vegetation control , 1998 .

[37]  S. Arnold,et al.  Integration of somatic embryogenesis in a tree breeding programme: a case study with Picea abies , 1998 .

[38]  R. Lindroth,et al.  Clonal variation in foliar chemistry of aspen: effects on gypsy moths and forest tent caterpillars , 1997, Oecologia.

[39]  K. Johnsen,et al.  Family variation in photosynthesis of 22-year-old black spruce: a test of two models of physiological response to water stress , 1996 .

[40]  M. Greenwood,et al.  Early selection of black spruce using physiological and morphological criteria , 1993 .

[41]  S. Fan,et al.  Genetic variation in summer gas exchange patterns of interior spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss times Picea engelmannii Parry ex Engelm.) , 1998 .

[42]  R. Driessche.  Importance of current photosynthate to new root growth in planted conifer seedlings , 1987 .

[43]  S. T. Gower,et al.  Leaf area index of boreal forests: theory, techniques, and measurements , 1997 .

[44]  W. Libby,et al.  Advantages of Clonal Forestry , 1984 .